Prediction of incident vertebral fracture using CT-based finite element analysis
- 139 Downloads
Prior studies show vertebral strength from computed tomography-based finite element analysis may be associated with vertebral fracture risk. We found vertebral strength had a strong association with new vertebral fractures, suggesting that vertebral strength measures identify those at risk for vertebral fracture and may be a useful clinical tool.
We aimed to determine the association between vertebral strength by quantitative computed tomography (CT)-based finite element analysis (FEA) and incident vertebral fracture (VF). In addition, we examined sensitivity and specificity of previously proposed diagnostic thresholds for fragile bone strength and low BMD in predicting VF.
In a case-control study, 26 incident VF cases (13 men, 13 women) and 62 age- and sex-matched controls aged 50 to 85 years were selected from the Framingham multi-detector computed tomography cohort. Vertebral compressive strength, integral vBMD, trabecular vBMD, CT-based BMC, and CT-based aBMD were measured from CT scans of the lumbar spine.
Lower vertebral strength at baseline was associated with an increased risk of new or worsening VF after adjusting for age, BMI, and prevalent VF status (odds ratio (OR) = 5.2 per 1 SD decrease, 95% CI 1.3–19.8). Area under receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve comparisons revealed that vertebral strength better predicted incident VF than CT-based aBMD (AUC = 0.804 vs. 0.715, p = 0.05) but was not better than integral vBMD (AUC = 0.815) or CT-based BMC (AUC = 0.794). Additionally, proposed fragile bone strength thresholds trended toward better sensitivity for identifying VF than that of aBMD-classified osteoporosis (0.46 vs. 0.23, p = 0.09).
This study shows an association between vertebral strength measures and incident vertebral fracture in men and women. Though limited by a small sample size, our findings also suggest that bone strength estimates by CT-based FEA provide equivalent or better ability to predict incident vertebral fracture compared to CT-based aBMD. Our study confirms that CT-based estimates of vertebral strength from FEA are useful for identifying patients who are at high risk for vertebral fracture.
KeywordsBone strength Finite element analysis Fracture prediction Incident vertebral fracture
The contents are solely the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily represent the views of the NIH. We acknowledge Dr. Harry K. Genant’s contribution in reviewing vertebral fracture assessment.
This work was supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health (R01 AR053986, R00 AG042458, R01 AG041658, R01 AR041398), and by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) Framingham Heart Study (NIH/NHLBI Contract N01-HC-25195).
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Brett T. Allaire, Darlene Lu, Fjola Johannesdottir, Mohamed Jarraya, Ali Guermazi, Miriam A. Bredella, Elizabeth J. Samelson, Douglas P. Kiel, Dennis E.Anderson, Serkalem Demissie, and Mary L. Bouxsein declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Dr. Keaveny has been a consultant for Amgen, AgNovos Healthcare, and O.N. Diagnostics and has equity in O.N. Diagnostics. Drs. Keaveny and Kopperdahl have financial interests in O.N. Diagnostics and both they and the company may benefit from the results of this work.
- 3.Cosman F, Krege JH, Looker AC, Schousboe JT, Fan B, Sarafrazi Isfahani N, Shepherd JA, Krohn KD, Steiger P, Wilson KE, Genant HK (2017) Spine fracture prevalence in a nationally representative sample of US women and men aged ≥40 years: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014. Osteoporos Int 28:1857–1866. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3948-9 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 7.Orwoll ES, Marshall LM, Nielson CM, Cummings SR, Lapidus J, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Lane N, Hoffmann PR, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Group (2009) Finite element analysis of the proximal femur and hip fracture risk in older men. J Bone Miner Res 2424:475–483. https://doi.org/10.1359/JBMR.081201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Imai K, Ohnishi I, Bessho M, Nakamura K (2006) Nonlinear finite element model predicts vertebral bone strength and fracture site. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31:1789–1794. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.brs.0000225993.57349.df CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wang X, Sanyal A, Cawthon PM, Palermo L, Jekir M, Christensen J, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR, Orwoll E, Black DM, for the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group, Keaveny TM (2012) Prediction of new clinical vertebral fractures in elderly men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res 27:808–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.1539 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 13.Graeff C, Marin F, Petto H, Kayser O, Reisinger A, Peña J, Zysset P, Glüer CC (2013) High resolution quantitative computed tomography-based assessment of trabecular microstructure and strength estimates by finite-element analysis of the spine, but not DXA, reflects vertebral fracture status in men with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Bone 52:568–577. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2012.10.036 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 15.Imai K, Ohnishi I, Matsumoto T, Yamamoto S, Nakamura K (2009) Assessment of vertebral fracture risk and therapeutic effects of alendronate in postmenopausal women using a quantitative computed tomography-based nonlinear finite element method. Osteoporos Int 20:801–810. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0750-8 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 17.Kopperdahl DL, Aspelund T, Hoffmann PF, Sigurdsson S, Siggeirsdottir K, Harris TB, Gudnason V, Keaveny TM (2014) Assessment of incident spine and hip fractures in women and men using finite element analysis of CT scans. J Bone Miner Res 29:570–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2069 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 18.Hoffmann U, Massaro JM, Fox CS, Manders E, O'Donnell CJ (2008) Defining normal distributions of coronary artery calcium in women and men from the Framingham heart study. Am J Cardiol 102:1136–1141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2008.06.038.Defining CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 20.Splansky GL, Corey D, Yang Q, Atwood LD, Cupples LA, Benjamin EJ, D'Agostino RB, Fox CS, Larson MG, Murabito JM, O'Donnell CJ, Vasan RS, Wolf PA, Levy D (2007) The third generation cohort of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute’s Framingham heart study: design, recruitment, and initial examination. Am J Epidemiol 165:1328–1335. https://doi.org/10.1093/aje/kwm021 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 24.Yau MS, Demissie S, Zhou Y, Anderson DE, Lorbergs AL, Kiel DP, Allaire BT, Yang L, Cupples LA, Travison TG, Bouxsein ML, Karasik D, Samelson EJ (2016) Heritability of thoracic spine curvature and genetic correlations with other spine traits: the Framingham study. J Bone Miner Res 31:2077–2084. https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.2925 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 25.Keaveny TM, Donley DW, Hoffmann PF, Mitlak BH, Glass EV, San Martin JA (2007) Effects of teriparatide and alendronate on vertebral strength as assessed by finite element modeling of QCT scans in women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 22:149–157. https://doi.org/10.1359/jbmr.061011 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 29.Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM (2008) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:123–162. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2007.12.010 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 30.Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S (2013) Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom 16:455–466. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocd.2013.08.004 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 35.Keyak JH, Sigurdsson S, Karlsdottir G, Oskarsdottir D, Sigmarsdottir A, Zhao S, Kornak J, Harris TB, Sigurdsson G, Jonsson BY, Siggeirsdottir K, Eiriksdottir G, Gudnason V, Lang TF (2011) Male-female differences in the association between incident hip fracture and proximal femur strength: a finite element analysis study. Bone 48:1239–1245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2011.03.682.Male-female CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 37.Weber NK, Fidler JL, Keaveny TM, Clarke BL, Khosla S, Fletcher JG, Lee DC, Pardi DS, Loftus EV, Kane SV, Barlow JM, Murthy NS, Becker BD, Bruining DH (2014) Validation of a CT-derived method for osteoporosis screening in IBD patients undergoing contrast-enhanced CT enterography. Am J Gastroenterol 109:401–408. https://doi.org/10.1038/ajg.2013.478 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 40.Adams A, Fischer H, Kopperdahl D et al (2017) The fracture, osteoporosis, and CT utilization study (FOCUS)—utilizing pre-existing CT to assess risk of hip fracture in a large real-world clinical setting. J Bone Miner Res 32(Suppl):1Google Scholar
- 42.Anderson DE, Demissie S, Allaire BT, Bruno AG, Kopperdahl DL, Keaveny TM, Kiel DP, Bouxsein ML (2014) The associations between QCT-based vertebral bone measurements and prevalent vertebral fractures depend on the spinal locations of both bone measurement and fracture. Osteoporos Int 25:559–566. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2452-0 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar