Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 26, Issue 1, pp 93–102 | Cite as

Dysmobility syndrome and mortality risk in US men and women age 50 years and older

  • A. C. LookerEmail author
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Mortality risk was significantly elevated in older adults from NHANES 1999–2002 with dysmobility syndrome.

Introduction

Dysmobility syndrome was recently proposed as an approach to evaluate the musculoskeletal health of older persons, but data linking this syndrome to adverse outcomes are currently lacking. The present study used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 1999–2002 to assess the relationship between dysmobility and mortality in adults age 50 years and older by age, sex, and race or ethnicity.

Methods

Dysmobility was defined as three or more of the following: high body fat, osteoporosis, low muscle mass, low muscle strength, slow gait speed, or falling risk. Body composition and bone density were assessed with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Gait speed was measured via a timed walk, muscle strength via isokinetic knee extension, and fall risk via self-reported balance problems in the past year. Hazard ratios (HRs) for mortality were calculated with Cox proportional hazard models.

Results

Twenty-two percent of adults age 50+ years had dysmobility in 1999–2002. Mortality risk by dysmobility varied significantly by age (p interaction = 0.001). HRs for those aged 50–69 years were 3.63 (95 % confidence interval (CI) 2.69, 4.90) and 2.59 (95 % CI 1.82, 3.69), respectively, before and after adjusting for all confounders, compared with 1.46 (95 % CI 1.07, 1.99) and 1.23 (95 % CI 0.89, 1.69) for those aged 70+ years. The relationship was significant when examined by sex or race/ethnicity within age group for most subgroups.

Conclusions

Dysmobility was associated with increased mortality risk in adults age 50 years and older, with risk being higher in those age 50–69 years than in those age 70+ years.

Keywords

Dysmobility Longitudinal study Mortality NHANES 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    Binkley N, Krueger D, Buehring B (2013) What’s in a name revisited: should osteoporosis and sarcopenia be considered components of “dysmobility syndrome?”. Osteoporos Int 24:2955–2959PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zipf GCM, Porter KS, Ostchega Y, Lewis BG, Dostal J (2013) National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey: plan and operations, 1999–2010. National Center for Health Statistics, Hyattsville MD. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/series/sr_01/SR01_056.pdf
  3. 3.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics (2012) NCHS data linked to mortality files. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data_access/data_linkage/mortality.htm
  4. 4.
    Dufour AB, Hannan MT, Murabito JM, Kiel DP, McLean RR (2013) Sarcopenia definitions considering body size and fat mass are associated with mobility limitations: the Framingham study. J Gerontol A: Biol Med Sci 68:168–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baumgartner RN, Koehler KM, Gallagher D, Romero L, Heymsfield SB, Ross RR, Garry PJ, Lindeman RD (1998) Epidemiology of sarcopenia among the elderly in New Mexico. Am J Epidemiol 147:755–763PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cruz-Jentoft AJ, Baeyens JP, Bauer JM et al (2010) Sarcopenia: European consensus on definition and diagnosis: report of the European working group on sarcopenia in older people. Age Ageing 39:412–423PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fielding RA, Vellas B, Evans WJ et al (2011) Sarcopenia: an undiagnosed condition in older adults. Current consensus definition: prevalence, etiology, and consequences. International working group on sarcopenia. J Am Med Dir Assoc 12:249–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Schousboe JT, Shepherd JA, Bilezikian JP, Baim S (2013) Executive summary of the 2013 International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Conference on bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom 16:455–466PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics (2004) Body composition procedure manual. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_03_04/bc.pdf
  10. 10.
    Melton LJ, Looker AC, Shepherd JA, O’Connor MK, Achenbach SJ, Riggs BL, Khosla S (2005) Osteoporosis assessment by whole body region vs. site-specific DXA. Osteoporos Int 16:1558–1564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanis JA, Melton LJ, Christiansen C, Johnston CC, Khaltaev N (1994) The diagnosis of osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Res 9:1137–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Looker AC, Borrud LG, Dawson-Hughes B, Shepherd JA, Wright NC (2012) Osteoporosis or low bone mass at the femur neck or lumbar spine in older adults: United States, 2005–2008. NCHS Data Brief 1–8Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Centers for Disease Control and Prevention National Center for Health Statistics (2001) Muscle strength procedure manual. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes_01_02/muscle_strength_year_3.pdf
  14. 14.
    Ostchega Y, Dillon CF, Lindle R, Carroll M, Hurley BF (2004) Isokinetic leg muscle strength in older Americans and its relationship to a standardized walk test: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999–2000. J Am Geriatr Soc 52:977–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Studenski SA, Peters KW, Alley DE et al (2014) The FNIH sarcopenia project: rationale, study description, conference recommendations, and final estimates. J Gerontol A: Biol Med Sci 69:547–558CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Danneskiold-Samsøe B, Bartels EM, Bülow PM, Lund H, Stockmarr A, Holm CC, Wätjen I, Appleyard M, Bliddal H (2009) Isokinetic and isometric muscle strength in a healthy population with special reference to age and gender. Acta Physiol 197:1–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Research Triangle Institute (2008) SUDAAN language manual, release 10.0. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle ParkGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mirel L BV, Curtin LR, Zhang C (2009) Different approaches for non-response adjustment to statistical weights in the continous NHANES (2003–2004). 2009 Federal Committee on Statistical Methodology Research Conference. http://fcsm.sites.usa.gov/files/2014/05/2009FCSM_Mirel_V-B.pdf
  19. 19.
    Schemper M, Stare J (1996) Explained variation in survival analysis. Stat Med 15:1999–2012PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gellert C, Schöttker B, Brenner H (2012) Smoking and all-cause mortality in older people: systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med 172:837–844PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Janssen I, Mark AE (2007) Elevated body mass index and mortality risk in the elderly. Obes Rev Off J Int Assoc Study Obes 8:41–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Singh PN, Wang X (2001) Simulation study of the effect of the early mortality exclusion on confounding of the exposure-mortality relation by preexisting disease. Am J Epidemiol 154:963–971PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Allison DB, Heo M, Flanders DW, Faith MS, Carpenter KM, Williamson DF (1999) Simulation study of the effects of excluding early deaths on risk factor-mortality analyses in the presence of confounding due to occult disease: the example of body mass index. Ann Epidemiol 9:132–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Singh PN, Haddad E, Tonstad S, Fraser GE (2011) Does excess body fat maintained after the seventh decade decrease life expectancy? J Am Geriatr Soc 59:1003–1011PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Center for Health StatisticsCenters for Disease Control and PreventionHyattsvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations