Osteoporosis International

, Volume 27, Issue 7, pp 2217–2222 | Cite as

Continued decline in hip fracture incidence in Norway: a NOREPOS study

  • A. J. Søgaard
  • K. Holvik
  • H. E. Meyer
  • G. S. Tell
  • C. G. Gjesdal
  • N. Emaus
  • G. Grimnes
  • B. Schei
  • S. Forsmo
  • T. K. Omsland
Short Communication

Abstract

Summary

The previously reported decline in age-adjusted hip fracture rates in Norway during 1999–2008 continued after 2008. The annual number of hip fractures decreased in women and increased in men.

Introduction

Norway has among the highest hip fracture incidence rates ever reported despite previously observed declining rates from 1999 through 2008. The aim of the present study was to investigate whether this downward trend continued through 2013, and to compare gender-specific trends in 5 year age-groups during three time periods: 1999–2003, 2004–2008, and 2009–2013.

Methods

All hip fractures (cervical, trochanteric, and sub-trochanteric) admitted to Norwegian hospitals were retrieved. Annual age-standardized incidence rates of hip fracture per 10,000 person-years by gender were calculated for the period 1999–2013. Time trends were tested by age-adjusted Poisson regression.

Results

From 1999 through 2013 there were 140,136 hip fractures in persons aged 50 years and above. Age-adjusted hip fracture incidence rates declined by 20.4 % (95 % CI: 18.6–20.1) in women and 10.8 % (95 % CI: 7.8–13.8) in men, corresponding to an average annual age-adjusted decline of 1.5 % in women and 0.8 % in men. Except for the oldest men, hip fracture rates declined in all age-groups 70 years and older. The average annual number of fractures decreased in women (−0.3 %) and increased in men (+1.1 %).

Conclusions

During the past 15 years, hip fracture rates have declined in Norway. The forecasted growing number of older individuals might, however, cause an increase in the absolute number of fractures, with a substantial societal economic and public health burden.

Keywords

Age Gender Hip fracture Incidence Trend 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors are deeply grateful to Tomislav Dimoski (The Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services), the Statistics Norway and the staff at the Department of Pharmacoepidemiology (Norwegian Institute of Public Health) contributing to the collection and encryption of the hip fracture data.

NOREPOS (The NORwegian EPidemiologic Osteoporosis Studies) is a collaboration between epidemiologic osteoporosis studies, which are sub-studies within large population-based surveys in four districts of Norway (Tromsø, Nord-Trøndelag, Hordaland, Oslo). The NOREPOS Hip fracture Database (NORHip) includes all hospitalizations for hip fracture in Norway.

Authors’ roles

Conception and design: AJS, KH, HEM, GST, CGG, NE, GG, SF, BS, and TKO.

Analyses and interpretation of data: AJS, KH, HEM, and TKO.

Drafting: AJS, KH, HEM, and TKO.

Critically revising the paper: AJS, KH, HEM, GST, CGG, NE, GG, SF, BS, and TKO.

Final approval of the version to be published: AJS, KH, HEM, GST, CGG, NE, GG, SF, BS, and TKO.

Compliance with ethical standards

The study and the linkages of data were approved by the Regional Committee for Medical and Health Research Ethics, the Norwegian Data Protection Agency, the Directorate of Health and Statistics Norway.

Conflict of interests

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR, Earl SC, Harvey NC, Dennison EM, Melton LJ, Cummings SR, Kanis JA; IOF CSA Working Group on Fracture Epidemiology (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22:1277–88, EpubGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, Fuleihan Gel-H (2014) Secular trends in hip fractures worldwide: opposing trends East versus West. J Bone Miner Res 29:1745–55CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cauley JA, Chalhoub D, Kassem AM, Fuleihan Gel-H (2014) Geographic and ethnic disparities in osteoporotic fractures. Nat Rev Endocrinol 10(6):338–51, Epub 2014 Apr 22Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cheng SY, Levy AR, Lefaivre KA, Guy P, Kuramoto L, Sobolev B (2011) Geographic trends in incidence of hip fractures: a comprehensive literature review. Osteoporos Int 22:2575–86, Epub 2011 Apr 12CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chau PH, Wong M, Lee A, Ling M, Woo J (2013) Trends in hip fracture incidence and mortality in Chinese population from Hong Kong 2001–09. Age Ageing 42:229–33, Epub 2012 Nov 29CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tsukutani Y, Hagino H, Ito Y, Nagashima H (2015) Epidemiology of fragility fractures in Sakaiminato, Japan: incidence, secular trends, and prognosis. Osteoporos Int, May 19. Epub ahead of printGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Zingmond DS, Melton LJ 3rd, Silverman SL (2004) Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 15:603–10, Epub 2004 Mar 4CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wright NC, Saag KG, Curtis JR, Smith WK, Kilgore ML, Morrisey MA, Yun H, Zhang J, Delzell ES (2012) Recent trends in hip fracture rates by race/ethnicity among older US adults. J Bone Miner Res 27:2325–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lofthus CM, Osnes EK, Falch JA, Kaastad TS, Kristiansen IS, Nordsletten L, Stensvold I, Meyer HE (2001) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Oslo, Norway. Bone 29:413–8CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE, Center JR, Emaus N, Tell GS, Schei B, Tverdal A, Gjesdal CG, Grimnes G, Forsmo S, Eisman JA, Søgaard AJ (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999–2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27:807–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergård M, Compston J, Cooper C, Stenmark J, McCloskey EV, Jönsson B, Kanis JA (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. A report prepared in collaboration with the International Osteoporosis Foundation (IOF) and the European Federation of Pharmaceutical Industry Associations (EFPIA). Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):136, Epub 2013 Oct 11CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sosa M, Saavedra P, de Tejada MJ, Navarro M, Cabrera D, Melton LJ 3rd (2015) Trends in the incidence of hip fracture in Gran Canaria, Canary Islands, Spain: 2007–2011 versus 1989–1993. Osteoporos Int 26:1361–6, Epub 2015 Jan 9CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siggeirsdottir K, Aspelund T, Jonsson BY, Mogensen B, Gudmundsson EF, Gudnason V, Sigurdsson G (2014) Epidemiology of fractures in Iceland and secular trends in major osteoporotic fractures 1989–2008. Osteoporos Int 25:211–9, Epub 2013 Jul 2. Erratum in: Osteoporos Int 2014;25:221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jürisson M, Vorobjov S, Kallikorm R, Lember M, Uusküla A (2015) The incidence of hip fractures in Estonia, 2005–2012. Osteoporos Int 26:77–84, Epub 2014 Aug 15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Coleman D (2006) Immigration and ethnic change in low-fertility countries: a third demographic transition. Popul Dev Rev 32:401–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Omsland TK, Magnus JH (2014) Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures. Osteoporos Int 25:2493–6, Epub 2014 JulCrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rosengren BE, Ahlborg HG, Mellström D, Nilsson JÅ, Björk J, Karlsson MK (2012) Secular trends in Swedish hip fractures 1987–2002: birth cohort and period effects. Epidemiology 23:623–30CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Samelson EJ, Zhang Y, Kiel DP, Hannan MT, Felson DT (2002) Effect of birth cohort on risk of hip fracture: age-specific incidence rates in the Framingham Study. Am J Public Health 92:858–62CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Alves SM, Castiglione D, Oliveira CM, de Sousa B, Pina MF (2014) Age-period-cohort effects in the incidence of hip fractures: political and economic events are coincident with changes in risk. Osteoporos Int 25:711–20, Epub 2013 Aug 2CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Høiberg MP, Gram J, Hermann P, Brixen K, Haugeberg G (2014) The incidence of hip fractures in Norway -accuracy of the national Norwegian patient registry. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 15:372. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-15-372 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. J. Søgaard
    • 1
  • K. Holvik
    • 1
  • H. E. Meyer
    • 1
    • 2
  • G. S. Tell
    • 1
    • 3
  • C. G. Gjesdal
    • 4
    • 5
  • N. Emaus
    • 6
  • G. Grimnes
    • 7
    • 8
  • B. Schei
    • 9
    • 10
  • S. Forsmo
    • 9
  • T. K. Omsland
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Norwegian Institute of Public HealthNydalenNorway
  2. 2.Institute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Department of Global Public Health and Primary CareUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  4. 4.Department of Clinical ScienceUniversity of BergenBergenNorway
  5. 5.Department of RheumatologyHaukeland University HospitalBergenNorway
  6. 6.Department of Health and Care SciencesUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
  7. 7.Department of Clinical MedicineUiT The Arctic University of NorwayTromsøNorway
  8. 8.Division of Internal MedicineUniversity Hospital of North Norway TromsøTromsøNorway
  9. 9.Department of Public Health and General PracticeNorwegian University of Science and TechnologyTrondheimNorway
  10. 10.Department of Obstetrics and GynecologySt. Olavs HospitalTrondheimNorway

Personalised recommendations