Performance of predictive tools to identify individuals at risk of non-traumatic fracture: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression
- 81 Downloads
There is no consensus on which tool is the most accurate to assess fracture risk. The results of this systematic review suggest that QFracture, Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) with BMD, and Garvan with BMD are the tools with the best discriminative ability. More studies assessing the comparative performance of current tools are needed.
Many tools exist to assess fracture risk. This review aims to determine which tools have the best predictive accuracy to identify individuals at high risk of non-traumatic fracture.
Studies assessing the accuracy of tools for prediction of fracture were searched in MEDLINE, EMBASE, Evidence-Based Medicine Reviews, and Global Health. Studies were eligible if discrimination was assessed in a population independent of the derivation cohort. Meta-analyses and meta-regressions were performed on areas under the ROC curve (AUCs). Gender, mean age, age range, and study quality were used as adjustment variables.
We identified 53 validation studies assessing the discriminative ability of 14 tools. Given the small number of studies on some tools, only FRAX, Garvan, and QFracture were compared using meta-regression models. In the unadjusted analyses, QFracture had the best discriminative ability to predict hip fracture (AUC = 0.88). In the adjusted analysis, FRAX with BMD (AUC = 0.81) and Garvan with BMD (AUC = 0.79) had the highest AUCs. For prediction of major osteoporotic fracture, QFracture had the best discriminative ability (AUC = 0.77). For prediction of osteoporotic or any fracture, FRAX with BMD and Garvan with BMD had higher discriminative ability than their versions without BMD (FRAX: AUC = 0.72 vs 0.69, Garvan: AUC = 0.72 vs 0.65). A significant amount of heterogeneity was present in the analyses.
QFracture, FRAX with BMD, and Garvan with BMD have the highest discriminative performance for predicting fracture. Additional studies in which the performance of current tools is assessed in the same individuals may be performed to confirm this conclusion.
KeywordsDiscrimination Fracture Osteoporosis Risk assessment Systematic review Validation
We gratefully aknowledge Vicky Tessier who has reviewed the search strategy.
C Beaudoin has received a scholarship from the CHU de Québec and the Fonds de recherche du Québec-Santé (FRQS).
Compliance with ethical standards
C Beaudoin, S Jean, L Moore, and M Gagné have no conflict of interest to disclose.
L Bessette has received grant/research support from Amgen Inc., BMS, Janssen, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis; has consulted for Amgen Inc., BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis; and is a member of the Speakers’ Bureau for Amgen Inc., BMS, Janssen, Roche, UCB, AbbVie, Pfizer, Merck, Celgene, Sanofi, Eli Lilly, and Novartis.
LG Ste-Marie has received grant/research support from Amgen Inc., has been a member of the advisory board of Amgen Inc. and Eli Lilly, and received other financial supports from AstraZeneca.
JP Brown has received grant/research support from Amgen Inc. and Eli Lilly; has consulted for Amgen Inc., Eli Lilly, and Merck; and is a member of the Speakers’ Bureau for Amgen Inc. and Eli Lilly.
- 1.NIH Consensus Development Panel on Osteoporosis Prevention, Diagnosis, and Therapy (2001) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. JAMA. 285(6):785–795Google Scholar
- 2.Osteoporosis Canada. Men and Osteoporosis [Available from: https://www.osteoporosis.ca/osteoporosis-and-you/men-and-osteoporosis/. Accessed 08 Mar 2019
- 3.Adachi JD, Loannidis G, Berger C, Joseph L, Papaioannou A, Pickard L, Papadimitropoulos EA, Hopman W, Poliquin S, Prior JC, Hanley DA, Olszynski WP, Anastassiades T, Brown JP, Murray T, Jackson SA, Tenenhouse A, Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study (CaMos) Research Group (2001) The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12(11):903–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, Kennedy CC, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Goltzman D, Thabane L, Gafni A, Papadimitropoulos EA, Brown JP, Josse RG, Hanley DA, Adachi JD (2009) Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study. CMAJ. 181(5):265–271PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 12.Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, for the Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. CMAJ. 182(17):1864–1873PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Iki M, Fujita Y, Tamaki J, Kouda K, Yura A, Sato Y, Moon JS, Winzenrieth R, Okamoto N, Kurumatani N (2015) Trabecular bone score may improve FRAX prediction accuracy for major osteoporotic fractures in elderly Japanese men: the Fujiwara-kyo osteoporosis risk in men (FORMEN) cohort study. Osteoporos Int 26(6):1841–1848PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 20.Goldshtein I, Gerber Y, Ish-Shalom S, Leshno M (2016) Validation of fracture risk assesment tool using real-world data. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 25:250–251Google Scholar
- 21.Holloway KL, Mohebbi M, Hans D, Brennan-Olsen SL, Kotowicz MA, Pasco JA (2016) Prediction of hip fractures in Australian men using FRAX scores adjusted with trabecular bone score. Osteoporos Int 27(1 SUPPL. 1):S351Google Scholar
- 22.Klop C, De Vries F, Bijlsma JWJ, Leufkens HGM, Welsing PMJ (2016) Predicting the 10-year risk of hip and major osteoporotic fracture in rheumatoid arthritis and in the general population: an independent validation and update of UK FRAX without bone mineral density. Ann Rheum Dis 75(12):2095–2100PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 23.Sundh V, Jonasson G (2016) FRAX and mandibular sparse trabeculation as fracture predictors: a longitudinal study 1980–2002. Osteoporos Int 27(1 SUPPL. 1):S257Google Scholar
- 24.Dagan N, Cohen-Stavi C, Leventer-Roberts M, Balicer RD (2017) External validation and comparison of three prediction tools for risk of osteoporotic fractures using data from population based electronic health records: retrospective cohort study. BMJ (Online) 356:i6755Google Scholar
- 25.Francesco L, Elisa B, Raffaella M, Alessandro P, Iacopo C, Giampiero M, et al. (2017) Assessing risk of osteoporotic fractures in primary care: development and validation of the FRA-HS algorithm. Calcif Tissue Int 1–13Google Scholar
- 26.Hoff M, Meyer HE, Skurtveit S, Langhammer A, Sogaard AJ, Syversen U et al (2017) Validation of FRAX and the impact of self-reported falls among elderly in a general population: the HUNT study. Norway Osteoporos Int:1–10Google Scholar
- 27.Olmos JM, Hernandez JL, Gonzalez JL, Martinez J, Pariente E, Sierra I et al (2017) Predictive and discriminatory capacity of the frax tool in Spanish postmenopathic women: a preliminary study. Calcif Tissue Int 100(1 Supplement 1):S86Google Scholar
- 28.Orwoll ES, Lapidus J, Wang PY, Vandenput L, Hoffman A, Fink HA, Laughlin GA, Nethander M, Ljunggren Ö, Kindmark A, Lorentzon M, Karlsson MK, Mellström D, Kwok A, Khosla S, Kwok T, Ohlsson C, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Research Group (2017) The limited clinical utility of testosterone, estradiol, and sex hormone binding globulin measurements in the prediction of fracture risk and bone loss in older men. J Bone Miner Res 32(3):633–640PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 29.Reyes Dominguez AI, Sosa Cabrera N, Saavedra Santana P, de Tejada Romero MJG, Jodar Gimeno E, Sosa HM (2017) Assessment of the predictive capacity of the garvan calculator of 10 year risk of fracture in a Spanish population. Revista de Osteoporosis y Metabolismo Mineral 9(2):55–61Google Scholar
- 31.Deeks JJ, Bossuyt PM, Gatsonis C (editors) (2013). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Diagnostic Test Accuracy Version 1.0.0 [updated September 2013]: The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from: http://srdta.cochrane.org/. Accessed 17 Mar 2014
- 39.Viechtbauer W (2010) Conducting meta-analyses in R with the metafor Package. J Stat Softw 36(3):48Google Scholar
- 40.Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression, vol xiii. Wiley, New York, p 307Google Scholar
- 41.Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed 02 Mar 2014
- 44.Ettinger B, Liu H, Blackwell T, Hoffman AR, Ensrud KE, Orwoll ES, Osteoporotic Fracture in Men (MrOS) Research Group (2012) Validation of FRC, a fracture risk assessment tool, in a cohort of older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men (MrOS) study. J Clin Densitom 15(3):334–342PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 56.Ensrud KE, Lui L-Y, Taylor BC, Schousboe JT, Donaldson MG, Fink HA, Cauley JA, Hillier TA, Browner WS, Cummings SR, Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group (2009) A comparison of prediction models for fractures in older women: is more better? Arch Intern Med 169(22):2087–2094PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 57.Rubin KH, Abrahamsen B, Friis-Holmberg T, Hjelmborg JVB, Bech M, Hermann AP, Barkmann R, Glüer CC, Brixen K (2013) Comparison of different screening tools (FRAX, OST, ORAI, OSIRIS, SCORE and age alone) to identify women with increased risk of fracture. A population-based prospective study. Bone. 56(1):16–22PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 58.Langsetmo L, Nguyen TV, Nguyen ND, Kovacs CS, Prior JC, Center JR, Morin S, Josse RG, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Eisman JA, the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study Research Group (2011) Independent external validation of nomograms for predicting risk of low-trauma fracture and hip fracture. CMAJ. 183(2):E107–E114PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 61.Zhang Y, Pasco JA, Kotowicz MA, Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Henry MJ (2011) How well do the frax (AUS) and garvan calculators predict fractures from the Geelong Osteoporosis Study (GOS). IOF Regionals, 2nd Asia-Pacific Osteoporosis and Bone Meeting, ANZBMS Annual Scientific Meeting, with JSBMR Gold Coast, QLD Australia: Springer London. S548Google Scholar
- 65.Hundrup YA, Jacobsen RK, Andreasen AH, Davidsen M, Obel EB, Abrahamsen B. Performance of BMD-independent risk scores adapted from the WHI and FRAX(R) collaborations in prediction of 5-year risk of hip fracture: The Danish nurses cohort. 36th European Symposium on Calcified Tissues; Vienna Austria: Elsevier Inc.; 2009. p. S397Google Scholar
- 66.Albaba M, editor (2014) Is HIP fracture risk assessment index (HFRAI), an electronic medical database derived tool, comparable to the world health organization fracture assessment tool (FRAX) in subjects without known femoral neck bone mineral density? 2014 Annual scientific meeting of the American Geriatrics Society. Orlando: Blackwell Publishing Inc.Google Scholar
- 67.Cauley J, LaCroix AZ, Wu C, Lewis B, Wactawski-Wende J, Masaki K et al (2010) FRAX: does fracture prediction differ by race/ethnicity? 32nd annual meeting of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Wiley-Blackwell, Toronto, ON CanadaGoogle Scholar
- 70.Tanaka S, Yoshimura N, Kuroda T, Hosoi T, Saito M, Shiraki M (2010) The fracture and immobilization score (FRISC) for risk assessment of osteoporotic fracture and immobilization in postmenopausal women—a joint analysis of the Nagano, Miyama, and Taiji cohorts. Bone. 47(6):1064–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 72.Collins GS, Mallett S, Altman DG (2011) Predicting risk of osteoporotic and hip fracture in the United Kingdom: prospective independent and external validation of QFractureScores. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 342:d3651Google Scholar
- 73.Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2009) Predicting risk of osteoporotic fracture in men and women in England and Wales: prospective derivation and validation of QFractureScores. BMJ (Clinical research ed) 339:b4229Google Scholar
- 78.Sambrook PN, Flahive J, Hooven FH, Boonen S, Chapurlat R, Lindsay R, Nguyen TV, Díez-Perez A, Pfeilschifter J, Greenspan SL, Hosmer D, Netelenbos JC, Adachi JD, Watts NB, Cooper C, Roux C, Rossini M, Siris ES, Silverman S, Saag KG, Compston JE, LaCroix A, Gehlbach S (2011) Predicting fractures in an international cohort using risk factor algorithms without BMD. J Bone Miner Res 26(11):2770–2777PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar