Osteoporosis International

, Volume 21, Issue 10, pp 1637–1656 | Cite as

A systematic review of interventions by healthcare professionals on community-dwelling postmenopausal women with osteoporosis

  • P. Lai
  • S. S. Chua
  • S. P. Chan



A systematic review was conducted to evaluate evidence concerning the effect of non-drug interventions by healthcare professionals on community-dwelling postmenopausal osteoporotic women. Evidence available indicates that such interventions are effective in improving the quality of life, medication compliance, and calcium intake, but effect on other outcomes is less conclusive.


The purpose of this study is to conduct a systematic review to evaluate evidence concerning the effect of non-drug interventions by healthcare professionals on community-dwelling postmenopausal osteoporotic women.


Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between year 1990 and 2009 were identified. Types of patient outcome used as assessment included quality of life (QOL), bone mineral density (BMD), medication compliance and persistence, knowledge level, and lifestyle modification.


Twenty four RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Seven studies assessed interventions by physiotherapists, six by physicians, seven by nurses, three by multi-disciplinary teams and one by dietitians. Variability in the types and intensity of interventions made comparison between each study difficult. Collectively, these studies provided some evidence to show that interventions by healthcare professionals improved the QOL medication compliance and calcium intake of patients but its effects on BMD, medication persistence, knowledge, and other lifestyle modifications were less conclusive.


From this review, it was found that some outcome measures of such non-drug interventions still required further studies. Future studies should use validated instruments to assess the outcomes, with focus on common definitions of interventions and outcome measures, more intensive one-to-one interventions, appropriate control groups, adequate randomization procedures, and also provide information on effect size.


Community-dwelling Healthcare professionals Interventions Postmenopausal Systematic review 


Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Cooper C, Campion G, Melton Lr (1992) Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 2:285–289CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Burge R, Dawson-Hughes B, Solomon DH et al (2007) Incidence and economic burden of osteoporosis-related fractures in the United States, 2005-2025. J Bone Miner Res 22:465–475CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic LA, O'Brien MD et al (2007) The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention. Osteoporos Int 18:159–166CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chang JT, Morton SM, Rubenstein LZ et al (2004) Interventions for the prevention of falls in older adults: systematic review and meta analysis of randomized controlled trials. BMJ 328:680CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gates S, Lamb SE, Fisher JD et al (2008) Multifactorial assessment and targeted intervention for preventing falls and injuries among older people in community and emergency care settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 336:130–133CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (2008) "Section 6: Systematic literature review. Accessed 3 Oct 2008
  7. 7.
    Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. (2001). "Outcomes research: Fact sheet." Accessed 3 Oct 2008
  8. 8.
    University of Colorado. (2000). "Effect size." 31 July 2009
  9. 9.
    Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates, HillsdaleGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sedlak CA, Doheny MO, Estok PJ et al (2005) Tailored interventions to enhance osteoporosis prevention in women. Orthop Nurs 24:270–276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rolnick SJ, Kopher R, Jackson J et al (2001) What is the impact of osteoporosis education and bone mineral density testing for postmenopausal women in a managed care setting? Menopause 8:141–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Clowes JA, Peel NF, Eastell R (2004) The impact of monitoring on adherence and persistence with antiresorptive treatment for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:1117–1123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Schousboe JT, DeBold RC, Kuno LS et al (2005) Education and phone follow-up in postmenopausal women at risk for osteoporosis—effects on calcium intake, exercise frequency, and medication use. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 13:395–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Binder EF, Brown M, Sinacore DR et al (2004) Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 292:837–846CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Estok PJ, Sedlak CA, Doheny MO et al (2007) Structural model for osteoporosis preventing behavior in postmenopausal women. Nurs Res 56:148–158CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA et al (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178:569–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Majumdar SR, Beaupre LA, Harley CH et al (2007) Use of a case manager to improve osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture—results of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Intern Med 167:2110–2115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Carter ND, Khan KM, Petit MA et al (2001) Results of a 10-week community based strength and balance training programme to reduce fall risk factors: a randomised controlled trial in 65-75 year old women with osteoporosis. Br J Sports Med 35:348–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cranney A, Lam A, Ruhland L et al (2008) A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial. Osteoporos Int. doi: 10.1007/s00198-00008-00669-00190 Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Papaioannou A, Adachi JD, Winegard K et al (2003) Efficacy of home-based exercise for improving quality of life among elderly women with symptomatic osteoporosis-related vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int 14:677–682CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bravo G, Gauthier P, Roy PM et al (1996) Impact of a 12-month exercise program on the physical and psychological health of osteopenic women. J Am Geriatr Soc 44:756–762PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    van Haastregt JCM, Diederiks JPM, van Rossum E et al (2000) Effects of a programme of multifactorial home visits on falls and mobility impairments in elderly people at risk: randomised controlled trial. BMJ 321:994–998CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Malmros B, Mortensen L, Jensen MB et al (1998) Positive effects of physiotherapy on chronic pain and performance in osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 8:215–221CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Delmas PD, Vrijens B, Eastell R et al (2007) Effect of monitoring bone turnover markers on persistence with risedronate treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 92:1296–1304CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Alp A, Kanat E, Yurtkuran M (2007) Efficacy of a self-management program for osteoporotic subjects. Am J Phy Med Rehab 86:633–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Nielsen D, Ryg J, Nissen N et al (2008) Multidisciplinary patient education in groups increases knowledge on osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Scand J Public Health 36:346–352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Guilera M, Fuentes M, Grifols M et al (2006) Does an educational leaflet improve self-reported adherence to therapy in osteoporosis? The OPTIMA study. Osteoporos Int 17:664–671CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Preisinger E, Alacamlioglu Y, Pils K et al (1996) Exercise therapy for osteoporosis: results of a randomised controlled trial. Br J Sports Med 30:209–212CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Elley CR, Robertson MC, Garrett S et al (2008) Effectiveness of a falls-and-fracture nurse coordinator to reduce falls: a randomized, controlled trial of at-risk older adults. JAGS 56:1383–1389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hongo M, Itoi E, Sinaki M et al (2007) Effect of low-intensity back exercise on quality of life and back extensor strength in patients with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Osteoporos Int 18:1389–1395CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Tsauo JY, Leu WS, Chen YT et al (2005) Effects on function and quality of life of postoperative home-based physical therapy for patients with hip fracture. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 86:1953–1957CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Chan KM, Qin L, Lau MC et al (2004) A randomized, prospective study of the effects of Tai Chi Chun exercise on bone mineral density in postmenopausal women. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 85:717–722CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Hien VT, Khan NC, le Mai B et al (2009) Effect of community-based nutrition education intervention on calcium intake and bone mass in postmenopausal Vietnamese women. Public Health Nutr 12:674–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Hien VT, Khan NC, le Mai B et al (2008) Effect of community-based nutrition education intervention on calcium intake and bone mass in postmenopausal Vietnamese women. Public Health Nutr 12:674–679CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Roughead EE, Semple SJ, Vitry AI (2005) Pharmaceutical care services: a systematic review of published studies, 1990 to 2003, examining effectiveness in improving patient outcomes. Int J Pharm Prac 13:53–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carter ND, Khan KM, McKay HA et al (2002) Community-based exercise program reduces risk factors for falls in 65 to 75-year-old women with osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 167:997–1004PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Ryg J, Nissen N, Nielsen D et al (2005) Patients' and population's knowledge of osteoporosis (article in Danish). Ugeskr Laeger 167:282–285PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Kim KK, Horan ML, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis knowledge tests, osteoporosis health belief scale, and osteoporosis self-efficacy scale. Grand Valley State University, AllendaleGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Pande KC, Takats D, Kanis J et al (2000) Development of a questionnaire (OPQ) to assess patient’s knowledge about osteoporosis. Maturitas 237:75–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Ailinger RL, Harper DC, Lasus HA (1998) Bone up on osteoporosis. Development of the facts on Osteoporosis Quiz. Orthop Nurs 17:66–73CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nelson HD, Helfand M, Woolf SH et al (2002) Screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: a review of the evidence for the US Preventive Services task force. Ann Intern Med 137:529–541PubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Koval PG, Easterling L, Pettus D et al (2005) How should a DEXA scan be used to evaluate bisphosphonate therapy for osteoporosis? J Fam Pract 54(65):69–71Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Mazees R, Chestnut CHr, McClung M et al (1992) Enhanced precision with dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Calcif Tissue Int 51:14–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Lenchik L, Kiebzak GM, Blunt BA (2002) International Society for Clinical Densitometry Position Development Panel and Scientific Advisory Committee. What is the role of serial bone mineral density measurements in patient management? J Clin Densitom 5(Suppl):S29–S38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry scientific review. JAMA 288:1889–1897, Erratum in: JAMA 2002; 1288:2825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    National Osteoporosis Foundation (2003) Physician's guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. 24 Aug 2009
  47. 47.
    Trimpou P, Bosaeus I, Bengtsson BA et al (2009) High correlation between quantitative ultrasound and DXA during 7 years of follow-up. Eur J Radiol. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2008.11.024
  48. 48.
    Weinstein RS, New KD, Sappington LJ (1991) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry versus single photon absorptiometry of the radius. J Calcif Tissue Int 49:313–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Rosenthal DL, Mayo-Smith W, Hayes C et al (1989) Age and bone mass in premenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 4:533–538CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Faulkner K (1995) Measurement of axial and peripheral bone mass by QCY. Bone mass measurement in osteoporosis and other bone diseases. 14 Aug 2009
  51. 51.
    Davidson M (2003) Pharmacotherapeutics for osteoporosis prevention and treatment. J Midwifery Womens Health 48:39–54CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Sheikh I, Ogden J (1998) The role of knowledge and beliefs in help seeking behaviour for cancer: a quantitative and qualitative approach. Pat Educ Counsel 35:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Gupta A, Thomas P (2002) Knowledge of stroke symptoms and risk factors among at-risk elderly patients in the UK. Int J Clin Pract 56:634–637PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Werner P (2003) Knowledge about symptoms of Alzheimer's disease: correlates and relationship to help-seeking behaviour. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 18:1029–1036CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Nichols-English G, Provost M, Koompalum D et al (2002) Strategies for pharmacists in the implementation of diabetes mellitus management programs: new roles in primary and collaborative care. Dis Manage Health Outcomes 10:783–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pharmacy DepartmentUniversity of Malaya and University Malaya Medical CentreKuala LumpurMalaysia
  2. 2.Pharmacy DepartmentUniversity of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia
  3. 3.Department of Medicine (Endocrinology Unit)University of MalayaKuala LumpurMalaysia

Personalised recommendations