Advertisement

Lower grip strength and dynamic body balance in women with distal radial fractures

  • K. FujitaEmail author
  • H. Kaburagi
  • A. Nimura
  • T. Miyamoto
  • Y. Wakabayashi
  • Y. Seki
  • H. Aoyama
  • H. Shimura
  • R. Kato
  • A. Okawa
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

In this case-control study, we concluded that women with distal radial fractures who were surgically treated showed lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing than those of controls. These results suggest that measurements of grip strength and dynamic body balance may be useful screening tools to assess future fracture risk.

Introduction

Patients with distal radial fractures (DRFs) are at risk of future fragility fractures. However, their physical characteristics and tendencies for falls remain unclear. We aimed to compare the physical characteristics of women with and without distal radial fractures.

Methods

We included 128 women with a DRF as their first fragility fracture (fracture group) who underwent surgical treatment. Concurrently, 128 age- and sex-matched participants without a history of fragility fractures were selected as controls (control group). The participants underwent assessments of grip strength and the body balancing ability test. Measurements were taken twice in the fracture group, at 2 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, and once in the control group. The body balancing ability test included the Functional Reach Test, Timed Up and Go test (TUG), 2-Step test (2ST), and Timed Uni-pedal Stance test. The participants also completed questionnaires about their health.

Results

There were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in patient characteristics between the groups. The fracture group showed lower grip strength across all age groups. In the DRF group, prolonged TUG time was observed at 2 weeks postoperatively in all age groups and at 6 months in participants aged 55–74 years; the 2ST score was significantly lower in participants aged between 65 and 74 years.

Conclusions

Women with DRF demonstrated lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing ability. Lower grip strength and dynamic body balancing ability were identified as significant risk factors in women with DRF, suggesting that these may be useful screening tools to assess fracture risk.

Keywords

Distal radial fracture Fall tendency Grip strength TUG 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We would thank Dr. Y.N. and Dr. Y.M. for collecting data.

Funding

This research was funded by ZENKYOREN.

Compliance with ethical standards

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was approved by the institutional review board of Tokyo Medical and Dental University (M2000-1887).

Informed consent

Written informed consent was provided by all participants.

Conflicts of interest

None.

Supplementary material

198_2018_4816_MOESM1_ESM.docx (115 kb)
Supplementary Figure 1 (DOCX 115 kb)
198_2018_4816_MOESM2_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table 1 (DOCX 15 kb)
198_2018_4816_MOESM3_ESM.docx (16 kb)
Supplementary Table 2 (DOCX 15 kb)
198_2018_4816_MOESM4_ESM.docx (15 kb)
Supplementary Table 3 (DOCX 14 kb)
198_2018_4816_MOESM5_ESM.docx (14 kb)
Supplementary Table 4 (DOCX 14 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Tinetti ME (2003) Clinical practice. Preventing falls in elderly persons. New Engl J Med 348:42–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Poole KE, Compston JE (2006) Osteoporosis and its management. BMJ 333:1251–1256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Black DM, Rosen CJ (2016) Clinical practice. Postmenopausal osteoporosis. New Engl J Med 374:254–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sontag A, Krege JH (2010) First fractures among postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 28:485–488CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Boufous S, Finch C, Lord S, Close J, Gothelf T, Walsh W (2006) The epidemiology of hospitalised wrist fractures in older people, New South Wales, Australia. Bone 39:1144–1148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hagino H, Yamamoto K, Ohshiro H, Nakamura T, Kishimoto H, Nose T (1999) Changing incidence of hip, distal radius, and proximal humerus fractures in Tottori Prefecture, Japan. Bone 24:265–270CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gates S, Fisher JD, Cooke MW, Carter YH, Lamb SE (2008) Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336:130–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Marques A, Ferreira RJ, Santos E, Loza E, Carmona L, da Silva JA (2015) The accuracy of osteoporotic fracture risk prediction tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Rheum Dis 74:1958–1967CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Assessment of fracture risk. Eur J Radiol 71:392–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Oyen J, Gjesdal CG, Brudvik C, Hove LM, Apalset EM, Gulseth HC, Haugeberg G (2010) Low-energy distal radius fractures in middle-aged and elderly men and women--the burden of osteoporosis and fracture risk: a study of 1794 consecutive patients. Osteoporos Int 21:1257–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sakai A, Oshige T, Zenke Y, Yamanaka Y, Otsuka H, Nakamura T (2010) Shorter unipedal standing time and lower bone mineral density in women with distal radius fractures. Osteoporos Int 21:733–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Jarvinen TL, Sievanen H, Khan KM, Heinonen A, Kannus P (2008) Shifting the focus in fracture prevention from osteoporosis to falls. BMJ 336:124–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hida T, Shimokata H, Sakai Y, Ito S, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Kasai T, Ishiguro N, Harada A (2016) Sarcopenia and sarcopenic leg as potential risk factors for acute osteoporotic vertebral fracture among older women. Eur Spine J 25:3424–3431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Steihaug OM, Gjesdal CG, Bogen B, Kristoffersen MH, Lien G, Ranhoff AH (2017) Sarcopenia in patients with hip fracture: a multicenter cross-sectional study. PLoS One 12:e0184780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Bahat G, Bauer J, Boirie Y, Bruyère O, Cederholm T, Cooper C, Landi F, Rolland Y, Sayer AA, Schneider SM, Sieber CC, Topinkova E, Vandewoude M, Visser M, Zamboni M, Writing Group for the European Working Group on Sarcopenia in Older People 2 (EWGSOP2), and the Extended Group for EWGSOP2, Bautmans I, Baeyens JP, Cesari M, Cherubini A, Kanis J, Maggio M, Martin F, Michel JP, Pitkala K, Reginster JY, Rizzoli R, Sánchez-Rodríguez D, Schols J (2018) Sarcopenia: revised European consensus on definition and diagnosis. Age Ageing.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afy169
  16. 16.
    Louer CR, Boone SL, Guthrie AK, Motley JR, Calfee RP, Wall LB (2016) Postural stability in older adults with a distal radial fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 98:1176–1182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hillman TE, Nunes QM, Hornby ST, Stanga Z, Neal KR, Rowlands BJ, Allison SP, Lobo DN (2005) A practical posture for hand grip dynamometry in the clinical setting. Clin Nutr 24:224–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Weiner DK, Duncan PW, Chandler J, Studenski SA (1992) Functional reach: a marker of physical frailty. J Am Geriatr Soc 40:203–207CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Podsiadlo D, Richardson S (1991) The timed “up & go”: a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc 39:142–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Muramoto A, Imagama S, Ito Z, Hirano K, Ishiguro N, Hasegawa Y (2012) Physical performance tests are useful for evaluating and monitoring the severity of locomotive syndrome. J Orthop Sci 17:782–788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rikli R, Busch S (1986) Motor performance of women as a function of age and physical activity level. J Gerontol 41:645–649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Soen S, Fukunaga M, Sugimoto T et al (2013) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2012 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 31:247–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Seccombe K, Ishii-Kuntz M (1991) Perceptions of problems associated with aging: comparisons among four older age cohorts. Gerontologist 31:527–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Francis R, Kanis JA, Marsh D, McCloskey E, Reid DM, Selby P, Wilkins M, National Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and men from the age of 50 years in the UK. Maturitas 62:105–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Cho YJ, Gong HS, Song CH, Lee YH, Baek GH (2014) Evaluation of physical performance level as a fall risk factor in women with a distal radial fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:361–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Crockett K, Kontulainen SA, Farthing JP, Chilibeck PD, Bath B, Baxter-Jones ADG, Arnold CM (2018) Differences in function and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with and without a recent distal radius fracture. J Aging Phys Act 26:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Franchignoni F, Tesio L, Martino MT, Ricupero C (1998) Reliability of four simple, quantitative tests of balance and mobility in healthy elderly females. Aging (Milano) 10:26–31Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ng SS, Hui-Chan CW (2005) The timed up & go test: its reliability and association with lower-limb impairments and locomotor capacities in people with chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1641–1647CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rockwood K, Awalt E, Carver D, MacKnight C (2000) Feasibility and measurement properties of the functional reach and the timed up and go tests in the Canadian study of health and aging. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 55:M70–M73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Wallmann HW (2001) Comparison of elderly nonfallers and fallers on performance measures of functional reach, sensory organization, and limits of stability. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 56:M580–M583CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jonsson E, Henriksson M, Hirschfeld H (2003) Does the functional reach test reflect stability limits in elderly people? J Rehabil Med 35:26–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Aibar-Almazan A, Martinez-Amat A, Cruz-Diaz D, Jimenez-Garcia JD, Achalandabaso A, Sanchez-Montesinos I, de la Torre-Cruz M, Hita-Contreras F (2018) Sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in Spanish community-dwelling middle-aged and older women: association with balance confidence, fear of falling and fall risk. Maturitas 107:26–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dixon WG, Lunt M, Pye SR, Reeve J, Felsenberg D, Silman AJ, O'Neill TW (2005) Low grip strength is associated with bone mineral density and vertebral fracture in women. Rheumatology (Oxford, England) 44:642–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Santanasto AJ, Glynn NW, Lovato LC, Blair SN, Fielding RA, Gill TM, Guralnik JM, Hsu FC, King AC, Strotmeyer ES, Manini TM, Marsh AP, McDermott MM, Goodpaster BH, Pahor M, Newman AB, the LIFE Study Group (2017) Effect of physical activity versus health education on physical function, grip strength and mobility. J Am Geriatr Soc 65:1427–1433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Syddall HE, Westbury LD, Dodds R, Dennison E, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2017) Mortality in the Hertfordshire Ageing Study: association with level and loss of hand grip strength in later life. Age Ageing 46:407–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Syddall HE, Westbury LD, Shaw SC, Dennison EM, Cooper C, Gale CR (2018) Correlates of level and loss of grip strength in later life: findings from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing and the Hertfordshire Cohort Study. Calcif Tissue Int 102(1):53–63Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Roberts HC, Denison HJ, Martin HJ, Patel HP, Syddall H, Cooper C, Sayer AA (2011) A review of the measurement of grip strength in clinical and epidemiological studies: towards a standardised approach. Age Ageing 40:423–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    do Nascimento JA, Silva CC, Dos Santos HH, de Almeida Ferreira JJ, de Andrade PR (2017) A preliminary study of static and dynamic balance in sedentary obese young adults: the relationship between BMI, posture and postural balance. Clin Obes 7:377–383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    MacIntyre NJ, Dewan N (2016) Epidemiology of distal radius fractures and factors predicting risk and prognosis. J Hand Ther 29:136–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Iki M, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Matsuzaki T, Yoneshima H, Marumo F, Grp JS (2001) Bone mineral density of the spine, hip and distal forearm in representative samples of the Japanese female population: Japanese population-based osteoporosis (JPOS) study. Osteoporos Int 12:529–537CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Di Cesare M, Bentham J, Stevens GA et al (2016) Trends in adult body-mass index in 200 countries from 1975 to 2014: a pooled analysis of 1698 population-based measurement studies with 19.2 million participants. Lancet 387:1377–1396CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Orthopaedic and Spinal Surgery, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  2. 2.Department of Functional Joint Anatomy, Graduate School of Medical and Dental SciencesTokyo Medical and Dental UniversityTokyoJapan
  3. 3.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryYokohama City Minato Red Cross HospitalKanagawaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Orthopedic SurgerySuwa Central HospitalNaganoJapan
  5. 5.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryJA Toride Medical CenterIbarakiJapan
  6. 6.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryTokyo Bay Urayasu Ichikawa Medical CenterChibaJapan
  7. 7.JA Kyosai Research InstituteTokyoJapan

Personalised recommendations