Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 155–166 | Cite as

Impact of mild and moderate/severe vertebral fractures on physical activity: a prospective study of older women in the UK

  • U.A. Al-SariEmail author
  • J.H. Tobias
  • E.M. Clark
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Little is known about the long-term impact of vertebral fractures on physical activity. There is also uncertainty over the clinical significance of mild vertebral fracture. We showed that women with moderate/severe but not mild vertebral fracture do less walking duration and housework than those without fracture after 5.4 years of follow-up.

Introduction

Little is known about the long-term impact of vertebral fractures on physical activities. There is also uncertainty over the clinical significance of mild fracture. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the prospective association between vertebral fracture and future physical activity.

Methods

This is a 5-year prospective study of a mixed community and secondary care cohort of women aged > 50 from the UK. Vertebral fractures were identified at baseline on radiographs or DXA-based Vertebral Fracture Assessment by a Quantitative Morphometric approach and defined as moderate/severe (≥ 25% height decrease) or mild (20–24.9% height decrease). Physical activity data were collected 5.4 years later by self-completion questionnaires. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between presence of fracture and various physical activities while adjusting for potential confounders.

Results

Two hundred eighty-six women without, 58 with mild, and 69 with moderate/severe fracture were recruited. Those with mild and moderate/severe fracture were older than women without fracture and had more concomitant diseases at baseline. At 5.4 years follow-up, women with moderate/severe fracture self-reported shorter walking duration compared to those without fracture, even after adjusting for potential confounders (OR 2.96, 95%CI 1.11–7.88, P = 0.030). No independent association was seen between the presence of mild fractures and reduced physical activity at follow-up.

Conclusion

This is the first study of older women from the UK that explored the prospective association between vertebral fracture and physical activity duration. Moderate/severe fractures were associated with reduced walking duration. Mild fractures had no impact on future physical ability.

Keywords

Epidemiology Physical activity Postmenopausal women Vertebral fracture 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank all the research participants for their cooperation in this work.

Authors’ contribution

Data collection and analysed data: UA. Contributed to writing of manuscript: UA and EC. Read and approved final manuscript: all authors.

Funding information

The project was funded by an unrestricted education grant from Republic of Iraq Ministry of Higher Education and Scientific Research (MOHESR).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

198_2018_4692_MOESM1_ESM.docx (17 kb)
ESM 1 (DOCX 17 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Melton LJ 3rd, Chrischilles EA, Cooper C et al (1992) Perspective. How many women have osteoporosis? J Bone Miner Res 7:1005Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    European Prospective Osteoporosis Study, G et al (2002) Incidence of vertebral fracture in europe: results from the European Prospective Osteoporosis Study (EPOS). J Bone Miner Res 17(4):716–724Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Burger H, van Daele PLA, Grashuis K, Hofman A, Grobbee DE, Schütte HE, Birkenhäger JC, Pols HAP (1997) Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 12(1):152–157Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Tosteson AN et al (2001) Impact of hip and vertebral fractures on quality-adjusted life years. Osteoporos Int 12(12):1042–1049Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Al-Sari UA, Tobias J, Clark E (2016) Health-related quality of life in older people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 27(10):2891–2900Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Al-Sari UA, Tobias JH, Clark EM (2018) Self-reported everyday physical activities in older people with osteoporotic vertebral fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 29(1):19–29Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Edmond SL, Kiel DP, Samelson EJ, Kelly-Hayes M, Felson DT (2005) Vertebral deformity, back symptoms, and functional limitations among older women: the Framingham Study. Osteoporos Int 16(9):1086–1095Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 156(21):2469–2475Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    O’Neill TW et al (2004) Back pain, disability, and radiographic vertebral fracture in European women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 15(9):760–765Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silverman SL, Nasser K, Nattrass S, Drinkwater B (2012) Impact of bone turnover markers and/or educational information on persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy: a community setting-based trial. Osteoporos Int 23(3):1069–1074Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, Harper KD, Xie S, on behalf of the Health-Related Quality of Life Subgroup of the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. Arthritis Rheum 44(11):2611–2619Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crans GG, Silverman SL, Genant HK, Glass EV, Krege JH (2004) Association of severe vertebral fractures with reduced quality of life: reduction in the incidence of severe vertebral fractures by teriparatide. Arthritis Rheum 50(12):4028–4034Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Griffith JF (2015) Identifying osteoporotic vertebral fracture. Quant Imaging Med Surg 5(4):592–602Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Briot K, Cropet C, Liu-Léage S, Marcelli C (2008) Inverse relationship between vertebral fractures and spine osteoarthritis in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Ann Rheum Dis 67(2):224–228Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Matthis C, Weber U, O’[Neill TW, Raspe H (1998) Health impact associated with vertebral deformities: results from the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study (EVOS). Osteoporos Int 8(4):364–372Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Clark EM, Gould V, Morrison L, Ades AE, Dieppe P, Tobias JH (2012) Randomized controlled trial of a primary care-based screening program to identify older women with prevalent osteoporotic vertebral fractures: Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). J Bone Miner Res 27(3):664–671Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosenkranz RR, Kolt GS, Berentson-Shaw J (2013) A review of enablers and barriers to physical activity participation among older people of New Zealand and international populations. Int Sports Med J 14:294–312Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark EM, Carter L, Gould VC, Morrison L, Tobias JH (2014) Vertebral fracture assessment (VFA) by lateral DXA scanning may be cost-effective when used as part of fracture liaison services or primary care screening. Osteoporos Int 25(3):953–964Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark EM, Gooberman-Hill R, Peters TJ (2016) Using self-reports of pain and other variables to distinguish between older women with back pain due to vertebral fractures and those with back pain due to degenerative changes. Osteoporos Int 27(4):1459–1467Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clark EM, Gould VC, Morrison L, Masud T, Tobias J (2012) Determinants of fracture risk in a UK-population-based cohort of older women: a cross-sectional analysis of the Cohort for Skeletal Health in Bristol and Avon (COSHIBA). Age Ageing 41(1):46–52Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barnett E, Nordin BEC (1960) The radiological diagnosis of osteoporosis: a new approach. Clin Radiol 11(3):166–174Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jiang G, Ferrar L, Barrington NA, Eastell R (2007) Standardised quantitative morphometry: a modified approach for quantitative identification of prevalent vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 18(10):1411–1419Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cohen J (1960) A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas 20:37–46Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Samelson EJ, Christiansen BA, Demissie S, Broe KE, Zhou Y, Meng CA, Yu W, Cheng X, O’Donnell CJ, Hoffmann U, Genant HK, Kiel DP, Bouxsein ML (2011) Reliability of vertebral fracture assessment using multidetector CT lateral scout views: the Framingham Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 22(4):1123–1131Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cawthon PM, Haslam J, Fullman R, Peters KW, Black D, Ensrud KE, Cummings SR, Orwoll ES, Barrett-Connor E, Marshall L, Steiger P, Schousboe JT, Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Research Group (2014) Methods and reliability of radiographic vertebral fracture detection in older men: the osteoporotic fractures in men study. Bone 67:152–155Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Fleiss JL (1981) Statistical methods for rates and proportions, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York ISBN 0-471-26370-2Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Shaper AG, Wannamethee G, Weatherall R (1991) Physical activity and ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged British men. Br Heart J 66(5):384–394Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Jefferis BJ, Sartini C, Ash S, Lennon LT, Wannamethee SG, Whincup PH (2016) Validity of questionnaire-based assessment of sedentary behaviour and physical activity in a population-based cohort of older men; comparisons with objectively measured physical activity data. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 13:14Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elhakeem A, Hannam K, Deere KC, Hartley A, Clark EM, Moss C, Edwards MH, Dennison E, Gaysin T, Kuh D, Wong A, Cooper C, Cooper R, Tobias JH (2018) Physical activity producing low, but not medium or higher, vertical impacts is inversely related to BMI in older adults: findings from a multicohort study. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 73(5):643–651Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wolff JL, Starfield B, Anderson G (2002) Prevalence, expenditures, and complications of multiple chronic conditions in the elderly. Arch Intern Med 162(20):2269–2276Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stackelberg O, Bjorck M, Larsson SC, Orsini N, Wolk A (2014) Alcohol consumption, specific alcoholic beverages, and abdominal aortic aneurysm. Circulation 130(8):646–652Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Weiss DR, O’Loughlin JL, Platt RW, Paradis G (2007) Five-year predictors of physical activity decline among adults in low-income communities: a prospective study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 4(1):2Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Greenland S (1989) Modeling and variable selection in epidemiologic analysis. Am J Public Health 79(3):340–349Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Salaffi F, Cimmino MA, Malavolta N, Carotti M, di Matteo L, Scendoni P, Grassi W, Italian Multicentre Osteoporotic Fracture Study Group (2007) The burden of prevalent fractures on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: the IMOF study. J Rheumatol 34(7):1551–1560Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, Horlait S, Orcel P, Roux C (2005) The severity of vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2175–2179Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Greendale GA, Barrett-Connor E, Ingles S, Haile R (1995) Late physical and functional effects of osteoporotic fracture in women: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Am Geriatr Soc 43(9):955–961Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128(10):793–800Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Nevitt MC, Cummings SR, Stone KL, Palermo L, Black DM, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Hochberg MC, Ensrud KE, Hillier TA, Cauley JA (2005) Risk factors for a first-incident radiographic vertebral fracture in women > or = 65 years of age: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20(1):131–140Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Ettinger B, Block JE, Smith R, Cummings SR, Harris ST, Genant HK (1988) An examination of the association between vertebral deformities, physical disabilities and psychosocial problems. Maturitas 10(4):283–296Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ettinger B, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Rundle AC, Cauley JA, Cummings SR, Genant HK (1992) Contribution of vertebral deformities to chronic back pain and disability. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 7(4):449–456Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ross PD, Ettinger B, Davis JW, Melton LJ III, Wasnich RD (1991) Evaluation of adverse health outcomes associated with vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 1(3):134–140Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Hassett G, Hart DJ, Doyle DV, March L, Spector TD (2006) The relation between progressive osteoarthritis of the knee and long term progression of osteoarthritis of the hand, hip, and lumbar spine. Ann Rheum Dis 65(5):623–628Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Suzuki N, Ogikubo O, Hansson T (2009) The prognosis for pain, disability, activities of daily living and quality of life after an acute osteoporotic vertebral body fracture: its relation to fracture level, type of fracture and grade of fracture deformation. Eur Spine J 18(1):77–88Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Wong CC, McGirt MJ (2013) Vertebral compression fractures: a review of current management and multimodal therapy. J Multidiscip Healthc 6:205–214Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Academic Rheumatology, Musculoskeletal Research Unit, Bristol Medical School, Southmead HospitalUniversity of BristolBristolUK
  2. 2.Department of Medicine, College of MedicineWasit UniversityKutIraq

Personalised recommendations