Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 25, Issue 4, pp 1345–1355 | Cite as

Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy following initiation within a secondary fracture prevention program: a randomised controlled trial of specialist vs. non-specialist management

Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Following initiation of oral bisphosphonate therapy through a secondary fracture prevention program, 2-year treatment compliance and persistence remained high and were similar in patients randomised to follow-up by either the program or primary care physician. Thus, community-based and specialist management are equally effective in supporting compliance and persistence with anti-osteoporotic treatments.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether management by a secondary fracture prevention (SFP) program (aka “fracture liaison service”) results in better compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy than follow-up by the primary care physician, after initiation within an SFP program.

Methods

This prospective RCT included 102 patients with incident osteoporotic fractures referred to a SFP program in Sydney, Australia. Following oral bisphosphonate therapy initiation, patients were randomised to either 6-monthly follow-up with the SFP program (group A) or referral to their primary care physician with a single SFP program visit at 24 months (group B). Compliance and persistence to treatment were measured using pharmaceutical claims data. Predictors of compliance and persistence and associations between compliance and persistence, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) or bone resorption marker, urinary deoxypyridinoline over 24 months were analysed.

Results

The median medication possession ratio at 24 months was 0.78 (IQR, 0.50–0.93) in group A and 0.79 (IQR, 0.48–0.96) in group B (p = 0.68). Persistence at 24 months was also similar in both groups (64 vs. 61 %, respectively; p = 0.75). After adjusting for confounders, patients in group A were not more likely to be compliant (OR, 1.06; 95 % CI, 0.46–2.47) or persistent (HR, 0.83; 95 % CI, 0.27–1.67) than those randomised to group B. Time-based changes in BMD or bone turnover were not associated with compliance or persistence.

Conclusion

Compliance and persistence to oral bisphosphonate therapy remain high amongst patients initiated within an SFP program, with community-based and SFP program management being equally effective in maintaining therapeutic compliance and persistence over 2 years. These results indicate that one of the main functions of an SFP program may be the initiation of therapy rather than continuous patient monitoring.

Keywords

Compliance Osteoporosis Persistence Pharmaceutical claims data Secondary fracture prevention program Treatment 

Notes

Acknowledgments

We thank Kathy Wu, Anna Lih, Paul Lee, Veena Jayadev, Rohit Rajagopal, Damien Smith, Belinda Poon, Chris Muir, Bev White, Lynley Robinson and Klaus Sommer and his team for their invaluable contributions to data collection and entry. Thanks to Caroline Sullivan (coordinator and research assistant) and Fiona Blyth for reviewing the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

Sallie Pearson is a Cancer Institute New South Wales Career Development Fellow 12/CDF/2-25.

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organisation (2001) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: report of a WHO study group. Geneva: WHO, 1994 (Technical Report Series 843. J Am Med Assoc 285:785–795CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A (2000) Long-term risk of osteoporotic fracture in Malmo. Osteoporos Int 11:669–674PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen ND, Ahlborg HG, Center JR, Eisman JA, Nguyen TV (2007) Residual lifetime risk of fractures in women and men. J Bone Miner Res 22:781–788PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bliuc D, Nguyen ND, Milch VE, Nguyen TV, Eisman JA, Centre JR (2009) Mortality risk associated with low-trauma osteoporotic fracture and subsequent fracture in men and women. J Am Med Assoc 301:513–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Center JR, Nguyen TV, Schneider D, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (1999) Mortality after all major types of osteoporotic fracture in men and women: an observational study. Lancet 353:878–882PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Center J, Bliuc D, Nguyen TV, Eisman J (2007) Risk of subsequent fracture after low-trauma fracture in men and women. J Am Med Assoc 297:387–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Langsetmo L, Goltzman D, Kovacs CS, Adachi JD, Hanley DA, Kreiger N, Josse R, Papaioannou A, Olszynski WP, Jamal SA (2009) Repeat low-trauma fractures occur frequently among men and women who have osteopenic BMD. J Bone Miner Res 24(9):1515–1522PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    van Geel TA, van Helden S, Geusens PP, Winkens B, Dinant GJ (2009) Clinical subsequent fractures cluster in time after first fractures. Ann Rheum Dis 68(1):99–102PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Andrade SE, Majumdar SR, Chan AK, Buist DSM, Go AS, Goodman M, Smith DH, Platt R, Gurwitz JH (2003) Low frequency of treatment of osteoporosis among postmenopausal women following a fracture. Arch Intern Med 162:2052–2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE (2004) Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 15(10):767–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Follin SL, Black BS, McDermott MT (2003) Lack of diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in men and women after hip fracture. Pharmacotherapy 23(2):190–198PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35(5):293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Port L, Center J, Briffa NK, Nguyen T, Cumming R, Eisman J (2003) Osteoporotic fracture: missed opportunity for intervention. Osteoporos Int 14(9):780–784PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Shibli-Rahhal A, Vaughan-Sarrazin MS, Richardson K, Cram P (2011) Testing and treatment for osteoporosis following hip fracture in an integrated U.S. healthcare delivery system. Osteoporos Int 22(12):2973–2980PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Leslie WD, Giangregorio LM, Yogendran M, Azimaee M, Morin S, Metge C, Caetano P, Lix LM (2012) A population-based analysis of the post-fracture care gap 1996–2008: the situation is not improving. Osteoporos Int 23(5):1623–1629PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ganda K, Puech M, Chen JS, Speerin R, Bleasel J, Center JR, Eisman JA, March L, Seibel MJ (2012) Models of care for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 23(1):97–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sale JEM, Beaton D, Posen J, Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch E (2011) Systematic review on interventions to improve osteoporosis investigation and treatment in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 22:2067–2082PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cotte FE, Fardellone P, Mercier F, Gaudin AF, Roux C (2010) Adherence to monthly and weekly oral bisphosphonates in women with osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 21(1):145–155PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kothawala P, Badamgarav E, Ryu S, Miller RM, Halbert RJ (2007) Systematic review and meta-analysis of real-world adherence to drug therapy for osteoporosis. Mayo Clin Proc 82(12)):1493–1501PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cadarette SM, Solomon DH, Katz JN, Patrick AR, Brookhart MA (2011) Adherence to osteoporosis drugs and fracture prevention: no evidence of healthy adherer bias in a frail cohort of seniors. Osteoporos Int 22(3):943–954PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Imaz I, Zegarra P, Gonzalez-Enriquez J, Rubio B, Alcazar R, Amate JM (2010) Poor bisphosphonate adherence for treatment of osteoporosis increases fracture risk: systematic review and meta-analysis. Osteoporos Int 21(11):1943–1951PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Patrick AR, Brookhart MA, Losina E, Schousboe JT, Cadarette SM, Mogun H, Solomon DH (2010) The complex relation between bisphosphonate adherence and fracture reduction. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 95(7):3251–3259PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sampalis JS, Adachi JD, Rampakakis E, Vaillancourt J, Karellis A, Kindundu C (2011) Long-term impact of adherence to oral bisphosphonates on osteoporotic fracture incidence. J Bone Miner Res 7(5):767–775Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cooper MS, Palmer AJ, Seibel MJ (2012) Cost-effectiveness of the concord minimal trauma fracture liaison service, a prospective, controlled fracture prevention study. Osteoporos Int 23(1):97–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lih A, Nandapalan H, Kim M, Yap C, Lee P, Ganda K, Seibel MJ (2011) Targeted intervention reduces refracture rates in patients with incident non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures: a 4-year prospective controlled study. Osteoporos Int 22(3):849–858PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Kanis JA (2002) Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk. Lancet 359(9321):1929–1936. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(02)08761-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Cramer JA, Roy A, Burrell A, Fairchild CJ, Fuldeore MJ, Ollendorf DA, Wong PK (2008) Medication compliance and persistence: terminology and definitions. Value Health 11(1):44–47PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Adachi J, Lynch N, Middelhoven H, Hunjan M, Cowell W (2007) The association between compliance and persistence with bisphosphonate therapy and fracture risk: a review. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 8:97PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Dell R, Greene D, Schelkun SR, Williams K (2008) Osteoporosis disease management: the role of the orthopaedic surgeon. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90(Suppl 4):188–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Siris SE, Harris ST, Rosen C, Barr CE, Arvesen JN, Abbott TA, Silverman S (2006) Adherence to bisphosphonate therapy and fracture rates in osteoporotic women: relationship to vertebral and nonvertebral fractures from 2 US claims databases. Mayo Clin Proc 81(8):1013–1022PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Gold DT, Safi W, Trinh H (2006) Patient preference and adherence: comparative US studies between two bisphosphonates, weekly risedronate and monthly ibandronate. Curr Med Res Opin 22(12):2383–2391PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Recker RR, Gallagher R, MacCosbe PE (2005) Effect of dosing frequency on bisphosphonate medication adherence in a large longitudinal cohort of women. Mayo Clin Proc 80(7):856–861PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Netelenbos JC, Geusens PP, Ypma G, Buijs SJ (2011) Adherence and profile of non-persistence in patients treated for osteoporosis—a large-scale, long-term retrospective study in The Netherlands. Osteoporos Int 22(5):1537–1546PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Boudou L, Gerbay B, Chopin F, Ollagnier E, Collet P, Thomas T (2011) Management of osteoporosis in fracture liaison service associated with long-term adherence to treatment. Osteoporos Int 22(7):2099–2106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Ojeda-Bruno S, Naranjo A, Francisco-Hernandez F, Erausquin C, Rua-Figueroa I, Quevedo JC, Rodriguez-Lozano C (2011) Secondary prevention program for osteoporotic fractures and long-term adherence to bisphosphonates. Osteoporos Int 22(6):1821–1828PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Eekman DA, van Helden SH, Huisman AM, Verhaar HJ, Bultink IE, Geusens PP, Lips P, Lems WF (2013) Optimizing fracture prevention: the fracture liaison service, an observational study. Osteoporos Int 24(4):1235–1246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Garber MC, Nau DP, Erickson SR, Aikens JE, Lawrence JB (2004) The concordance of self-report with other measures of medication adherence: a summary of the literature. Med Care 42(7):649–652PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, Bellerose D, McAlister FA, Russell AS, Hanley DA, Garg S, Lier DA, Maksymowych WP, Morrish DW, Rowe BH (2011) Nurse case-manager vs multifaceted intervention to improve quality of osteoporosis care after wrist fracture: randomized controlled pilot study. Osteoporos Int 22(1):223–230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Clowes JA (2004) The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89(3):1117–1123PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Eastell R, Vrijens B, Cahall DL, Ringe JD, Garnero P, Watts NB (2011) Bone turnover markers and bone mineral density response with risedronate therapy: relationship with fracture risk and patient adherence. J Bone Miner Res 26(7):1662–1669PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Delmas PD, Vrijens B, Eastell R, Roux C, Pols HA, Ringe JD, Grauer A, Cahall D, Watts NB (2007) Effect of monitoring bone turnover markers on persistence with risedronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92(4):1296–1304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Bone Research ProgramANZAC Research Institute, The University of SydneyConcordAustralia
  2. 2.Department of Endocrinology & MetabolismConcord Repatriation General HospitalConcordAustralia
  3. 3.Pharmacoepidemiology & Pharmaceutical Policy Research Group, Faculty of Pharmacy, School of Public Health, Sydney Medical SchoolThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations