Whole-body electromyostimulation to fight sarcopenic obesity in community-dwelling older women at risk. Resultsof the randomized controlled FORMOsA-sarcopenic obesity study
- 424 Downloads
The effect of whole body-electromyostimulation in community-dwelling women ≥70 with sarcopenic obesity was heterogeneous, with high effects on muscle mass, moderate effects on functional parameters, and minor effects on fat mass. Further, we failed to determine a supportive effect of additional protein-enriched dietary supplementation in this albeit predominately well-nourished group.
The aim of the study was to determine the effect of whole-body electromyostimulation (WB-EMS) on sarcopenic obesity (SO) in community-dwelling women more than 70 years with sarcopenic obesity.
Seventy-five community-dwelling women ≥70 years with SO were randomly allocated to either a WB-EMS-application with (WB-EMS &P; 24.9 ± 1.9 kg/m2) or without (WB-EMS; 25.2 ± 1.8 kg/m2) dietary supplementation (150 kcal/day, 56 % protein) or a non-training control group (CG; 24.7 ± 1.4 kg/m2). WB-EMS consisted of one weekly session of 20 min (85 Hz, 350 μs, 4 s of strain–4 s of rest) performed with moderate to high intensity. Primary study endpoint was the Sarcopenia Z-Score constituted by skeletal muscle mass index (SMI, as assessed by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry), grip strength, and gait speed, and secondary study endpoint was body fat (%).
Sarcopenia Z-score comparably increases in the WB-EMS and the WB-EMS&P-group (p ≤ .046). Both groups differ significantly (p ≤ .001) from the CG which deteriorated significantly (p = .006). Although body fat changes were most pronounced in the WB-EMS (−0.9 ± 2.1; p = .125) and WB-EMS&P (−1.4 ± 2.5; p = .028), reductions did not statistically differ (p = .746) from the CG (−0.8 ± 2.7; p = .179). Looking behind the covariates, the most prominent changes were determined for SMI, with a significant increase in both EMS-groups (2.0–2.5 %; p ≤ .003) and a decrease in the CG (−1.2 ± 3.1 %; p = .050) with significant between-group differences (p = .001).
WB-EMS is a safe and attractive method for increasing muscle mass and functional capacity in this cohort of women 70+ with SO; however, the effect on body fat is minor. Protein-enriched supplements did not increase effects of WB-EMS alone.
KeywordsBody fat Community-dwelling older people Sarcopenic obesity Skeletal muscle mass Whole-body electromyostimulation
We like to thank the “Bayerische Forschungsstiftung” (Munich, Germany) that supported the FORMOsA-Project. We further acknowledge the support of miha-bodytec (Gersthofen, Germany), Nutricia (Erlangen, Germany), and physiomed (Leipersdorf, Germany).
Trial registration number
NCT02356016 on www.clinicaltrials.gov
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
- 3.Zoico E, Di Francesco V, Guralnik JM, Mazzali G, Bortolani A, Guariento S, Sergi G, Bosello O, Zamboni M (2004) Physical disability and muscular strength in relation to obesity and different body composition indexes in a sample of healthy elderly women. Int J Obes Relat Metab Disord 28:234–241PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 8.Batsis JA, Barre LK, Mackenzie TA, Pratt SI, Lopez-Jimenez F, Bartels SJ (2013) Variation in the prevalence of sarcopenia and sarcopenic obesity in older adults associated with different research definitions: dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004. J Am Geriatr Soc 61:974–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 9.Börjesson M, Hellenius ML, Jansson E, Karlson J, Leijon M, Staehle A, Sundberg CJ, Taube T (2010) Physical activity in the prevention and treatment of disease. Swedish Institute of Health, StockholmGoogle Scholar
- 12.Statistisches-Bundesamt (2006) Gesundheit in Deutschland [Health in Germany]. Gesundheitsberichterstattung des BundesBerlinGoogle Scholar
- 15.AHHS (2008) Physical activity guidelines for Americans. Oklahoma Nurse 53:25Google Scholar
- 17.Kemmler W, Birlauf A, von Stengel S (2010) Einfluss von Ganzkörper-Elektromyostimulation auf das Metabolische Syndrom bei älteren Männern mit metabolischem Syndrom. Dtsch Z Sportmed 61:117–123Google Scholar
- 21.WHO (1995) Physical status: the use and interpretation of anthropometry. Report of a WHO expert committee. In: Organization. WH (ed) World Health Organ Tech Rep SerGeneva, pp p. 1-452Google Scholar
- 25.Johnson JL, Slentz CA, Houmard JA, Samsa GP, Duscha BD, Aiken LB, McCartney JS, Tanner CJ, Kraus WE (2007) Exercise training amount and intensity effects on metabolic syndrome (from Studies of a Targeted Risk Reduction Intervention through Defined Exercise). Am J Cardiol 100:1759–1766CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 26.Kemmler W, Riedel H (1998) Körperliche Belastung und Osteoporose—Einfluß einer 10monatigen Interventionsmaßnahme auf ossäre und extraossäre Risikofaktoren einer Osteoporose. Dtsch Z Sportmed 49:270–277Google Scholar
- 30.Honaker J, King G, Blackwell M (2011) Amelia II: a program for missing data JSS 45:1-47Google Scholar
- 32.Holm S (1979) A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand J Stat 6:65–70Google Scholar
- 34.Kemmler W, Teschler M, Goisser S, Bebenek M, von Stengel S, Bollheimer LC, Sieber CC, Freiberger E (2015) Prevalence of sarcopenia in Germany and the corresponding effect of osteoarthritis in females 70 years and older living in the community: results of the FORMoSA study. Clin Interv Aging 10:1565–1573CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- 36.D-A-CH (2013) (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Ernährung): D-A-CH Referenzwerte. Referenzwerte der Nährstoffzufuhr. D-A-CH 1. Auflage, 5. korrigierter NachdruckGoogle Scholar
- 37.WHO (2007) Protein and amino acid requirements in human nutrition: report of a joint WHO/FAO/UNU expert consultation. GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 41.Tipton KD (2008) Protein for adaptation to exercise training. EJSS 8:107–118Google Scholar
- 44.Liu CJ, Latham NK (2009) Progressive resistance strength training for improving physical function in older adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD002759Google Scholar