Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 30, Issue 1, pp 241–249 | Cite as

Impaired residual renal function predicts denosumab-induced serum calcium decrement as well as increment of bone mineral density in non-severe renal insufficiency

  • D. Miyaoka
  • Y. ImanishiEmail author
  • M. Ohara
  • N. Hayashi
  • Y. Nagata
  • S. Yamada
  • K. Mori
  • M. Emoto
  • M. Inaba
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Denosumab treatment of osteoporotic patients, except those with severe renal insufficiency, reduced cCa levels. Low baseline cCa, low estimated glomerular filtration rate, and high bone turnover increased the risk of lower cCa, while increasing bone mineral density. Pretreatment with antiresorptive agents was beneficial in reducing the risk of hypocalcemia.

Introduction

Although denosumab-induced hypocalcemia has been frequently observed in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stages 4–5D being treated with denosumab for osteoporosis, few studies have assessed the risk factors for serum-corrected calcium (cCa) reductions in patients with non-severe renal insufficiency. This study assessed the risk factors for reduced cCa concentration following denosumab administration and analyzed factors predictive of changes in bone mineral density (BMD).

Methods

Seventy-seven osteoporotic patients, not including those with CKD stages 4–5D, were treated with 60 mg denosumab once every 6 months. Biochemical parameters and BMD were analyzed from prior to the initial dose until 1 month after the second dose.

Results

Following the first administration of denosumab, cCa levels decreased, reaching a minimum on day 7. Multiple linear regression analyses showed that baseline cCa, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2, tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase-5b (TRACP-5b), and bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP) or pretreatment with antiresorptive agents were significant factors independently associated with the absolute reduction in cCa from baseline to day 7 (ΔcCa0–7 days). ΔcCa0–7 days after the second dose of denosumab was significantly lower than that after the first dose. After 6 months of denosumab treatment, both LS-BMD and FN-BMD significantly increased from baseline. LS-BMD and FN-BMD correlated significantly with baseline TRACP-5b or BAP and eGFR, respectively.

Conclusions

Both low eGFR and high bone turnover were independent risk factors for denosumab-induced cCa decrement, and for increases in BMD. Pretreatment with antiresorptive agents may reduce the risk of hypocalcemia.

Keywords

Antiresorptive agent Bone turnover Chronic kidney disease Denosumab Hypocalcemia Osteoporosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

DM contributed to the acquisition, analysis, and interpretation of the data. YI, ME, and MI contributed to the conception and design of the study. MO, NH, YN, SY, and KM contributed to the acquisition of the data. DM took responsibility for the integrity of the data analysis. All authors participated in drafting or revising the manuscript and approved the final version of the manuscript for submission.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest

MI received grant support and lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Limited. YI, KM, EM, and MI received lecture fees from Daiichi Sankyo Co., Limited. DM, MO, NH, YN, and SY have no conflicts of interest to report.

Human and animal rights and informed consent

All participants provided written informed consent. The study protocol was approved by the institutional ethics committee of Osaka City University Graduate School of Medicine. This study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.

References

  1. 1.
    Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C (2012) Derivation and validation of updated QFracture algorithm to predict risk of osteoporotic fracture in primary care in the United Kingdom: prospective open cohort study. BMJ 344:e3427Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gasparini A, Evans M, Coresh J, Grams ME, Norin O, Qureshi AR, Runesson B, Barany P, Ärnlöv J, Jernberg T, Wettermark B, Elinder CG, Carrero JJ (2016) Prevalence and recognition of chronic kidney disease in Stockholm healthcare. Nephrol Dial Transplant 31(12):2086–2094Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C, FREEDOM Trial (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361(8):756–765Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bone HG, Wagman RB, Brandi ML, Brown JP, Chapurlat R, Cummings SR, Czerwiński E, Fahrleitner-Pammer A, Kendler DL, Lippuner K, Reginster JY, Roux C, Malouf J, Bradley MN, Daizadeh NS, Wang A, Dakin P, Pannacciulli N, Dempster DW, Papapoulos S (2017) 10 years of denosumab treatment in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the phase 3 randomised FREEDOM trial and open-label extension. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 5(7):513–523Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Jamal SA, Ljunggren O, Stehman-Breen C, Cummings SR, McClung MR, Goemaere S, Ebeling PR, Franek E, Yang YC, Egbuna OI, Boonen S, Miller PD (2011) Effects of denosumab on fracture and bone mineral density by level of kidney function. J Bone Miner Res 26(8):1829–1835Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dave V, Chiang CY, Booth J, Mount PF (2015) Hypocalcemia post denosumab in patients with chronic kidney disease stage 4-5. Am J Nephrol 41(2):129–137Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huynh AL, Baker ST, Stewardson AJ, Johnson DF (2016) Denosumab-associated hypocalcaemia: incidence, severity and patient characteristics in a tertiary hospital setting. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 25(11):1274–1278Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Okada N, Kawazoe K, Teraoka K, Kujime T, Abe M, Shinohara Y, Minakuchi K (2013) Identification of the risk factors associated with hypocalcemia induced by denosumab. Biol Pharm Bull 36(10):1622–1626Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ikesue H, Tsuji T, Hata K, Watanabe H, Mishima K, Uchida M, Egashira N, Miyamoto T, Baba E, Akashi K, Takayama K, Nakanishi Y, Tokunaga E, Okamoto T, Maehara Y, Yokomizo A, Naito S, Kubo M, Tanaka M, Masuda S (2014) Time course of calcium concentrations and risk factors for hypocalcemia in patients receiving Denosumab for the treatment of bone metastases from Cancer. Ann Pharmacother 48(9):1159–1165Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Imai E, Horio M, Nitta K, Yamagata K, Iseki K, Tsukamoto Y, Ito S, Makino H, Hishida A, Matsuo S (2007) Modification of the modification of diet in renal disease (MDRD) study equation for Japan. Am J Kidney Dis 50(6):927–937Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gao P, Scheibel S, D'Amour P, John MR, Rao SD, Schmidt-Gayk H, Cantor TL (2001) Development of a novel immunoradiometric assay exclusively for biologically active whole parathyroid hormone 1-84: implications for improvement of accurate assessment of parathyroid function. J Bone Miner Res 16(4):605–614Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Miyauchi A, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Tsujimoto M, Warner MR, Nakamura T (2010) Effects of teriparatide on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese subjects with osteoporosis at high risk of fracture in a 24-month clinical study: 12-month, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind and 12-month open-label phases. Bone 47(3):493–502Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nishizawa Y, Inaba M, Ishii M, Yamashita H, Miki T, Goto H, Yamada S, Chaki O, Kurasawa K, Mochizuki Y (2008) Reference intervals of serum tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase type 5b activity measured with a novel assay in Japanese subjects. J Bone Miner Metab 26(3):265–270Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okuno S, Inaba M, Kitatani K, Ishimura E, Yamakawa T, Nishizawa Y (2005) Serum levels of C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen: a useful new marker of cortical bone loss in hemodialysis patients. Osteoporos Int 16(5):501–509Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Shidara K, Inaba M, Okuno S, Yamada S, Kumeda Y, Imanishi Y, Yamakawa T, Ishimura E, Nishizawa Y (2008) Serum levels of TRAP5b, a new bone resorption marker unaffected by renal dysfunction, as a useful marker of cortical bone loss in hemodialysis patients. Calcif Tissue Int 82(4):278–287Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis the study of osteoporotic fractures research group. J Bone Miner Res 11(7):984–996Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Block GA, Bone HG, Fang L, Lee E, Padhi D (2012) A single-dose study of denosumab in patients with various degrees of renal impairment. J Bone Miner Res 27(7):1471–1479Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nakamura T, Matsumoto T, Sugimoto T, Shiraki M (2012) Dose-response study of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in Japanese postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 23(3):1131–1140Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Hiramatsu R, Ubara Y, Sawa N, Hoshino J, Hasegawa E, Kawada M, Imafuku A, Sumida K, Mise K, Hayami N, Suwabe T, Takaichi K (2015) Denosumab for low bone mass in hemodialysis patients: a noncontrolled trial. Am J Kidney Dis 66(1):175–177Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ishikawa K, Nagai T, Sakamoto K, Ohara K, Eguro T, Ito H, Toyoshima Y, Kokaze A, Toyone T, Inagaki K (2016) High bone turnover elevates the risk of denosumab-induced hypocalcemia in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Ther Clin Risk Manag 12:1831–1840Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Chen J, Smerdely P (2017) Hypocalcaemia after denosumab in older people following fracture. Osteoporos Int 28(2):517–522Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Body JJ, Bone HG, de Boer RH, Stopeck A, van Poznak C, Damião R, Fizazi K, Henry DH, Ibrahim T, Lipton A, Saad F, Shore N, Takano T, Shaywitz AJ, Wang H, Bracco OL, Braun A, Kostenuik PJ (2015) Hypocalcaemia in patients with metastatic bone disease treated with denosumab. Eur J Cancer 51(13):1812–1821Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Watanabe K, Tominari T, Hirata M, Matsumoto C, Hirata J, Murphy G, Nagase H, Miyaura C, Inada M (2017) Indoxyl sulfate, a uremic toxin in chronic kidney disease, suppresses both bone formation and bone resorption. FEBS Open Bio 7(8):1178–1185Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cochran M, Coates PT, Morris HA (2005) The effect of calcitriol on fasting urine calcium loss and renal tubular reabsorption of calcium in patients with mild renal failure--actions of a permissive hormone. Clin Nephrol 64(2):98–102Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Phelps KR, Stote KS, Mason D (2014) Tubular calcium reabsorption and other aspects of calcium homeostasis in primary and secondary hyperparathyroidism. Clin Nephrol 82(2):83–91Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Cozzolino M, Gallieni M, Brancaccio D, Arcidiacono T, Bianchi G, Vezzoli G (2006) Vitamin D retains an important role in the pathogenesis and management of secondary hyperparathyroidism in chronic renal failure. J Nephrol 19(5):566–577Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Viaene L, Meijers BK, Vanrenterghem Y, Evenepoel P (2012) Evidence in favor of a severely impaired net intestinal calcium absorption in patients with (early-stage) chronic kidney disease. Am J Nephrol 35(5):434–441Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Armas LA, Zena M, Lund R, Heaney RP (2013) Calcium absorption response to cholecalciferol supplementation in hemodialysis. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol 8(6):1003–1008Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Hoenderop JG, Nilius B, Bindels RJ (2005) Calcium absorption across epithelia. Physiol Rev 85(1):373–422Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kinoshita Y, Arai M, Ito N, Takashi Y, Makita N, Nangaku M, Shinoda Y, Fukumoto S (2016) High serum ALP level is associated with increased risk of denosumab-related hypocalcemia in patients with bone metastases from solid tumors. Endocr J 63(5):479–484Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Brasier AR, Nussbaum SR (1988) Hungry bone syndrome: clinical and biochemical predictors of its occurrence after parathyroid surgery. Am J Med 84(4):654–660Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Body JJ, Niepel D, Tonini G (2017) Hypercalcaemia and hypocalcaemia: finding the balance. Support Care Cancer 25(5):1639–1649Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Nenonen A, Cheng S, Ivaska KK, Alatalo SL, Lehtimäki T, Schmidt-Gayk H, Uusi-Rasi K, Heinonen A, Kannus P, Sievänen H, Vuori I, Väänänen HK, Halleen JM (2005) Serum TRACP 5b is a useful marker for monitoring alendronate treatment: comparison with other markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res 20(10):1804–1812Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hansdottir H, Franzson L, Prestwood K, Sigurdsson G (2004) The effect of raloxifene on markers of bone turnover in older women living in long-term care facilities. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(5):779–783Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Tsai JN, Uihlein AV, Lee H, Kumbhani R, Siwila-Sackman E, McKay EA, Burnett-Bowie SA, Neer RM, Leder BZ (2013) Teriparatide and denosumab, alone or combined, in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: the DATA study randomised trial. Lancet 382(9886):50–56Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eastell R, Christiansen C, Grauer A, Kutilek S, Libanati C, McClung MR, Reid IR, Resch H, Siris E, Uebelhart D, Wang A, Weryha G, Cummings SR (2011) Effects of denosumab on bone turnover markers in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 26(3):530–537Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Tsai JN, Burnett-Bowie SM, Lee H, Leder BZ (2017) Relationship between bone turnover and density with teriparatide, denosumab or both in women in the DATA study. Bone 95:20–25Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Cheng BC, Chen YC (2017) Young patients and those with a low eGFR benefitted more from denosumab therapy in femoral neck bone mineral density. Clin Rheumatol 36(4):929–932Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Petranova T, Sheytanov I, Monov S, Nestorova R, Rashkov R (2014) Denosumab improves bone mineral density and microarchitecture and reduces bone pain in women with osteoporosis with and without glucocorticoid treatment. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip 28(6):1127–1137Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ellis GK, Bone HG, Chlebowski R, Paul D, Spadafora S, Smith J, Fan M, Jun S (2008) Randomized trial of denosumab in patients receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitors for nonmetastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 26(30):4875–4882Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Gnant M, Pfeiler G, Dubsky PC, Hubalek M, Greil R, Jakesz R, Wette V, Balic M, Haslbauer F, Melbinger E, Bjelic-Radisic V, Artner-Matuschek S, Fitzal F, Marth C, Sevelda P, Mlineritsch B, Steger GG, Manfreda D, Exner R, Egle D, Bergh J, Kainberger F, Talbot S, Warner D, Fesl C, Singer CF (2015) Adjuvant denosumab in breast cancer (ABCSG-18): a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Lancet 386(9992):433–443Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Anastasilakis AD, Polyzos SA, Efstathiadou ZA, Savvidis M, Sakellariou GT, Papatheodorou A, Kokkoris P, Makras P (2015) Denosumab in treatment-naive and pre-treated with zoledronic acid postmenopausal women with low bone mass: effect on bone mineral density and bone turnover markers. Metabolism 64(10):1291–1297Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Kamimura M, Nakamura Y, Ikegami S, Uchiyama S, Kato H, Taguchi A (2017) Significant improvement of bone mineral density and bone turnover markers by denosumab therapy in bisphosphonate-unresponsive patients: response to comments. Osteoporos Int 28(5):1757–1758Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Metabolism, Endocrinology and Molecular MedicineOsaka City University Graduate School of MedicineOsakaJapan

Personalised recommendations