Pregnancy and newborn outcomes after exposure to bisphosphonates: a case-control study
We analyzed women and newborn outcome after maternal exposure to BPs. BPs have no teratogenic effect on the 36 analyzed pregnancies compared to unexposed controls matched on women underlying diseases (either systemic disease, either “bone” disease) but some outcome differed: neonatal complications rate in systemic diseases and live birth rate in bone diseases).
The effect of bisphosphonates (BPs) during pregnancy remains unclear. We aimed to study pregnancy outcomes in women exposed to BPs during pregnancy.
Data for cases and controls were from the French Reference Centre of Teratogenic Agents. Cases were women who received BPs in the 6 weeks before or during a pregnancy and had systemic or bone diseases. We included two respectively matched control groups: women with systemic diseases not exposed to BPs and healthy women not exposed to BPs or any teratogenic agent. Four controls were assigned to each case.
Thirty-six women were exposed to BPs including 5 just before pregnancy and 30 during the first trimester; 23 had systemic diseases (systemic lupus erythematosus, n = 5; rheumatoid arthritis, n = 5; other, n = 13) and 13 had bone diseases. Rate of observed congenital malformations did not differ in women with a systemic or a bone disease compared to their respective controls (respectively 2/23 [8.7%] vs 2/92 [2.2%], p = 0.178 and 0/13 [0%] vs 0/52 [0%], p = 1.00). Among women with systemic diseases, non-specific neonatal complications were more frequent for cases (4/16 [25.0%] vs 4/64 [6.3%], p = 0.027). Among women with bone disorders, the live birth rate was lower for cases than healthy controls (8/10 [80%] vs 50/50 [100%], p = 0.025).
We found no major teratogenic effects of BPs, but rates of neonatal complications were increased for women with systemic diseases, as were spontaneous abortions for women with bone diseases likely linked to the severity of the underlying diseases and concomitant medications.
KeywordsBisphosphonates Osteoporosis Pregnancy Teratogenicity
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflicts of interest
Aurélien Sokal, Tifenn Leturcq, Delphine Beghin, and Xavier Mariette declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Raphaele Seror received consulting fees from Roche and Novartis.
- 3.Grossman JM, Gordon R, Ranganath VK, Deal C, Caplan L, Chen W, Curtis JR, Furst DE, McMahon M, Patkar NM, Volkmann E, Saag KG (2010) American College of Rheumatology 2010 recommendations for the prevention and treatment of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis. Arthritis Care Res 62(11):1515–1526CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 5.Drake MT, Clarke BL, Khosla S (2008) Bisphosphonates: mechanism of action and role in clinical practice. In: Mayo Clinic proceedings. Elsevier, pp 1032–1045Google Scholar
- 6.Lin JH, Duggan DE, Chen I-W, Ellsworth RL (1991) Physiological disposition of alendronate, a potent anti-osteolytic bisphosphonate, in laboratory animals. Drug Metab Dispos 19(5):926–932Google Scholar
- 7.Black DM, Delmas PD, Eastell R, Reid IR, Boonen S, Cauley JA, Cosman F, Lakatos P, Leung PC, Man Z, Mautalen C, Mesenbrink P, Hu H, Caminis J, Tong K, Rosario-Jansen T, Krasnow J, Hue TF, Sellmeyer D, Eriksen EF, Cummings SR, HORIZON Pivotal Fracture Trial (2007) Once-yearly zoledronic acid for treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 356(18):1809–1822CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Khan SA, Kanis JA, Vasikaran S, Kline WF, Matuszewski BK, McCloskey EV, Beneton MNC, Gertz BJ, Sciberras DG, Holland SD, Orgee J, Coombes GM, Rogers SR, Porras AG (1997) Elimination and biochemical responses to intravenous alendronate in postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 12(10):1700–1707CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 11.McKenzie AF, Budd RS, Yang C, Shapiro B, Hicks RJ (1994) Technetium-99m-methylene diphosphonate uptake in the fetal skeleton at 30 weeks gestation. J Nucl Med 35(8):1338–1341Google Scholar