Cost-effectiveness of Denosumab for the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis
- 1.1k Downloads
Denosumab is an injectable drug that reduces the risk of fractures. The objective was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab in a Swedish setting, also accounting for poor adherence to treatment. Denosumab is cost-effective, particularly for patients at high risk of fracture and low adherence to oral treatments.
Denosumab is a novel biologic agent developed for the treatment of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures that has been shown to reduce the risk of fractures in a phase III trial. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab from a societal perspective compared with generic alendronate, branded risedronate, strontium ranelate, and no treatment in a Swedish setting.
A Markov cohort model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness of denosumab given for up to 5 years to a typical Swedish patient population (women aged 71 years, T-score ≤ −2.5 SD and a prevalence of morphometric vertebral fractures of 34%). The model included treatment persistence and residual effect after discontinuation assumed to be equal to the time on treatment. Persistence with the comparator treatments and with denosumab was derived from prescription data and a persistence study, respectively.
The base-case incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were estimated at €27,000, €12,000, €5,000, and €14,000, for denosumab compared with generic alendronate, risedronate, strontium ranelate, and no treatment, respectively. Sub-optimal persistence had the greatest impact in the comparison with generic alendronate, where the difference in drug cost was large.
Improving persistence with osteoporosis treatment impacts positively on cost-effectiveness with a larger number of fractures avoided in the population targeted for treatment. Denosumab is a cost-effective alternative to oral osteoporosis treatments, particularly for patients at high risk of fracture and low expected adherence to oral treatments.
KeywordsAdherence Compliance Fracture Model Persistence Sweden
The authors would like to acknowledge Amgen Inc. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA for funding model development and Steering Committee meetings. The authors are also grateful to Enkhe Badamgarav and David Macarios of Amgen Inc. and Deborah Marshall of the University of Calgary for their assistance in framing the research questions, aid in model development, and participation in the Steering Committee. The authors also sincerely appreciate the tremendous logistical and planning support provided by Dominika Dabrowski of i3 Innovus.
Conflicts of interest
Sponsored by Amgen.
- 3.Murthy RK, Morrow PK, Theriault RL (2009) Bone biology and the role of the RANK ligand pathway. Oncology (Williston Park) 23:9–15Google Scholar
- 4.Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C (2009) Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 361:756–765CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 6.Papaioannou A, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD, Sebaldt RJ, Ferko N, Puglia M, Brown J, Tenenhouse A, Olszynski WP, Boulos P, Hanley DA, Josse R, Murray TM, Petrie A, Goldsmith CH (2003) Adherence to bisphosphonates and hormone replacement therapy in a tertiary care setting of patients in the CANDOO database. Osteoporos Int 14:808–813CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Landfeldt E, Borgström F, Robbins S, Ström O (2009) A retrospective cohort study of medication adherence to treatment of osteoporosis in a Swedish population. Oral presentation, ISPOR, ParisGoogle Scholar
- 12.Kanis J (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report, p61, WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
- 13.Medical products agency (2007) Behandling av osteoporos. www.mpa.se
- 15.Hasserius R, Karlsson MK, Nilsson BE, Redlund-Johnell I, Johnell O (2003) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict increased mortality and increased fracture rate in both men and women: a 10-year population-based study of 598 individuals from the Swedish cohort in the European Vertebral Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporos Int 14:61–68CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.NICE (2008) Systematic reviews of clinical effectiveness prepared for the guideline Osteoporosis: “Assessment of fracture risk and the prevention of osteoporotic fractures in individuals at high risk”. (http://wwwniceorguk/guidance/indexjsp?action=byID&o=11621)
- 17.Jones ML, Wilkinson A (2006) Adverse effects and persistence with therapy in patients taking oral alendronate, etidronate or residronate: systematic reviews (NICE). The University of Sheffield, School of Health and Related Research (http://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/index.jsp?action=download&o=36718)
- 18.Stevenson M, Davis S (2006) DSU economic evaluation of pooled alendronate and risedronate compared with strontium ranelate, raloxifene, etidronate and teriparatide. National Institute of Clinical Exelence (NICE), http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=370643. Accessed 13 May 2009
- 21.McClung M, Freemantle N, Kendler D, Lillestol M, Moffett A, Satram-Hoang S, Yang Y, Kaur P, Macarios D, Siddhanti S (2010) Open-label study to evaluate the adherence, preference, and satisfaction of denosumab and alendronate in postmenopausal women. S 386 Osteoporos Int 21:[Suppl1]S25-S388 1 C P899Google Scholar
- 24.De Laet CE, van Hout BA, Burger H, Hofman A, Pols HA (1997) Bone density and risk of hip fracture in men and women: cross sectional analysis. Br Med J 315:221–225Google Scholar
- 25.Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O'Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 27.Average Exchange Rates. http://www.riksbank.com Accessed 18 October 2009
- 28.Dental and Pharmaceutical Benefits Agency (2003) General guidelines for economic evaluations from the Pharmaceutical Benefits Board. www.tlv.se
- 34.Ekman M (2002) Consumption and production by age in Sweden: Basic facts and health economic implications. http://www.tlv.se/Upload/Foretag/FOR-040506-tabell-lakemedel.pdf, Accessed 2009-12-11
- 35.Johanesson M, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Kobelt G, Zethraeus N (2009) Why should economic evaluations of medical innovations have a societal perspective? Office of healt economics (OHE) No. 51 OctoberGoogle Scholar
- 38.Statistics Sweden http://www.ssd.scb.se/databaser/makro/Produkt.asp?produktid=BE0101, Accessed 2010-03-16
- 39.The National Board of Health and Welfare. National Patient Register (NPC) and Cause of Death Register (CDR). http://www.sos.se/epc/epceng.htm
- 40.Ioannidis G, Papaioannou A, Hopman WM, Akhtar-Danesh N, Anastassiades T, Pickard L, Kennedy CC, Prior JC, Olszynski WP, Davison KS, Goltzman D, Thabane L, Gafni A, Papadimitropoulos EA, Brown JP, Josse RG, Hanley DA, Adachi JD (2009) Relation between fractures and mortality: results from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Cmaj 181:265–271PubMedGoogle Scholar
- 47.Cummings SR, Black DM, Thompson DE, Applegate WB, Barrett-Connor E, Musliner TA, Palermo L, Prineas R, Rubin SM, Scott JC, Vogt T, Wallace R, Yates AJ, LaCroix AZ (1998) Effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with low bone density but without vertebral fractures: results from the Fracture Intervention Trial. Jama 280:2077–2082CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 48.Black DM, Cummings SR, Karpf DB, Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Nevitt MC, Bauer DC, Genant HK, Haskell WL, Marcus R, Ott SM, Torner JC, Quandt SA, Reiss TF, Ensrud KE (1996) Randomised trial of effect of alendronate on risk of fracture in women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Lancet 348:1535–1541CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Oden A, Vasireddy S, Kayan K, Pande K, Jalava T, Kanis JA (2009) Ten-year fracture probability identifies women who will benefit from clodronate therapy–additional results from a double-blind, placebo-controlled randomised study. Osteoporos Int 20:811–817CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 52.Vägverket (1997) Vägverkets samhällsekonomiska kalkymodell. Ekonomisk teori och värderingar. In Authority VSR (ed). StockholmGoogle Scholar
- 54.Tosteson AN, Do TP, Wade SW, Anthony MS, Downs RW (2010) Persistence and switching patterns among women with varied osteoporosis medication histories: 12-month results from POSSIBLE US. Osteoporos Int (E-pub ahead of print)Google Scholar
- 55.Kanis JA, Stevenson M, McCloskey EV, Davis S, Lloyd-Jones M (2007) Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 11:1–256Google Scholar
- 56.Stevenson M, Davies S (2006) DSU economic evaluation of pooled alendronate and risedronate compared with strontium ranelate, raloxifene, etidronate and teriparatide(http://guidance.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=370643)
- 57.Ström O, Landfeldt E, Robbins S, Borgström F (2010) Adherence to treatment of osteoporosis and fracture risk: The Swedish Adherence Register Analysis (SARA). Oral presentation/poster ECCEO/IOF, FlorenceGoogle Scholar
- 59.McCloskey E, De Takats D, Orgee J, Aropinn S, Jalava T, Cliffe J, Reaney L, McGurk C, Charlesworth DJAK (2005) Characteristics associated with non-persistence during daily therapy. Experience from the placebo wing of a community based clinical trial. J Bone Miner Res 20(suppl 1):S282Google Scholar
- 63.WHO (1998) Guidelines for preclinical evaluation and clinical trials in osteoporosis. Geneve. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/1998/9241545224_eng.pdf, Accessed
- 65.Greendale GA, Espeland M, Slone S, Marcus R, Barrett-Connor E (2002) Bone mass response to discontinuation of long-term hormone replacement therapy: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) Safety Follow-up Study. Arch Intern Med 162:665–672CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 66.Bagger YZ, Tanko LB, Alexandersen P, Hansen HB, Mollgaard A, Ravn P, Qvist P, Kanis JA, Christiansen C (2004) Two to three years of hormone replacement treatment in healthy women have long-term preventive effects on bone mass and osteoporotic fractures: the PERF study. Bone 34:728–735CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 70.Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR (2006) Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. Jama 296:2927–2938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 75.NICE (2008) Osteoporosis—secondary prevention including strontium ranelate: Appraisal consultation document. www.nice.org.uk