Factors affecting short-term precision of musculoskeletal measures using peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT)
- 204 Downloads
Few studies have investigated factors influencing the precision of peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) measures. This study found time between repeat scans and subject anthropometric characteristics to influence short-term precision of pQCT-derived measures in the lower leg. These findings have implications for both investigators and clinicians utilizing pQCT outcomes.
Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) is increasingly being used to investigate musculoskeletal changes associated with age, disease and/or intervention. Precision of pQCT measures is of paramount importance in this endeavor. This study aimed to establish the short-term precision of pQCT-derived musculoskeletal measures of the lower leg and investigate factors influencing this precision.
Thirty healthy subjects had a series of six pQCT scans of the lower leg (66% of tibial length proximal from its distal end) performed on two separate days by two different testers. The influences of different testers, time between repeat scans, and subject anthropometric characteristics on precision were explored.
Overall precision error (root mean square) increased from bone (<1%) to muscle (<1.5%) to fat (3%). The two testers were equally precise in performing pQCT measures; however, precision error increased when repeat scans were repeated 1 week apart as opposed to on the same day. Subject anthropometric characteristics influenced precision errors with the general finding being that an increase in subject size was associated with less precise pQCT measures.
pQCT is a relatively precise technique for the assessment of bone and muscle, but precision is influenced by time between repeat scans and subject anthropometric characteristics. Investigators and clinicians need to be aware of these factors influencing pQCT outcomes as they may influence statistical power in clinical studies and the characterization of change in individual patients.
KeywordsOsteoporosis Peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) Precision Reproducibility Sarcopenia Tibia
Conflicts of interest
- 3.Sehl ME, Yates FE (2001) Kinetics of human aging: I. Rates of senescence between ages 30 and 70 years in healthy people. J Gerontol Ser A Biol Sci Med Sci 56A:B198–B208Google Scholar
- 4.World Health Organization (2007) WHO global report on falls prevention in older age. Switzerland, Geneva, p 53Google Scholar
- 5.Russo CA, Holmquist L, Elixhauser A (2009) U.S. hospitalizations involving osteoporosis and injury, 2006. HCUP Statistical Brief #76. Rockville, MD, p 12Google Scholar
- 13.Gordon CL, Webber CE, Beaumont LF (2003) Accuracy and precision error of muscle cross-sectional area measured using peripheral quantitative computed tomography in adults. J Bone Miner Res 18(Suppl 2):333 (abstract)Google Scholar
- 15.Ronkainen PH, Pollanen E, Tormakangas T, Tiainen K, Koskenvuo M, Kaprio J, Rantanen T, Sipila S, Kovanen V (2008) Catechol-O-methyltransferase gene polymorphism is associated with skeletal muscle properties in older women alone and together with physical activity. PLoS ONE 3:e1819CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Ducher G, Bass SL, Naughton GA, Eser P, Telford RD, Daly RM (2009) Overweight children have a greater proportion of fat mass relative to muscle mass in the upper limbs than in the lower limbs: implications for bone strength at the distal forearm. Am J Clin Nutr 90:1104–1111CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Gere JM, Timoshenko S (1984) Mechanics of materials. PWS-Kent, BostonGoogle Scholar
- 33.Engelke K, Adams JE, Armbrecht G, Augat P, Bogado CE, Bouxsein ML, Felsenberg D, Ito M, Prevrhal S, Hans DB, Lewiecki EM (2008) Clinical use of quantitative computed tomography and peripheral quantitative computed tomography in the management of osteoporosis in adults: the 2007 ISCD official positions. J Clin Densitom 11:123–162CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar