Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 25, Issue 1, pp 325–337 | Cite as

Comparative cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis in Europe, using the FRAX algorithm

  • K. KimEmail author
  • A. Svedbom
  • X. Luo
  • S. Sutradhar
  • J. A. Kanis
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

Bazedoxifene and raloxifene were evaluated in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis from health economic perspective in Europe. Based on a computer-based algorithm calculating efficacy of the treatments, bazedoxifene appears to be a cost-effective strategy compared to raloxifene, particularly in patients at high fracture risk.

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to compare cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene and raloxifene in eight European countries: Belgium, France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, and the UK.

Methods

The Fracture Risk Assessment Tool, which is a computer-based algorithm to calculate fracture probability using clinical risk factors alone or with bone mineral density, was incorporated in a Markov Tunnel model to evaluate cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene 20 or 40 mg vs. raloxifene 60 mg in postmenopausal osteoporotic women. The efficacy of bazedoxifene and raloxifene for vertebral and non-vertebral fractures was measured as a function of the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fracture. The model estimated the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio and net monetary benefit (NMB) from a healthcare perspective, given the willingness to pay €30,000.

Results

In postmenopausal osteoporotic women, bazedoxifene was a cost saving strategy compared to raloxifene in the countries studied. The median NMB of bazedoxifene compared to raloxifene increased monotonically with the 10-year fracture probability. In general, the median NMB became greater than 0 in women with 10-year probabilities of a major osteoporotic fracture between 5 and 10 % or above. The impact on results by varying the assumptions in the model was examined in sensitivity analysis.

Conclusion

Bazedoxifene appears to be a cost-effective strategy compared to raloxifene for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women in Europe, particularly in patients at high fracture risk.

Keywords

Bazedoxifene Cost-effectiveness Fracture FRAX Osteoporosis Raloxifene 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was sponsored by Pfizer. Kun Kim and Axel Svedbom are employees of OptumInsight, who were paid consultants to Pfizer in connection with the development of this manuscript. The economic modeling and validation work was performed at OptumInsight, and OptumInsight is also responsible for the data storage.

Conflicts of interest

Xuemei Luo is an employee of Pfizer, and Santosh Sutradhar was an employee of Pfizer at the time this work was conducted. As employees of OptumInsight, Kun Kim and Axel Svedbom have provided consultancy services to numerous companies involved in the marketing of treatment for osteoporosis.

References

  1. 1.
    Cooper C (1999) Epidemiology of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 9(Suppl 2):S2–S8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hernlund E, Svedbom A, Ivergard M, Compston J, Joonsson B, Kanis J (2013) Osteoporosis in the European Union: medical management, epidemiology and economic burden. Archives of Osteoporosis (in press)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stone KL, Seeley DG, Lui LY, Cauley JA, Ensrud K, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (2003) BMD at multiple sites and risk of fracture of multiple types: long-term results from the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18:1947–1954. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.2003.18.11.1947 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pasco JA, Sanders KM, Hoekstra FM, Henry MJ, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2005) The human cost of fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:2046–2052. doi: 10.1007/s00198-005-1997-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, Stone K, Jamal SA, Ensrud K, Segal M, Genant HK, Cummings SR (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2004) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:897–902PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA (2006) An estimate of the worldwide prevalence and disability associated with osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 17:1726–1733PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Delmas PD, Bjarnason NH, Mitlak BH, Ravoux AC, Shah AS, Huster WJ, Draper M, Christiansen C (1997) Effects of raloxifene on bone mineral density, serum cholesterol concentrations, and uterine endometrium in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 337:1641–1647PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ettinger B, Black DM, Mitlak BH, Knickerbocker RK, Nickelsen T, Genant HK, Christiansen C, Delmas PD, Zanchetta JR, Stakkestad J, Gluer CC, Krueger K, Cohen FJ, Eckert S, Ensrud KE, Avioli LV, Lips P, Cummings SR (1999) Reduction of vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis treated with raloxifene: results from a 3-year randomized clinical trial. Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation (MORE) Investigators. Jama 282:637–645PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Silverman SL, Christiansen C, Genant HK, Vukicevic S, Zanchetta JR, de Villiers TJ, Constantine GD, Chines AA (2008) Efficacy of bazedoxifene in reducing new vertebral fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from a 3-year, randomized, placebo-, and active-controlled clinical trial *. J Bone Miner Res 23:1923–1934PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2009) Bazedoxifene reduces vertebral and clinical fractures in postmenopausal women at high risk assessed with FRAX. Bone 44:1049–1054PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Silverman SL, Chines AA, Kendler DL, Kung AW, Teglbjaerg CS, Felsenberg D, Mairon N, Constantine GD, Adachi JD (2011) Sustained efficacy and safety of bazedoxifene in preventing fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results of a 5-year, randomized, placebo-controlled study. Osteoporos Int 23:351–363. doi: 10.1007/s00198-011-1691-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tremollieres FA, Pouilles JM, Drewniak N, Laparra J, Ribot CA, Dargent-Molina P (2010) Fracture risk prediction using BMD and clinical risk factors in early postmenopausal women: sensitivity of the WHO FRAX tool. J Bone Miner Res 25:1002–1009. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.12 PubMedCentralPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Kanis JA, Hans D, Cooper C, Baim S, Bilezikian JP, Binkley N, Cauley JA, Compston JE, Dawson-Hughes B, El-Hajj FG, Johansson H, Leslie WD, Lewiecki EM, Luckey M, Oden A, Papapoulos SE, Poiana C, Rizzoli R, Wahl DA, McCloskey EV (2011) Interpretation and use of FRAX in clinical practice. Osteoporos Int 22:2395–2411PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (2006) Guideline on the evaluation of medicinal products in the treatment of primary osteoporosis. Ref CPMP/EWP/552/95Rev.2. CHMP, LondonGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2010) A meta-analysis of the efficacy of raloxifene on all clinical and vertebral fractures and its dependency on FRAX. BONE 47:729–735PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV (2011) A meta-analysis of the effect of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral and non-vertebral fracture in postmenopausal osteoporosis and the interaction with FRAX((R)). Osteoporos Int 22:2347–2355. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1474-0 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Vasireddy S, Kayan K, Pande K, Jalava T, Kanis JA (2009) Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy—additional results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study. Osteoporos Int 20:811–817PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Austin M, Siris E, Wang A, Lewiecki EM, Lorenc R, Libanati C, Kanis JA (2012) Denosumab reduces the risk of osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women, particularly in those with moderate to high fracture risk as assessed with FRAX. J Bone Miner Res 27:1480–1486. doi: 10.1002/jbmr.1606 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Borgstrom F, Strom O, Kleman M, McCloskey E, Johansson H, Oden A, Kanis JA (2010) Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene incorporating the FRAX(R) algorithm in a European perspective. Osteoporos Int 22:955–965. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1291-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. BONE 38:922–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Seeman E, Compston J, Adachi J, Brandi ML, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, Jonsson B, Pols H, Cramer JA (2007) Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy. Osteoporos Int 18:711–719. doi: 10.1007/s00198-006-0294-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (2008) Guidelines for pharmacoeconomic evaluations in Belgium: KCE reports 78C. The Belgian Health Care Knowledge Centre (KCE), BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    NICE (2008) Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://www.nice.org/uk/media/B52/A7/TAMethodsGuideUpdatedJune2008.pdf. Accessed June 2008
  25. 25.
    Lopez BJ, Oliva J, Antonanzas F, Garcia-Altes A, Gisbert R, Mar J, Puig-Junoy J (2010) A proposed guideline for economic evaluation of health technologies. Gac Sanit 24:154–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Health Information and Quality Authority (2010) Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies in Ireland. Health Information and Quality Authority, CorkGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Capri S, Ceci A, Terranova L, Merlo F, Mantovani L (2001) Guidelines for economics evaluations in Italy: recommendations from the Italian group of pharmacoeconomic stuides. Drug Inf J 35:189–201Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Sorenson C, Drummond M, Kanavos P (2008) Ensuring value for money in health care: the role of health technology assessment in the European Union. European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies. Observatory Studies Series No.11Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kanis JA, Jonsson B (2002) Economic evaluation of interventions for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:765–767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Cox DR, Oakes D (1984) Analysis of survival data. Monographs on statistics and applied probability 21. Chapman & Hall, LondonGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Oden A, Sykes D, Jonsson B (2005) Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the UK: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study. Osteoporos Int 16:15–25PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Black DM, Thompson DE, Bauer DC, Ensrud K, Musliner T, Hochberg MC, Nevitt MC, Suryawanshi S, Cummings SR (2000) Fracture risk reduction with alendronate in women with osteoporosis: the Fracture Intervention Trial. FIT Research Group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 85:4118–4124PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    EMEA (2009). Committe for medicinal products for human use—summary of positive opinion for Conbriza. EMEA, London, 19 February 2009Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Federaal Ministerie van Sociale Zaken, Volksgezondheid en Leefmilieu. Bestuur van de gezondheidszorgen. Commissie voor toezicht op en evaluatie van statistische gegevens die verband houden met de medische activiteiten in de ziekenhuizen. Rijksadministratif centrum. Brussel. Upon written requestGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Dodds MK, Codd MB, Looney A, Mulhall KJ (2009) Incidence of hip fracture in the Republic of Ireland and future projections: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 20:2105–2110. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0922-1 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kanis J (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, , UKGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    IARC (2008). GLOBOCAN 2008. Cancer incidence, mortality and prevalence worldwide in 2008. International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon. http://globocan.iarc.fr/
  40. 40.
    Wilmoth JR, Shkolnikov V (2012). The human mortality database (HMD). Online source http://www.mortality.org/
  41. 41.
    Oden A, Dawson A, Dere W, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (1998) Lifetime risk of hip fractures is underestimated. Osteoporos Int 8:599–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, de Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Poor G, Atkinson EJ, O'Fallon WM, Melton LJ III (1995) Determinants of reduced survival following hip fractures in men. Clin Orthop 319:260–265.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, de Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Excess mortality after hospitalisation for vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15:108–112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Parker MJ, Anand JK (1991) What is the true mortality of hip fractures? Public Health 105:443–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, de Laet C, Jonsson B, Oglesby AK (2003) The components of excess mortality after hip fracture. BONE 32:468–473PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Strom O, Borgstrom F, Sen SS, Boonen S, Haentjens P, Johnell O, Kanis JA (2007) Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries—an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial. Osteoporos Int 18:1047–1061PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Borgstrom F, Carlsson A, Sintonen H, Boonen S, Haentjens P, Burge R, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2006) The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis: an international perspective. Osteoporos Int 17:996–1007PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    NICE (2008) Osteoporosis—secondary prevention including strontium ranelate: appraisal consultation document. www.nice.org.uk
  50. 50.
    Kearon C (2003) Natural history of venous thromboembolism. Circulation 107:I22–I30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Azhar A, Lim C, Kelly E, O'Rourke K, Dudeney S, Hurson B, Quinlan W (2008) Cost induced by hip fractures. Ir Med J 101:213–215PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Bouee S, Lafuma A, Fagnani F, Meunier PJ, Reginster JY (2006) Estimation of direct unit costs associated with non-vertebral osteoporotic fractures in five European countries. Rheumatol Int 26: 1063–1072. doi.  10.1007/s00296-006-0180-x Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O, Hedbrandt J, Karlsson G (1996) Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis. Scand J Rheumatol Suppl 103:30–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kanis J (2001). Epidemiology and costs of fractures in the UK—background document for male osteoporosis model. Personal communication 2001Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Strom O, Kanis JA (2006) An economic evaluation of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporosis in a Swedish setting: based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS trials. Osteoporos Int 17:1781–1793PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Broekx S, Den HE, Torfs R, Remacle A, Mertens R, D'Hooghe T, Neven P, Christiaens MR, Simoens S (2011) The costs of breast cancer prior to and following diagnosis. Eur J Health Econ 12:311–317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    The World Bank (2010). Global purchasing power parities and real expenditures. The World Bank Database 2010. http://data.worldbank.org/. Accessed Dec 2011
  58. 58.
    Statistics Belgium (2012) www.statbel.fgov.be. Accessed Oct 2012
  59. 59.
    Stevenson M, Davis S (2006). Analyses of the cost-effectiveness of pooled alendronate and risedronate, compared with strontium ranelate, raloxifene, etidronate and teriparatide. NICE, LondonGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Brecht JG, Kruse HP, Mohrke W, Oestreich A, Huppertz E (2004) Health–economic comparison of three recommended drugs for the treatment of osteoporosis. Int J Clin Pharmacol Res 24:1–10PubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Visentin P, Ciravegna R, Fabris F (1997) Estimating the cost per avoided hip fracture by osteoporosis treatment in Italy. Maturitas 26:185–192. doi:S0378512296010997Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650. doi: 10.1007/s00198-010-1291-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Zethraeus N, Strom O, Borgstrom F (2006) What is the risk of institutionalization after hip fracture? Osteoporos Int 17(Suppl 1):57–58Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Gordois A, Posnett J, Borris L, Bossuyt P, Jonsson B, Levy E, de Pouvourville G (2003) The cost-effectiveness of fondaparinux compared with enoxaparin as prophylaxis against thromboembolism following major orthopedic surgery. J Thromb Haemost 1:2167–2174PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    The National Board of Health and Welfare in Sweden (2010). http://www.socialstyrelsen.se. Accessed Dec 2010
  66. 66.
    Gillespie P, O'Shea E, Murphy AW, Byrne MC, Byrne M, Smith SM, Cupples ME (2010) The cost-effectiveness of the SPHERE intervention for the secondary prevention of coronary heart disease. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 26:263–271PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Autier P, Haentjens P, Bentin J, Baillon JM, Grivegnee AR, Closon MC, Boonen S (2000) Costs induced by hip fractures: a prospective controlled study in Belgium. Belgian Hip Fracture Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11:373–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Kobelt G, Berg J, Lindgren P, Izquierdo G, Sanchez-Solino O, Perez-Miranda J, Casado MA (2006) Costs and quality of life of multiple sclerosis in Spain. Eur J Health Econ 7(Suppl 2):S65–S74. doi: 10.1007/s10198-006-0381-y PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Stadsledningskontoret. Stockholms stads budgetavräkning. 2003Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Burstrom K, Johannesson M, Diderichsen F (2001) Swedish population health-related quality of life results using the EQ-5D. Qual Life Res 10:621–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. Br Med J 316:736–741CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Foundation NO (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost-effective analysis. Osteoorosis Int 8:1–88Google Scholar
  73. 73.
    Sobocki P, Lekander I, Borgstrom F, Strom O, Runeson B (2007) The economic burden of depression in Sweden from 1997 to 2005. Eur Psychiatry 22:146–152PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Zethraeus N, Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Kanis J (2005) Reassessment of the cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy in Sweden: results based on the Women's Health Initiative randomized controlled trial. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 21:433–441PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Ström O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79:269–280. doi: 10.1080/17453670710015094 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, de Laet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg MA, La Croix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ III, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott AM, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts NB, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Borgstrom F, Strom O, Coelho J, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey EV, Kanis JA (2010) The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis using the FRAX. Osteoporos Int 21:495–505. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0989-8 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Borgstrom F, Strom O, Coelho J, Johansson H, Oden A, McCloskey E, Kanis JA (2010) The cost-effectiveness of strontium ranelate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 21:339–349. doi: 10.1007/s00198-009-0971-5 PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Ström O, Borgstrom F, Kleman M, McCloskey E, Odén A, Johansson H, Kanis J (2010). FRAX® and its applications in health economics. Cost-effectiveness and intervention thresholds. BONE 47:430–437Google Scholar
  80. 80.
    Hiligsmann M, Sedrine WB, Reginster JY (2012). Cost-effectiveness of bazedoxifene compared with raloxifene in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporotic women. J Bone Miner Res. doi:  10.1002/jbmr.1819
  81. 81.
    Darba J, Perez N, Kaskens L, Racketa J, Rejas J (2011). A cost-effectiveness model of bazedoxifene versus raloxifene for the prevention of fractures in Spanish postmenopausal women. European Congress on Osteoporosis and Osteoarthritis (ECCEO11-IOF) 2011, Valencia (Spain)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    van Staa TP, Leufkens HG, Abenhaim L, Zhang B, Cooper C (2000) Oral corticosteroids and fracture risk: relationship to daily and cumulative doses. Rheumatology (Oxford) 39:1383–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Kanis JA, Johansson H, Johnell O, Oden A, de Laet C, Eisman JA, Pols H, Tenenhouse A (2005) Alcohol intake as a risk factor for fracture. Osteoporos Int 16:737–742PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    National Services Scotland (2009). The patient journey post hip fracture: what constitutes rehabilitation?—A report from the Scottish hip fracture audit. Scottish Hip Fracture Audit 2009. http://www.shfa.scot.nhs.uk/
  85. 85.
    Barrett-Connor E, Mosca L, Collins P, Geiger MJ, Grady D, Kornitzer M, McNabb MA, Wenger NK (2006) Effects of raloxifene on cardiovascular events and breast cancer in postmenopausal women. N Engl J Med 355:125–137. doi:  10.1056/NEJMoa062462 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • K. Kim
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. Svedbom
    • 1
    • 2
  • X. Luo
    • 3
  • S. Sutradhar
    • 4
  • J. A. Kanis
    • 5
  1. 1.OptumInsightStockholmSweden
  2. 2.Unit of Dermatology; Department of MedicineKarolinska InstitutetSolnaSweden
  3. 3.Pfizer, Inc.GrotonUSA
  4. 4.PfizerNew YorkUSA
  5. 5.University of Sheffield Medical SchoolSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations