Osteoporosis International

, Volume 27, Issue 3, pp 1245–1249 | Cite as

Differential sclerostin and parathyroid hormone response to exercise in boys and men

  • B. Falk
  • F. Haddad
  • P. Klentrou
  • W. Ward
  • K. Kish
  • Y. Mezil
  • S. Radom-Aizik
Short Communication

Abstract

Summary

Physical exercise benefits bone structure and mineralization, especially in children. Immediately following high-impact exercise, PTH increased and returned to resting values within 24 h in both groups, while sclerostin increased in men but not in boys. The underlying mechanisms and implication of this age-related differential response are unclear.

Introduction

Circulating sclerostin, a negative regulator of bone, decreases during puberty and increases in adulthood. Parathyroid hormone (PTH) is inversely related to sclerostin. In mice, sclerostin decreases following 24 h of mechanical stimulation. Its response to exercise in humans and, especially in children, in whom high-impact physical exercise benefits bone structure and mineralization is unclear. The aim of this study was to investigate the acute response of sclerostin to a single exercise session of high mechanical loading and the corresponding changes in PTH in boys and men.

Methods

Twelve boys (10.2 ± 0.4 years old) and 17 young men (22.7 ± 0.8 years old) underwent a protocol of plyometric exercises (total 144 jumps). Blood samples were collected pre-, 5 min, 1 h, and 24 h post-exercise.

Results

Boys had significantly higher resting values of sclerostin compared with men (150 ± 37 vs. 111 ± 34 pg/ml, respectively, p = 0.006). Following exercise, sclerostin markedly increased in men but this response was attenuated in boys (at 5 min: 51 ± 38 vs. 14 ± 21 %, respectively, p = 0.005). PTH levels were similar in boys and men at rest and throughout the 24-h study period, increasing significantly (p < 0.001) 5 min after exercise, decreasing after 60 min post-exercise and returning to resting values within 24 h.

Conclusion

Although the PTH response was similar in boys and men, the sclerostin response was greater in men. The combined increases in PTH and sclerostin immediately post-exercise appear contrary to the accepted osteogenic effect of exercise. The underlying mechanisms and full implication of the differential response between children and adults need to be further examined.

Keywords

Bone Children Exercise Mechanical loading Osteocyte Sost 

References

  1. 1.
    Robling AG, Niziolek PJ, Baldridge LA et al (2008) Mechanical stimulation of bone in vivo reduces osteocyte expression of sost/sclerostin. J Biol Chem 283:5866–5875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turner CH, Warden SJ, Bellido T, Plotkin LI, Kumar N, Jasiuk I, Danzig J, Robling AG (2009) Mechanobiology of the skeleton. Sci Signal 2:pt3CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Li X, Ominsky MS, Niu QT et al (2008) Targeted deletion of the sclerostin gene in mice results in increased bone formation and bone strength. J Bone Miner Res 23:860–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Winkler DG, Sutherland MK, Geoghegan JC et al (2003) Osteocyte control of bone formation via sclerostin, a novel BMP antagonist. EMBO J 22:6267–6276CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kirmani S, Amin S, McCready LK, Atkinson EJ, Melton LJ 3rd, Muller R, Khosla S (2012) Sclerostin levels during growth in children. Osteoporos Int 23:1123–1130CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Balemans W, Ebeling M, Patel N et al (2001) Increased bone density in sclerosteosis is due to the deficiency of a novel secreted protein (SOST). Hum Mol Genet 10:537–543CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Balemans W, Patel N, Ebeling M et al (2002) Identification of a 52 kb deletion downstream of the SOST gene in patients with van Buchem disease. J Med Genet 39:91–97CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Durosier C, van Lierop A, Ferrari S, Chevalley T, Papapoulos S, Rizzoli R (2013) Association of circulating sclerostin with bone mineral mass, microstructure, and turnover biochemical markers in healthy elderly men and women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 98:3873–3883CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Moustafa A, Sugiyama T, Prasad J, Zaman G, Gross TS, Lanyon LE, Price JS (2012) Mechanical loading-related changes in osteocyte sclerostin expression in mice are more closely associated with the subsequent osteogenic response than the peak strains engendered. Osteoporos Int 23:1225–1234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Tu X, Rhee Y, Condon KW et al (2012) Sost downregulation and local Wnt signaling are required for the osteogenic response to mechanical loading. Bone 50:209–217CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ardawi MS, Rouzi AA, Qari MH (2012) Physical activity in relation to serum sclerostin, insulin-like growth factor-1, and bone turnover markers in healthy premenopausal women: a cross-sectional and a longitudinal study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 97:3691–3699CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kish K, Mezil Y, Ward WE, Klentrou P, Falk B (2015) Effects of plyometric exercise session on markers of bone turnover in boys and young men. Eur J Appl PhysiolGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, McKay HA (2002) Is there a critical period for bone response to weight-bearing exercise in children and adolescents? A systematic review. Br J Sports Med 36:250–257, discussion 257 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    MacKelvie KJ, Khan KM, Petit MA, Janssen PA, McKay HA (2003) A school-based exercise intervention elicits substantial bone health benefits: a 2-year randomized controlled trial in girls. Pediatrics 112, e447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Slaughter MH, Lohman TG, Boileau BA (1988) Skinfold equations for estimation of body fatness in children and youth. Hum Biol 60:709–723PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Tanner JM (1962) Growth at adolescence. Blackwell Scientific Publications, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mirwald RL, Baxter-Jones AD, Bailey DA, Beunen GP (2002) An assessment of maturity from anthropometric measurements. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34:689–694PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Godin G, Shephard RJ (1985) A simple method to assess exercise behavior in the community. Can J Appl Sport Sci 10:141–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Aaron DJ, Kriska AM, Dearwater SR, Cauley JA, Metz KF, LaPorte RE (1995) Reproducibility and validity of an epidemiologic questionnaire to assess past year physical activity in adolescents. Am J Epidemiol 142:191–201CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Mezil YA, Allison D, Kish K, Ditor D, Ward WE, Tsiani E, Klentrou P (2014) Response of bone turnover markers and cytokines to high-intensity low-impact exercise. Med Sci Sports ExercGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Eliakim A, Brasel JA, Mohan S, Barstow TJ, Berman N, Cooper DM (1996) Physical fitness, endurance training, and the growth hormone-insulin-like growth factor I system in adolescent females. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 81:3986–3992PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stewart LK, Flynn MG, Campbell WW, Craig BA, Robinson JP, Timmerman KL, McFarlin BK, Coen PM, Talbert E (2007) The influence of exercise training on inflammatory cytokines and C-reactive protein. Med Sci Sports Exerc 39:1714–1719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Morse A, McDonald MM, Kelly NH, Melville KM, Schindeler A, Kramer I, Kneissel M, van der Meulen MC, Little DG (2014) Mechanical load increases in bone formation via a sclerostin-independent pathway. J Bone Miner Res 29:2456–2467CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Applied Health SciencesBrock UniversitySt. CatharinesCanada
  2. 2.Pediatric Exercise and Genomics Research CenterUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations