Economic Theory

, Volume 32, Issue 2, pp 353–380 | Cite as

Two-sided Markets, Competitive Bottlenecks and Exclusive Contracts

Research Article

Abstract

We provide a framework for analyzing two-sided markets that allows for different degrees of product differentiation on each side of the market. When platforms are viewed as homogenous by sellers but heterogeneous by buyers, we show that “competitive bottlenecks” arise endogenously. In equilibrium, platforms do not compete directly for sellers, instead choosing to compete indirectly by subsidizing buyers to join. Sellers are left with none of the gains from trade. Despite this, it is sellers who choose to purchase from multiple platforms (multihome). Finally, the role of exclusive contracts to prevent multihoming is explored.

Keywords

Two-sided markets Network externalities Exclusive contracts 

JEL Classification Numbers

D43 D62 L13 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Armstrong M. (2002). The theory of access pricing and interconnection. In: Cave M., Majumdar S., and Vogelsang I. (eds) Handbook of telecommunications economics Vol I. North-Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  2. Armstrong, M.: Competition in two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 2006 (in press)Google Scholar
  3. Bernheim B., Whinston M. (1998). Exclusive dealing. J Polit Econ 106:64–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Binmore K., Harbord D. (2005). Bargaining over fixed-to-mobile termination rates: countervailing buyer power as a constraint on monopoly power. J Competition Law Econ 1:49–72Google Scholar
  5. Caillaud B., Jullien B. (2001). Competing cybermediaries. Eur Econ Rev 45:797–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caillaud B., Jullien B. (2003). Chicken and egg: competition among intermediation service providers. Rand J Econ 34:309–328CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Evans D. (2003a). The antitrust economics of multi-sided platform markets. Yale J Regul 20:325–382Google Scholar
  8. Evans D. (2003b). Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform competition. Rev Netw Econ 2:191–209Google Scholar
  9. Gabszewicz, J., Wauthy, X.: Two-sided markets and price competition with multi-homing. Mimeo (2004)Google Scholar
  10. Gabszewicz J., Laussel D., Sonnac N. (2001). Press advertising and the ascent of the ‘pensée unique’. Eur Econ Rev 45:641–651CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hagiu, A.: Optimal pricing and commitment in two-sided markets. Mimeo (2004)Google Scholar
  12. McCabe, M., Snyder, C.: The economics of open access journals. Mimeo (2004)Google Scholar
  13. Rochet J.-C., Tirole J. (2003). Platform competition in two-sided markets. J Eur Econ Assoc 1:990–1029CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Rochet, J.-C., Tirole, J.: Defining two-sided markets. Rand J Econ 2006 (in press)Google Scholar
  15. Rysman M. (2004). Competition between networks: a study of the market for yellow pages. Rev Econ Stud 71:483–512CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Wright J. (2002). Access pricing under competition: an application to cellular networks. J Ind Econ 50:289–316Google Scholar
  17. Wright J. (2004). One-sided logic in two-sided markets. Rev Netw Econ 3:42–63Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations