Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 24, Issue 1, pp 77–85 | Cite as

Trabecular bone score improves fracture risk prediction in non-osteoporotic women: the OFELY study

  • S. Boutroy
  • D. Hans
  • E. Sornay-Rendu
  • N. Vilayphiou
  • R. Winzenrieth
  • R. Chapurlat
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The use of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) for fracture prediction may be enhanced by considering bone microarchitectural deterioration. Trabecular bone score (TBS) helped in redefining a significant subset of non-osteoporotic women as a higher risk group.

Introduction

TBS is an index of bone microarchitecture. Our goal was to assess the ability of TBS to predict incident fracture.

Methods

TBS was assessed in 560 postmenopausal women from the Os des Femmes de Lyon cohort, who had a lumbar spine (LS) DXA scan (QDR 4500A, Hologic) between years 2000 and 2001. During a mean follow-up of 7.8 ± 1.3 years, 94 women sustained 112 fragility fractures.

Results

At the time of baseline DXA scan, women with incident fracture were significantly older (70 ± 9 vs. 65 ± 8 years) and had a lower LS_aBMD and LS_TBS (both −0.4SD, p < 0.001) than women without fracture. The magnitude of fracture prediction was similar for LS_aBMD and LS_TBS (odds ratio [95 % confidence interval] = 1.4 [1.2;1.7] and 1.6 [1.2;2.0]). After adjustment for age and prevalent fracture, LS_TBS remained predictive of an increased risk of fracture. Yet, its addition to age, prevalent fracture, and LS_aBMD did not reach the level of significance to improve the fracture prediction. When using the WHO classification, 39 % of fractures occurred in osteoporotic women, 46 % in osteopenic women, and 15 % in women with T-score > −1. Thirty-seven percent of fractures occurred in the lowest quartile of LS_TBS, regardless of BMD. Moreover, 35 % of fractures that occurred in osteopenic women were classified below this LS_TBS threshold.

Conclusion

In conclusion, LS_aBMD and LS_TBS predicted fractures equally well. In our cohort, the addition of LS_TBS to age and LS_aBMD added only limited information on fracture risk prediction. However, using the lowest quartile of LS_TBS helped in redefining a significant subset of non-osteoporotic women as a higher risk group which is important for patient management.

Keywords

Bone mineral density Fracture risk Osteoporosis Postmenopausal women Trabecular bone score 

