Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 25, Issue 10, pp 2493–2496 | Cite as

Forecasting the burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures

  • T. K. OmslandEmail author
  • J. H. Magnus
Short Communication

Abstract

Summary

A growing elderly population is expected worldwide, and the rate of hip fractures is decisive for the future fracture burden. Significant declines in hip fracture rates in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK are required to counteract the impact of the ageing effects.

Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the consequences of the expected growth of the elderly population worldwide on the hip fracture burden using Norway as an example. Furthermore, we wanted to estimate the decline in hip fracture rates required to counteract the anticipated increase in the burden of hip fracture for Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.

Methods

The burden of future postmenopausal hip fractures in Norway were estimated given (1) constant age-specific rates, (2) continued decline, and (3) different cohort scenarios. Based on population projection estimates and population age-specific hip fracture rates in women 65 years and older, we calculated the required declines in hip fracture rates needed to counteract the growing elderly populations in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.

Results

The level of age-specific hip fracture rates had a huge impact on the future hip fracture burden in Norway. Even if the hip fracture rates decline at the same speed, a 22 % increase in the burden of hip fractures can be expected by 2040. An annual decline in hip fracture rates of 1.1–2.2 % until 2040 is required to counteract the effects of the growing elderly population on the future burden of hip fractures in Norway, the USA, France, Germany, and the UK.

Conclusions

Hip fracture rates have a great impact on the burden of hip fractures. The rates will have to decline significantly to counteract the impact of a growing elderly population. A change in preventive strategies and further studies are warranted to identify the complex causes associated to hip fractures.

Keywords

Burden Hip fracture Incidence Postmenopausal Women 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

None.

References

  1. 1.
    United-Nations-Population-Fund. Ageing in the 21st century: a celebration and a challenge. 2012Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Brown CA, Starr AZ, Nunley JA (2012) Analysis of past secular trends of hip fractures and predicted number in the future 2010-2050. J Orthop Trauma 26(2):117–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cawston H, Maravic M, Fardellone P et al (2012) Epidemiological burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in France from 2010 to 2020: estimations from a disease model. Arch Osteoporos 7(1–2):237–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gauthier A, Kanis JA, Jiang Y et al (2012) Burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Germany: estimations from a disease model. Arch Osteoporos 7(1–2):209–218PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gauthier A, Kanis JA, Jiang Y et al (2011) Epidemiological burden of postmenopausal osteoporosis in the UK from 2010 to 2021: estimations from a disease model. Arch Osteoporos 6(1–2):179–188PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cooper C, Cole ZA, Holroyd CR et al (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 22(5):1277–1288PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Omsland TK, Holvik K, Meyer HE et al (2012) Hip fractures in Norway 1999-2008: time trends in total incidence and second hip fracture rates: a NOREPOS study. Eur J Epidemiol 27(10):807–814PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Abrahamsen B, Vestergaard P (2010) Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent of use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997-2006. Osteoporos Int 21(3):373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brauer CA, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler DM, Rosen AB (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302(14):1573–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Icks A, Arend W, Becker C, Rapp K, Jungbluth P, Haastert B (2013) Incidence of hip fractures in Germany, 1995-2010. Arch Osteoporos 8(1–2):140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Nilson F, Moniruzzaman S, Gustavsson J, Andersson R (2013) Trends in hip fracture incidence rates among the elderly in Sweden 1987-2009. J Public Health (Oxf) 35(1):125–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Korhonen N, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Sievanen H, Palvanen M, Kannus P (2013) Continuous decline in incidence of hip fracture: nationwide statistics from Finland between 1970 and 2010. Osteoporos Int 24(5):1599–1603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosengren BE, Ahlborg HG, Mellstrom D, Nilsson JA, Bjork J, Karlsson MK (2012) Secular trends in Swedish hip fractures 1987-2002: birth cohort and period effects. Epidemiology 23(4):623–630PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jean S, O’Donnell S, Lagace C, et al (2013) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada: an age-period-cohort analysis. J Bone Miner ResGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    StatBank-Norway. StatBank Norway (Statistics Norway) http://ssb.no/en/statistikkbanken. 2013. Accessed 14 Oct 2013
  16. 16.
    United-States-Census-Bureau. Population Counts and 2012 Population Projections. http://www.census.gov/. 2013. http://www.census.gov/. Accessed 7 Apr 2013
  17. 17.
    Eurostat. Population projection. European Commission, http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/population/data/database. 2013. Accessed 14 Oct 2013
  18. 18.
    Requena G, Abbing-Karahagopian V, Huerta C et al (2014) Incidence rates and trends of hip/femur fractures in five European countries: comparison using e-healthcare records databases. Calcif Tissue Int 94(6):580–589PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Langley J, Samaranayaka A, Davie G, Campbell AJ (2011) Age, cohort and period effects on hip fracture incidence: analysis and predictions from New Zealand data 1974-2007. Osteoporos Int 22(1):105–111PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Health and SocietyUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations