Osteoporosis International

, Volume 28, Issue 10, pp 2913–2919 | Cite as

Barriers to secondary fracture prevention in primary care

  • A. S. Mendis
  • K. Ganda
  • M. J. SeibelEmail author
Original Article



This study of current osteoporosis management patterns in general practice found that the majority of patients presenting to their local health practitioner with a recent low-trauma fracture was not managed appropriately. The analysis demonstrated that failure to investigate was highly predictive of failure to treat and that one of the major barriers to effective osteoporosis management is a lack of specific knowledge about who to investigate and treat.


Osteoporotic fractures are associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The current study aimed (i) to determine the number of patients with osteoporotic fractures who were not investigated or treated for osteoporosis by their primary care physician and (ii) to identify factors that contribute to the ongoing gap in osteoporosis care.


We conducted an observational retrospective study (2012–2014) using explicit medical record review at three major general practices in metropolitan Sydney. Patients aged 55 years or older who had a documented minimal trauma fracture (MTF) were identified. Data collected included demographics, prior fractures, testing for vitamin D/bone mineral density and initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. The main outcome measures included the number of patients who did not undergo the following: (i) a bone density scan, (ii) vitamin D measurement and/or (iii) initiation of osteoporosis pharmacotherapy.


Of the 87 patients (69% female; mean age 71.7 years) with prevalent MTF, 55 (63%) were not referred for a bone density scan. Vitamin D levels were not measured in 36 patients (41%) and 55 patients (63%) did not receive specific osteoporosis pharmacotherapy. Failure to investigate was highly predictive of failure to treat (p < 0.001). The presence of major osteoporotic risk factors did not affect the likelihood of investigation or treatment, indicating that a major barrier to effective osteoporosis management was a lack of knowledge.


Management of patients with MTF’s in primary care is poor. Systems aimed at improving the identification and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures in this setting is required in order to close the osteoporosis care gap.


Bone density Investigation Management Osteoporosis Primary care 


Compliance with ethical standards

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Watts J, Abimanyi-Ochom J, Sanders K (2013) Osteoporosis costing all Australians a new burden of disease analysis—2012 to 2022. Osteoporosis Australia, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35(2):375–382CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahmed LA, Center JR, Bjørnerem Å et al (2013) Progressively increasing fracture risk with advancing age after initial incident fragility fracture: the Tromsø Study. J Bone Miner Res 28(10):2214–2221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bliuc D, Alarkawi D, Nguyen TV et al (2015) Risk of subsequent fractures and mortality in elderly women and men with fragility fractures with and without osteoporotic bone density: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. J Bone Miner Res 30(4):637–646CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Center JR, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV et al (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. JAMA 297(4):387–394CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Edwards BJ, Bunta AD, Simonelli C et al (2007) Prior fractures are common in patients with subsequent hip fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 461:226–230PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gallagher JC, Melton LJ, Riggs BL et al (1980) Epidemiology of fractures of the proximal femur in Rochester, Minnesota. Clin Orthop Relat Res 150:163–171Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    McLellan A, Reid D, Forbes K et al (2004) Effectiveness of strategies for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Scotland (CEPS: 99/03). Scotland, NHS Quality ImprovementGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Port L, Center J, Briffa NK et al (2003) Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention. Osteoporos Int 14(9):780–784CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Nguyen TV, Center JR, Eisman JA (2004) Osteoporosis: underrated, underdiagnosed and undertreated. Med J Aust 180(5 Suppl):S18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Eisman J, Clapham S, Kehoe L et al (2004) Osteoporosis prevalence and levels of treatment in primary care: the Australian BoneCare Study. J Bone Miner Res 19(12):1969–1975CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chen JS, Hogan C, Lyubomirsky G et al (2009) Management of osteoporosis in primary care in Australia. Osteoporos Int 20(3):491–496CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lih A, Nandapalan H, Kim M et al (2011) Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 22(3):849–858CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS et al (2013) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 24(2):393–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management in postmenopausal women and men over 50 years of age. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners and Osteoporosis Australia. 2nd Edition Published 2017. (accessed May 2017)
  16. 16.
    Taylor JC, Sterkel B, Utley M et al (2001) Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. Osteoporos Int 12:844–848CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jaglal SB, Carroll J, Hawker G et al (2003) How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs. Can Fam Physician 49(4):462–468PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pharmaceuticals Benefit Scheme: Australian Government Department of Health (2016). (accessed August 2016)
  19. 19.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(12):1726–1733CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Aea O (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR et al (2007) Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 22:781–788CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A et al (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35(5):293–305CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Leslie WD, Giangregorio LM, Yogendran M et al (2012) A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996-2008: the situation is not improving. Osteoporos Int 23(5):1623–1629CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Falls and fractures: effective interventions in health and social care. Department of Health in England. Published July 2009. (accessed May 2017)
  25. 25.
    Pérez-Edo L, Ciria Recasens M, Castelo-Branco C et al (2004) Management of osteoporosis in general practice: a cross-sectional survey of primary care practitioners in Spain. Osteoporos Int 15(3):252–257CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Brankin E, Mitchell C, Munro R et al (2005) Closing the osteoporosis management gap in primary care: a secondary prevention of fracture programme. Curr Med Res Opin 21(4):475–482CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Level 6 Concord Medical CentreConcord Repatriation General HospitalConcord WestAustralia

Personalised recommendations