Notes

Conflicts of interest

TBS iNsight Software is a product of Med-Imaps. Didier Hans is a co-owner of the TBS patent and has corresponding ownership shares. Renaud Winzenrieth is a scientific consultant for Med-Imaps. All the other authors state that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. 1.
    Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. BMJ 312:1254–1259PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288:1889–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nguyen TV, Center JR, Sambrook PN, Eisman JA (2001) Risk factors for proximal humerus, forearm, and wrist fractures in elderly men and women: the Dubbo Osteoporosis Epidemiology Study. Am J Epidemiol 153:587–595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Schuit SC, van der Klift M, Weel AE, de Laet CE, Burger H, Seeman E, Hofman A, Uitterlinden AG, van Leeuwen JP, Pols HA (2004) Fracture incidence and association with bone mineral density in elderly men and women: the Rotterdam Study. Bone 34:195–202PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Garnero P, Duboeuf F, Delmas PD (2005) Identification of osteopenic women at high risk of fracture: the OFELY study. J Bone Miner Res 20:1813–1819PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE, Berger ML (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164:1108–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    NIH Consensus Development Panel (2000) Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, and therapy. NIH Consens Statement 17:1–45Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Seeman E, Delmas PD (2006) Bone quality—the material and structural basis of bone strength and fragility. N Engl J Med 354:2250–2261PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chappard D, Guggenbuhl P, Legrand E, Basle MF, Audran M (2005) Texture analysis of X-ray radiographs is correlated with bone histomorphometry. J Bone Miner Metab 23:24–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pothuaud L, Barthe N, Krieg MA, Mehsen N, Carceller P, Hans D (2009) Evaluation of the potential use of trabecular bone score to complement bone mineral density in the diagnosis of osteoporosis: a preliminary spine BMD-matched, case–control study. J Clin Densitom 12:170–176PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pothuaud L, Carceller P, Hans D (2008) Correlations between grey-level variations in 2D projection images (TBS) and 3D microarchitecture: applications in the study of human trabecular bone microarchitecture. Bone 42:775–787PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Winzenrieth R, Michelet F, Hans D (2012) 3D microarchitecture correlations with 2D projection image grey level variations assessed by TBS using high resolution CT acquisitions: effects of resolution and noise. J Clin Densitom. doi: 10.1016/j.jocd.2012.05.001
  13. 13.
    Hans D, Barthe N, Boutroy S, Pothuaud L, Winzenrieth R, Krieg MA (2011) Correlations between trabecular bone score, measured using anteroposterior dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry acquisition, and 3-dimensional parameters of bone microarchitecture: an experimental study on human cadaver vertebrae. J Clin Densitom 14:302–312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rabier B, Heraud A, Grand-Lenoir C, Winzenrieth R, Hans D (2010) A multicentre, retrospective case–control study assessing the role of trabecular bone score (TBS) in menopausal Caucasian women with low areal bone mineral density (BMDa): analysing the odds of vertebral fracture. Bone 46:176–181PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Winzenrieth R, Dufour R, Pothuaud L, Hans D (2010) A retrospective case–control study assessing the role of trabecular bone score in postmenopausal Caucasian women with osteopenia: analyzing the odds of vertebral fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 86:104–109PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hans D, Goertzen AL, Krieg MA, Leslie WD (2011) Bone microarchitecture assessed by TBS predicts osteoporotic fractures independent of bone density: the Manitoba study. J Bone Miner Res 26:2762–2769PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arlot ME, Sornay-Rendu E, Garnero P, Vey-Marty B, Delmas PD (1997) Apparent pre- and postmenopausal bone loss evaluated by DXA at different skeletal sites in women: the OFELY cohort. J Bone Miner Res 12:683–690PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–1148PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wegrzyn J, Roux JP, Arlot ME, Boutroy S, Vilayphiou N, Guyen O, Delmas PD, Chapurlat R, Bouxsein ML (2010) Role of trabecular microarchitecture and its heterogeneity parameters in the mechanical behavior of ex vivo human L3 vertebrae. J Bone Miner Res 25:2324–2331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Del Rio LM, Winzenrieth R, Cormier C, Di Gregorio S (2012) Is bone microarchitecture status of the lumbar spine assessed by TBS related to femoral neck fracture? A Spanish case–control study. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-012-2008-8
  21. 21.
    Krueger D, Fidler E, Libber J, Aubry-Rosier B, Hans D, Binkley N (2012) Spine trabecular bone score (TBS) subsequent to BMD improves vertebral and op fracture discrimination in women. Osteoporos Int 23(Suppl 2):S336Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Roux JP, Wegrzyn J, Boutroy S, Hans D, Chapurlat RD (2012) Relationship between trabecular bone score (TBS), bone mass and microarchitecture in human vertebrae: an ex vivo study. Osteoporos Int 23(Suppl 2):S327Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vasic J, Gojkovic F, Petranova T, Elez J, Culafic Vojinovic V, Winzenrieth R, Hans D, Rashkov R, Dimic A (2012) Spine micro-architecture estimation (TBS) discriminates major osteoporotic fracture from controls equally well than site matched BMD and independently: the eastern europe TBS study. Osteoporos Int 23(Suppl 2):S337Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Popp AW, Meer S, Krieg MA, Perrelet R, Hans D, Lippuner K (2012) Bone mineral density (BMD) combined with micro-architecture parameters (TBS) significantly improves the indentification of women at high risk of fracture: the SEMOF cohort study. Osteoporos Int 23(Suppl 2):S327Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Dufour R, Heraud A (2009) Lumbar spine micro-architecture in french women derived from DXA: TBS normative data. J Clin Densitom 12:377–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bloch JG, Hans D, Diebolt V, Kieffer D, Krieg MA (2008) Evaluation du risque fracturaire dans la zone d’ostéopénie: utilisation clinique d’un indice de la microarchitecture osseuse (TBS: trabéculométrie et trabéculographie). In: Proceedings of the SFR annual meeting, Paris, 14–17 Dec 2008Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Lamy O, Metzger M, Krieg MA, Aubry-Rozier B, Stoll D, Hans D (2011) OsteoLaus: prediction of osteoporotic fractures by clinical risk factors and DXA, IVA and TBS. Rev Med Suisse 7:2130, 2132–2134, 2136Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albrand G, Munoz F, Sornay-Rendu E, DuBoeuf F, Delmas PD (2003) Independent predictors of all osteoporosis-related fractures in healthy postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Bone 32:78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sornay-Rendu E, Munoz F, Delmas PD, Chapurlat RD (2010) The FRAX tool in French women: how well does it describe the real incidence of fracture in the OFELY cohort? J Bone Miner Res 25:2101–2107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Winzenrieth R, Dufour R, Popova Y, Hans D (2010) Spine osteo-arthrosis has no effect on TBS assessment: a site matched study with BMD. J Clin Densitom 13:130–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Boutroy
    • 1
  • D. Hans
    • 2
  • E. Sornay-Rendu
    • 1
  • N. Vilayphiou
    • 1
  • R. Winzenrieth
    • 2
  • R. Chapurlat
    • 1
  1. 1.INSERM Unit 1033, Hôpital E. Herriot—Pavillon FUniversité de LyonLyon cedex 03France
  2. 2.Bone Diseases CenterLausanne University HospitalLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations