Osteoporosis International

, Volume 24, Issue 5, pp 1599–1603 | Cite as

Continuous decline in incidence of hip fracture: nationwide statistics from Finland between 1970 and 2010

  • N. Korhonen
  • S. Niemi
  • J. Parkkari
  • H. Sievänen
  • M. Palvanen
  • P. Kannus
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

We determined the current trend in the number and incidence of hip fracture among persons 50 years of age or older in Finland between 1970 and 2010. After a clear rise until the late 1990s, the incidence of hip fracture has continuously declined.

Introduction

Hip fractures are a major public health issue associated with excess morbidity and mortality. We determined the current trend in the number and incidence (per 100,000 persons) of hip fracture among older adults in Finland, an EU country with a well-defined Caucasian population of 5.4 million people.

Methods

We took into account all persons 50 years of age or older who were admitted to hospitals for primary treatment of hip fracture between 1970 and 2010.

Results

The number of hip fractures rose sharply till the end of 1990s (from 1,857 in 1970 to 7,122 in 1997), but since then, the rise has leveled off (7,594 fractures in 2010). Similarly, the age-adjusted incidence of hip fracture increased until 1997 but declined thereafter. The decline was especially clear in women whose age-adjusted incidence was 515.7 (per 100,000 persons) in 1997 but only 382.6 in 2010. In men, the corresponding incidence was 245.3 in 1997 and 210.7 in 2010. The number of hip fractures will increase 1.8-fold by 2030 even with the current 2010 incidence rates because the size of the 50-year-old or older population is likely to increase sharply in the near future.

Conclusions

The declining trend in the incidence of hip fracture in Finland has continued through the entire first decade of the new millennium. Reasons for this development are uncertain, but possible explanations include increased average body weight, improved functional ability among elderly Finns, and specific measures to prevent bone loss and reduce the risk of falling.

Keywords

Elderly adults Epidemiology Hip fracture Incidence Time trends 

References

  1. 1.
    Kannus P, Parkkari J, Koskinen S, Niemi S, Palvanen M, Järvinen M, Vuori I (1999) Fall-induced injuries and deaths among older adults. JAMA 281:1895–1899PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tinetti ME, Speeecley M (1989) Prevention of falls among the elderly. N Engl J Med 320:1055–1059PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Korhonen N, Niemi S, Palvanen M, Parkkari J, Sievänen H, Kannus P (2012) Declining age-adjusted incidence of fall-induced injuries among elderly Finns. Age Ageing 41:75–79PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hartholt KA, Stevens JA, Polinder S, van der Cammen TJM, Patka P (2011) Increase in fall-related hospitalizations in the United States, 2001–2008. J Trauma 71:255–258PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Järvinen M (1999) Hip fractures in Finland between 1970 and 1997 and predictions for the future. Lancet 353:802–805PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hartholt K, Oudshoorn C, Zielinski S, Burgers P, Panneman M, van Beeck E, Patka P, van der Cammen T (2011) The epidemic of hip fractures: are we on the right track? PLoS One 7:e22227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kannus P, Niemi S, Parkkari J, Palvanen M, Vuori I, Järvinen M (2006) Nationwide decline in incidence of hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 21:1836–1838PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Keskimäki I, Aro S (1991) Accuracy of data on diagnosis, procedures and accidents in the Finnish hospital discharge register. Int J Health Sci 2:15–21Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sund R, Nurmi-Luthje I, Luthje P, Tanninen S, Narinen A, Keskimäki I (2007) Comparing properties of audit data and routinely collected register data in case of performance assessment of hip fracture treatment in Finland. Meth Inf Med 46:558–566Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mattila VM, Sillanpää P, Iivonen T, Parkkari J, Kannus P, Pihlajamäki H (2008) Coverage and accuracy of diagnosis of cruciate ligament injury in the Finnish National Hospital Discharge Register. Injury 39:1373–1376PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Official Statistics of Finland (2011) Structure of population and vital statistics: whole country and provinces, 1970–2010. Statistics Finland, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Støen R, Nordsletten L, Meyer H, Frihagen J, Falch J, Lofthus C (2012) Hip fracture incidence is decreasing in the high incidence area of Oslo, Norway. Osteoporosis Int. doi:10.1007/s00198-011-1888-3
  13. 13.
    Abrahamsen B, Vestergaard B (2010) Declining incidence of hip fractures and the extent use of anti-osteoporotic therapy in Denmark 1997–2006. Osteoporosis Int 21:373–380CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cassell E, Clapperton A. (2012) A decreasing trend in fall-related hip fracture incidence in Victoria, Australia. Osteoporosis Int, doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1937-6
  15. 15.
    Leslie W, O’Donnell S, Jean S, Lagacé C, Walsh P, Bancej C, Morin S, Hanley D, Papaioannou A (2009) Trends in hip fracture rates in Canada. JAMA 302:883–889PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Leslie W, Sadatsafavi M, Lix L, Azimaee M, Morin S, Metge C, Caetano P (2011) Secular decreases in fracture rates 1986–2006 for Manitoba, Canada: a population-based analysis. Osteoporosis Int 22:2137–2143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Stevens J, Rudd R (2010) Declining hip fracture rates in the United States. Age Ageing 39:500–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brauer C, Coca-Perraillon M, Cutler D, Rosen A (2009) Incidence and mortality of hip fractures in the United States. JAMA 302:1573–1579PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Brown C, Starr A, Nunley J (2012) Analysis of past secular trends of hip fracture and predicted number in the future 2010–2050. J Orthop Trauma 26:117–122PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Adams AL, Shi J, Takayanagi M, Dell RM, Funahashi TT, Jacobsen SJ. (2012) Ten-year hip fracture incidence rate trends in a large California population, 1997–2006. Osteoporosis Int, doi:10.1007/s00198-012-1938-5
  21. 21.
    Icks A, Haastert B, Wildner M, Becker C, Meyer G (2008) Trend of hip fracture incidence in Germany 1995–2004: a population based study. Osteoporosis Int 19:1139–1145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Cooper C, Cole Z, Holroyd C, Earl S, Harvey N, Dennison E, Melton L, Cummings S, Kanis J (2011) Secular trends in the incidence of hip and other osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis Int 22:1277–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Sulander T, Puska P, Nissinen A, Reunanen A, Uutela A. 75–84-vuotiaiden suomalaisten toiminnanvajauden muutokset 1993–2005 (Changes in the functional ability of elderly Finns in 1993–2005). Suomen Lääkärilehti 2007;62: 29–33 (in Finnish)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kannus P, Sievänen H, Palvanen M, Järvinen T, Parkkari J (2005) Prevention of falls and consequent injuries in elderly people. Lancet 336:1885–1893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gillespie LD, Robertson MC, Gillespie WJ, Lamb SE, Gates S, Cumming RG, Rowe BH. Interventions for preventing falls in older people living in the community. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;15:CD007146Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nordström P, Eklund F, Björnstig U, Nordström A, Lorentzon R, Sievänen H, Gustafson Y (2011) Do both areal BMD and injurious falls explain the higher incidence of fractures in women than in men? Calcif Tissue Int 89:203–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sennerby U, Melhus H, Gedeborg R, Byberg L, Garmo H, Ahlbom A, Pedersen NL, Michaëlsson K (2009) Cardiovascular diseases and risk of hip fracture. JAMA 302:1666–1673PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Laet C, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johanson H, Johnell O, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Kröger H, Fujiwara S, Garnero P, McCloskey EV, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ, Meunier PJ, Pols HAP, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Body mass index as a predictor of fracture risk: a meta-analysis. Osteoporosis Int 16:1130–1138Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Aromaa A, Koskinen S (2004) Health and functional capacity in Finland. Publications of the National Public Health Institute, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Helakorpi S, Holstila A-L, Virtanen S, Uutela A (2012) Health behavior and health among Finnish adult population, spring 2011. National Institute for Health and Welfare, Helsinki, Report 45/2012Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Helakorpi S, Prättälä R, Uutela A (2008) Health behaviour and health among the Finnish adult population, spring 2007. National Public Health Institute, Helsinki, Report B6/2008Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Karinkanta S, Piirtola M, Sievänen H, Uusi-Rasi K, Kannus P (2010) Physical therapy approaches to reduce risk of falls and fractures among older adults. Nat Rev Endocrinol 6:396–407PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Davies JC, Robertson MC, Ashe MC, Liu-Ambrose T, Khan KM, Marra CA (2010) Does a home-based strength and balance programme in people aged >80 years provide the best value for money to prevent falls? A systematic review of economic evaluations of falls prevention interventions. Brit J Sports Med 44:80–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. Korhonen
    • 1
    • 2
  • S. Niemi
    • 1
  • J. Parkkari
    • 3
  • H. Sievänen
    • 1
  • M. Palvanen
    • 1
  • P. Kannus
    • 1
    • 4
  1. 1.Injury and Osteoporosis Research CenterUKK Institute for Health Promotion ResearchTampereFinland
  2. 2.Medical School, University of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland
  3. 3.Tampere Research Center of Sports MedicineUKK Institute for Health Promotion ResearchTampereFinland
  4. 4.Division of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Department of Trauma, Musculoskeletal Surgery and Rehabilitation, Tampere University HospitalUniversity of Tampere Medical SchoolTampereFinland

Personalised recommendations