Osteoporosis International

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 325–337

Comparative cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Europe, using the FRAX algorithm

  • K. Kim
  • A. Svedbom
  • X. Luo
  • S. Sutradhar
  • J. A. Kanis
Original Article

DOI: 10.1007/s00198-013-2521-4

Cite this article as:
Kim, K., Svedbom, A., Luo, X. et al. Osteoporos Int (2014) 25: 325. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2521-4

Abstract

Summary

Bazedoxifene and raloxifene were evaluated in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis from health economic perspective in Europe. Based on a computer-based algorithm calculating efficacy of the treatments, bazedoxifene appears to be a cost-effective strategy compared to raloxifene, particularly in patients at high fracture risk.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in eight European countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK.

Methods

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, which is a computer-based algorithm to calculate fracture probability using clinical risk factors alone or with bone mineral density, was incorporated in a Markov Tunnel model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg vs. raloxifene 60 mg in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The efficacy of bazedoxifene and raloxifene for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures was measured as a function of the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture. The model estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefit (NMB) from a healthcare perspective, given the willingness to pay €30,000.

Results

In postmenopausal osteoporotic women, bazedoxifene was a cost saving strategy compared to raloxifene in the countries studied. The median NMB of bazedoxifene compared to raloxifene increased monotonically with the 10-year fracture probability. In general, the median NMB became greater than 0 in women with 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture between 5 and 10 % or above. The impact on results by varying the assumptions in the model was examined in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

Bazedoxifene appears to be a cost-effective strategy compared to raloxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Europe, particularly in patients at high fracture risk.

Keywords

Bazedoxifene Cost-effectiveness Fracture FRAX Osteoporosis Raloxifene 

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kim
    • 1
  • A. Svedbom
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. Luo
    • 3
  • S. Sutradhar
    • 4
  • J. A. Kanis
    • 5
  1. 1.OptumInsightStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Unit of Dermatology; Department of MedicineKarolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden
  3. 3.Pfizer, Inc.GrotonUSA
  4. 4.PfizerNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.University of Sheffield Medical SchoolSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations