Does frailty predict increased risk of falls and fractures? A prospective population-based study
- 1.4k Downloads
A frailty concept that includes psychological and cognitive markers was prospectively shown to be associated with increased risk of multiple falls and fractures among 1,509 community dwelling older adults, especially in those aged 75 and over. The predictive ability of frailty is not superior to falls history.
The concept of frailty has been defined with or without psychological and cognitive markers. Falls are associated with multiple risk factors, including cognitive and mood disorders. The purpose of this study was to investigate the association of a comprehensive concept of frailty and its components with falls and fractures in community-dwelling older adults and to compare its predictive ability with having a history of falls.
One thousand five hundred nine participants in the Longitudinal Aging Study Amsterdam aged ≥65 were assessed to determine fall history and the prevalence of nine frailty markers, including cognitive and psychological factors. The number of falls and time to second fall were prospectively registered for 1 year. Fractures were registered for 6 years.
Frailty was significantly associated with time to second fall: hazard ratio of 1.53 [95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.07–2.18] and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.58 (CI, 0.53–0.62). In participants aged ≥75, frailty was associated with ≥2 falls: odds ratio (OR) of 1.74 (CI, 1.19–2.55) and AUC of 0.62 (CI, 0.55–0.68). Frailty, adjusted for age and sex, was significantly associated with ≥2 fractures: OR of 3.67 (CI, 1.47–9.15). The AUCs for falls history (aged ≥75) ranged from 0.62 (CI, 0.58–0.67) for ≥1 falls to 0.67 (CI, 0.59–0.74) for ≥3 falls.
A concept of frailty including psychological and cognitive markers is associated with both multiple falls and fractures. However, frailty is not superior to falls history for the selection of old persons at increased risk of recurrent falls.
KeywordsFalls Fractures Frailty Older adults
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve
95 % confidence interval
Conflicts of interest
- 10.Ensrud KE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, Fink HA, Cawthon PM, Stone KL, Hillier TA, Cauley JA, Hochberg MC, Rodondi N, Tracy JK, Cummings SR (2008) Comparison of 2 frailty indexes for prediction of falls, disability, fractures, and death in older women. Arch Intern Med 168:382–389PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Wolf SL, Barnhart HX, Kutner NG, McNeely E, Coogler C, Xu T (1996) Reducing frailty and falls in older persons: an investigation of Tai Chi and computerized balance training. Atlanta FICSIT group. Frailty and injuries: cooperative studies of intervention techniques. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:489–497PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 21.Kellogg International Work Group on the Prevention of Falls by the Elderly (1987) The prevention of falls in later life. Dan Med Bull 34(4):1–24Google Scholar
- 22.Kriegsman DM, Penninx BW, van Eijk JT, Boeke AJ, Deeg DJ (1996) Self-reports and general practitioner information on the presence of chronic diseases in community dwelling elderly. A study on the accuracy of patients' self-reports and on determinants of inaccuracy. J Clin Epidemiol 49:1407–1417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Avila-Funes JA, Amieva H, Barberger-Gateau P, Le GM, Raoux N, Ritchie K, Carriere I, Tavernier B, Tzourio C, Gutierrez-Robledo LM, Dartigues JF (2009) Cognitive impairment improves the predictive validity of the phenotype of frailty for adverse health outcomes: the three-city study. J Am Geriatr Soc 57:453–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar