Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 29, Issue 5, pp 1023–1047 | Cite as

Identifying characteristics of an effective fracture liaison service: systematic literature review

  • C.-H. Wu
  • C.-H. Chen
  • P.-H. Chen
  • J.-J. Yang
  • P.-C. Chang
  • T.-C. Huang
  • S. Bagga
  • Y. Sharma
  • R.-M. Lin
  • D.-C. ChanEmail author
Review

Abstract

Fracture liaison services (FLS) have been demonstrated to improve outcomes following osteoporotic fracture. The aim of this systematic literature review (SLR) was to determine the characteristics of an FLS that lead to improved patient outcomes. We conducted a SLR, including articles published between 2000 and February 2017, using global (Medline, EMBASE, PubMed and Cochrane Library) and local databases. Studies including patients aged ≥ 50 years with osteoporotic fractures enrolled in an FLS were assessed. Information extracted from each article included key person coordinating the FLS (physician, nurse or other healthcare professional), setting (hospital vs community), intensity (single vs multiple), duration (long vs short term), fracture type and gender. A meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials was conducted based on the key person coordinating the FLS. Out of 7236 articles, 57 were considered to be high quality and identified for further analysis. The SLR identified several components which contributed to FLS success, including multidisciplinary involvement, driven by a dedicated case manager, regular assessment and follow-up, multifaceted interventions and patient education. Meta-analytic data confirm the effectiveness of an FLS following an osteoporotic fracture: approximate 27% increase in the likelihood of BMD testing and up to 21% increase in the likelihood of treatment initiation compared with usual care. The balance of evidence indicates that the multifaceted FLS and dedicated coordination are important success factors that contribute to effective FLS interventions which reduce fracture-related morbidity and mortality.

Keywords

Fracture liaison service Intervention Osteoporosis 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr. Zhongyun Zhao for facilitating this research and author collaborations.

Funding

This work was supported by Amgen Inc. Systematic literature review was conducted by Complete HEOR Solutions LLC and funded by Amgen Inc. Writing and editorial assistance was provided by ApotheCom and funded by Amgen Inc. and Gant from NCKUH (NCKUH-10609007, 10605021).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

Chih-Hsing Wu, Chung-Hwan Chen, Po-Han Chen, Jen-Jia Yang, Po-Chun Chang, Ting-Chun Huang, Yuvraj Sharma, and Ruey-Mo Lin declare that they have no conflict of interest. Shalini Bagga has ownership or partnership in Complete HEOR Solutions LLC. Ding-Cheng Chan receives consulting fees from Amgen, Inc.

Ethical approval

For this type of study, formal consent is not required.

Supplementary material

198_2017_4370_MOESM1_ESM.doc (156 kb)
ESM 1 (DOC 155 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Foundation IO (2017) Facts and statistics https://www.iofbonehealth.org/facts-statistics. International Osteoporosis Foundation
  2. 2.
    Akesson K, Marsh D, Mitchell PJ, McLellan AR, Stenmark J, Pierroz DD et al (2013) Capture the fracture: a best practice framework and global campaign to break the fragility fracture cycle. Osteoporos Int 24(8):2135–2152.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2348-z CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ensrud K (2013) Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age. J Gerontol 68(10):1236–1242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P, Eisman J, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, Kroger H, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35(2):375–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2004.03.024 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Strom O, Borgström F, Kanis JA, Compstom J, Cooper C, McCloskey EV, Jonsson B (2011) Osteoporosis: burden, health care provision and opportunities in the EU: a report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 1–98Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0172-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ensrud KE (2013) Epidemiology of fracture risk with advancing age. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 68(10):1236–1242.  https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/glt092 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Briot K (2017) Fracture liaison services. Curr Opin Rheumatol 29(4):416–421.  https://doi.org/10.1097/BOR.0000000000000401 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Compston J (2016) Osteoporosis: advances in risk assessment and management. Clin Med (London) 16(6):s121–s124.  https://doi.org/10.7861/clinmedicine.16-6-s121 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kung AWFT, Xu L, Xia WB, Park IH, Sun K, Chan SW, Lee JK, Koh L, Soog YK, Soontrapa S, Songpatanaslip T, Turajane T, Yates M, Sen S (2013) Factors influencing diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture among postmenopausal women in Asian countries: a retrospective study. BMC Women’s Health 13(7):1–7Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kammerlander C, Gosch M, Kammerlander-Knauer U, Luger TJ, Blauth M, Roth T (2011) Long-term functional outcome in geriatric hip fracture patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 131(10):1435–1444.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-011-1313-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA, March L, Seibel MJ (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(2):393–406.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2090-y CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    International Osteoporosis Foundation. Best practice framework for fracture liaison services. http://capturethefracture.org/sites/default/files/2014-IOF-CTF-best_practice_framework.pdf2014
  14. 14.
    Wu CH, Tu ST, Chang YF, Chan DC, Chien JT, Lin CH, Singh S, Dasari M, Chen JF, Tsai KS (2017) Fracture liaison services improve outcomes of patients with osteoporosis-related fractures: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 3(3):S51–S52.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2017.08.096 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cochrane’s risk of bias tool. Cochrane Collaboration modified tool for assessing risk of bias for RCTs, PART I. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK132434/bin/appd-fm3.pdf
  16. 16.
    The Ottawa University (2014) Newcastle-Ottawa quality assessment scale case control studies. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/nosgen.pdf.
  17. 17.
    Wells GA, Shea B, O'Connell D, Peterson J, Welch V, Losos M, Tugwell P (2014) The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for assessing the quality of nonrandomised studies in meta-analyses. http://www.ohri.ca/programs/clinical_epidemiology/oxford.asp.
  18. 18.
    Abou-Raya SA-RA, Khadrawi T (2013) AB0627 a randomized controlled trial of early initiation of osteoporosis assessment and management in the acute setting of the fracture clinic. Ann Rheum Dis 72:A981CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Bessette L, Davison KS, Jean S, Roy S, Ste-Marie LG, Brown JP (2011) The impact of two educational interventions on osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment after fragility fracture: a population-based randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 22(12):2963–2972.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1533-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(9):1309–1317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0078-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cranney A, Lam M, Ruhland L, Brison R, Godwin M, Harrison MM, Harrison MB, Anastassiades T, Grimshaw JM, Graham ID (2008) A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int 19(12):1733–1740.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0669-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Davis J, Guy P, Ashe M, Liu-Ambrose T, Khan K (2007) HipWatch: osteoporosis investigation and treatment after a hip fracture: a 6-month randomized controlled trial. J Gerontol Med Sci 62a(8):888–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C, Aickin M, Swain MC (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(3):450–457.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00618.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Ganda K, Schaffer A, Pearson S, Seibel MJ (2014) Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management. Osteoporos Int 25(4):1345–1355.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-013-2610-4 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gardner MJ, Brophy R, Demetrakopoulos D, Koob J, Hong R, Rana A et al (2005) Interventions to improve osteoporosis treatment following hip fracture: a prospective, randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg 87a(1):3–7CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Jaglal SB, Donescu OS, Bansod V, Laprade J, Thorpe K, Hawker G, Majumdar SR, Meadows L, Cadarette SM, Papaioannou A, Kloseck M, Beaton D, Bogoch E, Zwarenstein M (2012) Impact of a centralized osteoporosis coordinator on post-fracture osteoporosis management: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int 23(1):87–95.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-011-1726-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leslie WD, Labine L, Klassen P, Dreilich D, Caetano P (2012) Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial. Can Med Assoc J 184(3):290–296.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111158 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Lier DA, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Blitz S, Steiner IP, Maksymowych WP, Morrish DW, Holroyd BR, Rowe BH (2007) Persistence, reproducibility, and cost-effectiveness of an intervention to improve the quality of osteoporosis care after a fracture of the wrist: results of a controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18(3):261–270.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-006-0248-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Morrish DW, Maksymowych WP, Rowe BH (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178(5):569–575.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.070981 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Majumdar SR, Lier DA, Rowe BH, Russell AS, McAlister FA, Maksymowych WP, Hanley DA, Morrish DW, Johnson JA (2011) Cost-effectiveness of a multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1799–1808.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1412-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Merle BCR, Vignot E, Thomas T, Haesebaert J, Schott A-M (2017) Post-fracture care: do we need to educate patients rather than doctors? The PREVOST randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 28(1549).  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-017-3953-z
  32. 32.
    Miki RA, Oetgen ME, Kirk J, Insogna KL, Lindskog DM (2008) Orthopaedic management improves the rate of early osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(11):2346–2353.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01246 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Morrish DW, Beaupre LA, Bell NR, Cinats JG, Hanley DA, Harley CH, Juby AG, Lier DA, Maksymowych WP, Majumdar SR (2009) Facilitated bone mineral density testing versus hospital-based case management to improve osteoporosis treatment for hip fracture patients: additional results from a randomized trial. Arthritis Rheum 61(2):209–215.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.24097 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Queally JM, Kiernan C, Shaikh M, Rowan F, Bennett D (2013) Initiation of osteoporosis assessment in the fracture clinic results in improved osteoporosis management: a randomised controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 24(3):1089–1094.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-012-2238-9 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roux S, Beaulieu M, Beaulieu MC, Cabana F, Boire G (2013) Priming primary care physicians to treat osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: an integrated multidisciplinary approach. J Rheumatol 40(5):703–711.  https://doi.org/10.3899/jrheum.120908 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Rozental TD, Makhni EC, Day CS, Bouxsein ML (2008) Improving evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis following distal radial fractures. A prospective randomized intervention. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(5):953–961.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.01121 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Vidan M, Serra JA, Moreno C, Riquelme G, Ortiz J (2005) Efficacy of a comprehensive geriatric intervention in older patients hospitalized for hip fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 53(9):1476–1482.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.53466.x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Yuksel N, Majumdar SR, Biggs C, Tsuyuki RT (2010) Community pharmacist-initiated screening program for osteoporosis: randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 21(3):391–398.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-009-0977-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Bellerose D, McAlister FA, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Garg S, Lier DA, Maksymowych WP, Morrish DW, Rowe BH (2011) Nurse case-manager vs multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture: randomized controlled pilot study. Osteoporos Int 22(1):223–230.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1212-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Amphansap T, Stitkitti N, Dumrongwanich P (2016) Evaluation of police general hospital’s fracture liaison service (PGH’s FLS): the first study of a fracture liaison service in Thailand. Osteoporos Sarcopenia 2(4):238–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afos.2016.09.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Astrand J, Nilsson J, Thorngren KG (2012) Screening for osteoporosis reduced new fracture incidence by almost half: a 6-year follow-up of 592 fracture patients from an osteoporosis screening program. Acta Orthop 83(6):661–665.  https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2012.747922 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Axelsson KF, Jacobsson R, Lund D, Lorentzon M (2016) Effectiveness of a minimal resource fracture liaison service. Osteoporos Int 27(11):3165–3175.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3643-2 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R, Lanarkshire OS (2005) Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin 21(4):475–482.  https://doi.org/10.1185/030079905X38150 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Cosman F, Nicpon K, Nieves JW (2017) Results of a fracture liaison service on hip fracture patients in an open healthcare system. Aging Clin Exp Res 29(2):331–334.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s40520-016-0545-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cuddihy MT, Amadio PC, Gabriel SE, Pankratz VS, Kurland RL, Melton LJ 3rd. (2004) A prospective clinical practice intervention to improve osteoporosis management following distal forearm fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(9):695–700.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1597-2 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Haaland DA, Cohen DR, Kennedy CC, Khalidi NA, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A (2009) Closing the osteoporosis care gap: increased osteoporosis awareness among geriatrics and rehabilitation teams. BMC Geriatr 9(1):28.  https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-9-28 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal S, Bogoch E (2003) The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 14(2):171–178CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Johnson SL, Petkov VI, Williams MI, Via PS, Adler RA (2005) Improving osteoporosis management in patients with fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(9):1079–1085.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-004-1814-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Jaglal SB, Hawker G, Bansod V, Salbach NM, Zwarenstein M, Carroll J, Brooks D, Cameron C, Bogoch E, Jaakkimainen L, Kreder H (2009) A demonstration project of a multi-component educational intervention to improve integrated post-fracture osteoporosis care in five rural communities in Ontario, Canada. Osteoporos Int 20(2):265–274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0654-7 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, Johnson JA, Holroyd BR, Morrish DW et al (2004) A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 141:366–373.  https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-141-5-200409070-00011 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Murray AW, McQuillan C, Kennon B, Gallacher SJ (2005) Osteoporosis risk assessment and treatment intervention after hip or shoulder fracture. A comparison of two centres in the United Kingdom. Injury 36(9):1080–1084.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.injury.2005.03.012 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Roy A, Heckman MG, O'Connor MI (2011) Optimizing screening for osteoporosis in patients with fragility hip fracture. Clin Orthop Relat Res 469(7):1925–1930.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-011-1839-5 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Ruggiero C, Zampi E, Rinonapoli G, Baroni M, Serra R, Zengarini E, Baglioni G, Duranti G, Ercolani S, Conti F, Caraffa A, Mecocci P, Brandi ML (2015) Fracture prevention service to bridge the osteoporosis care gap. Clin Interv Aging 10:1035–1042.  https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S76695 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    van Geel TA, Bliuc D, Geusens P, Center J, Dinant GJ, Eisman J, Van den Bergh J, McLellan A (2013) Subsequent fracture risk and mortality in the Glasgow fracture liaison service: an 8-year follow-up study. J Bone Min Res 28Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Harrington JT, Barash HL, Day S, Lease J (2005) Redesigning the care of fragility fracture patients to improve osteoporosis management: a health care improvement project. Arthritis Rheum 53(2):198–204.  https://doi.org/10.1002/art.21072 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Hofflich HL, Oh DK, Choe CH, Clay B, Tibble C, Kulasa KM, Shah PK, Fink E, Girard PJ, Schwartz AK, Maynard GA (2014) Using a triggered endocrinology service consultation to improve the evaluation, management, and follow-up of osteoporosis in hip-fracture patients. Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf 40(5):228–AP1.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1553-7250(14)40030-8 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sarfani S, Scrabeck T, Kearns AE, Berger RA, Kakar S (2014) Clinical efficacy of a fragility care program in distal radius fracture patients. J Hand Surg Am 39(4):664–669.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.01.009 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    van Helden S (2008) Looking beyond the fracture: prevention in fracture care: Doctoral Thesis—Maastricht: Maastricht UniversityGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Tosi LL, Gliklich R, Kannan K, Koval KJ (2008) The American Orthopaedic Association’s “own the bone” initiative to prevent secondary fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(1):163–173.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.G.00682 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Wallace I, Callachand F, Elliott J, Gardiner P (2011) An evaluation of an enhanced fracture liaison service as the optimal model for secondary prevention of osteoporosis. JRSM Short Rep 2(2):8CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Van der Kallen J, Giles M, Cooper K, Gill K, Parker V, Tembo A, Major G, Ross L, Carter J (2014) A fracture prevention service reduces further fractures two years after incident minimal trauma fracture. Int J Rheum Dis 17(2):195–203.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1756-185X.12101 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Beaton DE, Vidmar M, Pitzul KB, Sujic R, Rotondi NK, Bogoch ER, Sale JEM, Jain R, Weldon J (2017) Addition of a fracture risk assessment to a coordinator’s role improved treatment rates within 6 months of screening in a fragility fracture screening program. Osteoporos Int 28(3):863–869.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-016-3794-1 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Kamel H, Hussain M, Tariq S, Perry H III, Morley J (2000) Failure to diagnose and treat osteoporosis in elderly patients hospitalized with hip fracture. Am J Med 109(4):326–328.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0002-9343(00)00457-5 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Heilmann RM, Friesleben CR, Billups SJ (2012) Impact of a pharmacist-directed intervention in postmenopausal women after fracture. Am J Health Syst Pharm 69(6):504–509.  https://doi.org/10.2146/ajhp110309 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Huntjens KMB, van Geel TCM, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Willems P, van den Bergh J, Brink PRG, van Helden S (2011) Impact of guideline implementation by a fracture nurse on subsequent fractures and mortality in patients presenting with non-vertebral fractures. Injury 42:S39–S43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0020-1383(11)70011-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Huntjens KM, van Geel TA, van den Bergh JP, van Helden S, Willems P, Winkens B et al (2014) Fracture liaison service: impact on subsequent nonvertebral fracture incidence and mortality. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96(4):e29.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.L.00223 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Laslett LL, Whitham JN, Gibb C, Gill TK, Pink JA, McNeil JD (2007) Improving diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis: evaluation of a clinical pathway for low trauma fractures. Arch Osteoporos 2(1–2):1–6.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-007-0010-0 CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Streetan E, Mohamed A, Gandhi A, Orwig D, Sack P, Sterling R et al (2006) The inpatient consultation approach to osteoporosis treatment in patients with a fracture. J Bone Joint Surg 88a(9):1968–1974Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Hawley S, Javaid MK, Prieto-Alhambra D, Lippett J, Sheard S, Arden NK, Cooper C, Judge A, REFReSH study group (2016) Clinical effectiveness of orthogeriatric and fracture liaison service models of care for hip fracture patients: population-based longitudinal study. Age Ageing 45(2):236–242.  https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afv204 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Lih A, Nandapalan H, Kim M, Yap C, Lee P, Ganda K, Seibel MJ (2011) Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 22(3):849–858.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-010-1477-x CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Nakayama A, Major G, Holliday E, Attia J, Bogduk N (2016) Evidence of effectiveness of a fracture liaison service to reduce the re-fracture rate. Osteoporos Int 27(3):873–879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-015-3443-0 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Henderson CY, Shanahan E, Butler A, Lenehan B, O’Connor M, Lyons D et al (2017) Dedicated orthogeriatric service reduces hip fracture mortality. Ir J Med Sci 186(1):179–184.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11845-016-1453-3 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Peng LN, Chen WM, Chen CF, Huang CK, Lee WJ, Chen LK (2016) Survival benefits of post-acute care for older patients with hip fractures in Taiwan: a 5-year prospective cohort study. Geriatr Gerontol Int 16(1):28–36.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ggi.12429 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Compston J, Cooper A, Cooper C, Gittoes N, Gregson C, Harvey N, Hope S, Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Poole KES, Reid DM, Selby P, Thompson F, Thurston A, Vine N, Osteoporosis Guideline Group (NOGG) (2017) UK clinical guideline for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. Arch Osteoporos 12:43.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11657-017-0324-5
  75. 75.
    Majumdar SR (2012) Quality-improvement interventions for osteoporosis: when are the results worth the effort? CMAJ 184(3):279–280.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.111999 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Chen JS, Hogan C, Lyubomirsky G, Sambrook PN (2009) Management of osteoporosis in primary care in Australia. Osteoporos Int 20(3):491–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00198-008-0686-z CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Fraser S, Wong PK (2017) Secondary fracture prevention needs to happen in the country too: the first two and a half years of the Coffs Fracture Prevention Clinic. Aust J Rural Health 25(1):28–33.  https://doi.org/10.1111/ajr.12291 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Blain HMT, Dargent-Moline P, Martin FC, Rosendahl E, Van Der Velde N, Bousquet J, Benetos A, Cooper C, Kanis JA, Reginster JY (2016) A comprehensive fracture prevention strategy in older adults: The European Union Geriatric Medicine Society (EUGMS) statement. J Nutr Health Aging 20(6):647–652.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-016-0741-y CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society (ANZBMS). Australian and New Zealand Bone and Mineral Society position paper on secondary fracture prevention programs: a call to action. https://www.anzbms.org.au/downloads/ANZBMSPosition PaperonSecondaryFracturePreventionApril2015.pdf2015
  80. 80.
    Papaioannou A, Morin S, Cheung AM, Atkinson S, Brown JP, Feldman S, Hanley DA, Hodsman A, Jamal SA, Kaiser SM, Kvern B, Siminoski K, Leslie WD, for the Scientific Advisory Council of Osteoporosis Canada (2010) 2010 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada: summary. Can Med Assoc J 182(7):1864–1873.  https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.100771 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Miller AN, Lake AF, Emory CL (2015) Establishing a fracture liaison service: an orthopaedic approach. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(8):675–681.  https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.N.00957 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • C.-H. Wu
    • 1
    • 2
  • C.-H. Chen
    • 3
    • 4
    • 5
    • 6
  • P.-H. Chen
    • 7
  • J.-J. Yang
    • 8
  • P.-C. Chang
    • 9
  • T.-C. Huang
    • 10
  • S. Bagga
    • 11
  • Y. Sharma
    • 11
  • R.-M. Lin
    • 12
  • D.-C. Chan
    • 10
    • 13
    • 14
    Email author
  1. 1.Department of Family MedicineNational Cheng Kung University College of Medicine and HospitalTainanTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of GerontologyNational Cheng Kung University College of MedicineTainanTaiwan
  3. 3.Orthopaedic Research CenterKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  4. 4.Department of Orthopaedics, College of MedicineKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  5. 5.Division of Adult Reconstruction Surgery, Department of OrthopedicsKaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  6. 6.Department of Orthopedics, Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung HospitalKaohsiung Medical UniversityKaohsiungTaiwan
  7. 7.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryChang Gung Memorial HospitalYunlinTaiwan
  8. 8.Department of Internal MedicinePo Jen General HospitalTaipei CityTaiwan
  9. 9.Department of Orthopedics, An Nan HospitalChina Medical UniversityTainanTaiwan
  10. 10.National Taiwan University Hospital Chu-Tung BranchHsinchuTaiwan
  11. 11.Complete HEOR Solutions LLCNorth WalesUSA
  12. 12.Tainan Municipal An-Nan Hospital-China Medical UniversityTainanTaiwan
  13. 13.Department of Geriatrics and GerontologyNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan
  14. 14.Department of Internal MedicineNational Taiwan University HospitalTaipeiTaiwan

Personalised recommendations