Vertebral body bone strength: the contribution of individual trabecular element morphology
- 342 Downloads
Although the amount of bone explains the largest amount of variability in bone strength, there is still a significant proportion unaccounted for. The morphology of individual bone trabeculae explains a further proportion of the variability in bone strength and bone elements that contribute to bone strength depending on the direction of loading.
Micro-CT imaging enables measurement of bone microarchitecture and subsequently mechanical strength of the same sample. It is possible using micro-CT data to perform morphometric analysis on individual rod and plate bone trabeculae using a volumetric spatial decomposition algorithm and hence determine their contribution to bone strength.
Twelve pairs of vertebral bodies (T12/L1 or L4/L5) were harvested from human cadavers, and bone cubes (10 × 10 × 10 mm) were obtained. After micro-CT imaging, a volumetric spatial decomposition algorithm was applied, and measures of individual trabecular elements were obtained. Bone strength was measured in compression, where one bone specimen from each vertebral segment was tested supero-inferiorly (SI) and the paired specimen was tested antero-posteriorly (AP).
Bone volume fraction was the strongest individual determinant of SI strength (r 2 = 0.77, p < 0.0001) and AP (r 2 = 0.54, p < 0.0001). The determination of SI strength was improved to r 2 = 0.87 with the addition of mean rod length and relative plate bone volume fraction. The determination of AP strength was improved to r 2 = 0.85 with the addition of mean rod volume and relative rod bone volume fraction.
Microarchitectural measures of individual trabeculae that contribute to bone strength have been identified. In addition to the contribution of BV/TV, trabecular rod morphology increased the determination of AP strength by 57%, whereas measures of trabecular plate and rod morphology increased determination of SI strength by 13%. Decomposing vertebral body bone architecture into its constituent morphological elements shows that trabecular element morphology has specific functional roles to assist in maintaining skeletal integrity.
KeywordsAnisotropy Bone strength Spatial decomposition Trabecular bone plates Trabecular bone rods
The authors are grateful to the staff at the Royal Adelaide Hospital Mortuary for their assistance with the collection of spines at autopsy. This work was supported by funding from the National Health and Medical Research Council, Australia. Dr. Badiei was supported by an Australian Postgraduate Award and the Discipline of Anatomy and Pathology, University of Adelaide.
Conflicts of interest
- 2.Anonymous (2001) The burden of brittle bones. In: Access economics, Canberra, ACTGoogle Scholar
- 20.Baum T, Carballido-Gamio J, Huber MB, Muller D, Monetti R, Rath C, Eckstein F, Lochmuller EM, Majumdar S, Rummeny EJ, Link TM, Bauer JS (2010) Automated 3D trabecular bone structure analysis of the proximal femur—prediction of biomechanical strength by CT and DXA. Osteoporos Int 21:1553–1564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 26.Currey JD (2002) Euler buckling. In: Currey JD (ed) Bone: structure and mechanics. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 231–236Google Scholar
- 31.Liu XS, Zhang XH, Sajda P, Saha PK, Wehrli FW, Guo XE (2007) Contributions of trabecular rods of various orientations in determining the elastic properties of human vertebral trabecular bone. In: ASME Summer bioengineering conference. Keystone, Colorado, pp SBC2007-176408Google Scholar
- 34.Cox LGE, Van Rietbergen B, van Donkelaar CC, Ito K (2010) Analysis of bone architecture sensitivity for changes in mechanical loading, cellular activity, mechanotransduction, and tissue properties. Biomech Model Mechanobiol. doi: 10.1007/s10237-010-0267-x