Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 28, Issue 4, pp 1393–1399 | Cite as

Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis: a case-control study

  • P. HadjiEmail author
  • J. Boekhoff
  • M. Hahn
  • L. Hellmeyer
  • O. Hars
  • I. Kyvernitakis
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The etiology and underlying mechanisms of pregnancy-associated osteoporosis (PAO) are still unknown, since no systematic analyses exist. Our results indicate that PAO is a heterogeneous, rare but severe disease including a substantial number of fractures with a significant delay from first symptom to diagnose.

Introduction

Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis (PAO) is a rare but severe type of premenopausal osteoporosis. Most common symptom includes acute lower back pain due to vertebral fracture predominantly occurring in the last trimester of pregnancy or immediately postpartum. The exact underlining mechanisms and risk factors of PAO are still unknown, and up to date, there are no published systematic analyses.

Methods

We identified 102 PAO patients and matched them with 102 healthy controls according to age, region, and gravidity to evaluate risk factors in a large and homogenous population of women.

Results

The baseline characteristics and anthropometric data of the two study groups were similar. Eighty-eight percent of the patients with PAO suffered from one or more fractures with a mean of 3.3 fractures per patient. The most common fracture site was the thoracolumbar spine, whereas 29, 37, 48, and 35% of the patients reported fractures at TH11, TH12, L1, and L2, respectively. PAO patients suffered more frequently from excessive dental problems in childhood (p < 0.001). The control group performed significantly more frequently sports both before (p < 0.002) and after puberty (p < 0.01). Compared to the controls, the patients with PAO reported twice as often severe diseases during pregnancy (p < 0.029). Hereby, the frequency of immobilization was twice as often in the PAO group compared to that in the control group (p < 0.005).

Conclusions

Our results indicate that PAO is a heterogeneous, rare but severe disease including a substantial number of fractures with a significant delay from first symptom to diagnose. Increased awareness is warranted to immediately start effective treatment.

Keywords

Pregancy associated osteoporosis Fracture risk Risk factors 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

The local ethics committee of the Philipps-University of Marburg approved the study. All patients provided written informed consent prior to participation according to the declaration of Helsinki and the German law.

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Kovacs CS (2014) Osteoporosis presenting in pregnancy, puerperium, and lactation. Curr Opin Endocrinol Diabetes Obes 21(6):468–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stride PJ, Patel N, Kingston D (2013) The history of osteoporosis: why do Egyptian mummies have porotic bones? J R Coll Physicians Edinb 43(3):254–261CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ferrari S, Bianchi ML, Eisman JA, Foldes AJ, Adami S, Wahl DA et al (2012) Osteoporosis in young adults: pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management. Osteoporos Int 23(12):2735–2748CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winarno AS, Kyvernitakis I, Hadji P (2014) Successful treatment of 1-34 parathyroid hormone (PTH) after failure of bisphosphonate therapy in a complex case of pregnancy associated osteoporosis and multiple fractures. Z Geburtshilfe Neonatol 218(4):171–173CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Smith R, Stevenson JC, Winearls CG, Woods CG, Wordsworth BP (1985) Osteoporosis of pregnancy. Lancet 1(8439):1178–1180CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kovacs CS, Ralston SH (2015) Presentation and management of osteoporosis presenting in association with pregnancy or lactation. Osteoporos Int 26(9):2223–2241CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Campos-Obando N, Oei L, Hoefsloot LH, Kiewiet RM, Klaver CC, Simon ME et al (2014) Osteoporotic vertebral fractures during pregnancy: be aware of a potential underlying genetic cause. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 99(4):1107–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Khastgir G, Studd JW, King H, Abdalla H, Jones J, Carter G et al (1996) Changes in bone density and biochemical markers of bone turnover in pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 103(7):716–718CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kovacs CS (2001) Calcium and bone metabolism in pregnancy and lactation. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 86(6):2344–2348PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kovacs CS (2012) The role of vitamin D in pregnancy and lactation: insights from animal models and clinical studies. Annu Rev Nutr 32:97–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hellmeyer L, Hahn B, Fischer C, Hars O, Boekhoff J, Maier J et al (2015) Quantitative ultrasonometry during pregnancy and lactation: a longitudinal study. Osteoporos Int 26(3):1147–1154CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hellmeyer L, Boekhoff J, Hadji P (2010) Treatment with teriparatide in a patient with pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. Gynecol Endocrinol 26(10):725–728CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nakamura Y, Kamimura M, Ikegami S, Mukaiyama K, Komatsu M, Uchiyama S et al (2015) A case series of pregnancy- and lactation-associated osteoporosis and a review of the literature. Ther Clin Risk Manag 11:1361–1365CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Alexandre C, Vico L (2011) Pathophysiology of bone loss in disuse osteoporosis. Joint Bone Spine 78(6):572–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Nikander R, Sievanen H, Heinonen A, Daly RM, Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P (2010) Targeted exercise against osteoporosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis for optimising bone strength throughout life. BMC Med 8:47CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dahlman TC (1993) Osteoporotic fractures and the recurrence of thromboembolism during pregnancy and the puerperium in 184 women undergoing thromboprophylaxis with heparin. Am J Obstet Gynecol 168(4):1265–1270CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Pfeilschifter J (2015) Diagnosing osteoporosis: what is new in the 2014 DVO guideline? Dtsch Med Wochenschr 140(22):1667–1671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Drozdzowska B, Pluskiewicz W, Michno M (2006) Tooth count in elderly women in relation to their skeletal status. Maturitas 55(2):126–131CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ondrak KS, Morgan DW (2007) Physical activity, calcium intake and bone health in children and adolescents. Sports Med 37(7):587–600CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tsvetov G, Levy S, Benbassat C, Shraga-Slutzky I, Hirsch D (2014) Influence of number of deliveries and total breast-feeding time on bone mineral density in premenopausal and young postmenopausal women. Maturitas 77(3):249–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Khovidhunkit W, Epstein S (1996) Osteoporosis in pregnancy. Osteoporos Int 6(5):345–354CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Smith R, Athanasou NA, Ostlere SJ, Vipond SE (1995) Pregnancy-associated osteoporosis. QJM 88(12):865–878PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Di Gregorio S, Danilowicz K, Rubin Z, Mautalen C (2000) Osteoporosis with vertebral fractures associated with pregnancy and lactation. Nutrition 16(11–12):1052–1055CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Peris P, Guanabens N, Monegal A, Pons F, Martinez de Osaba MJ, Ros I et al (2002) Pregnancy associated osteoporosis: the familial effect. Clin Exp Rheumatol 20(5):697–700PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Hadji
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • J. Boekhoff
    • 3
  • M. Hahn
    • 3
  • L. Hellmeyer
    • 4
  • O. Hars
    • 5
  • I. Kyvernitakis
    • 2
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Bone Oncology, Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, German Reference Centre for Pregnancy-Associated OsteoporosisNordwest Hospital of the Goethe-University of FrankfurtFrankfurt a. MGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicinePhilipps-University of MarburgMarburgGermany
  3. 3.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyPhilipps-University of MarburgMarburgGermany
  4. 4.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyVivantes Klinikum FriedrichshainBerlinGermany
  5. 5.Statistical Institute Dr. HarsBerlinGermany
  6. 6.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologyBuergerhospital of the Goethe-University of FrankfurtFrankfurtGermany

Personalised recommendations