Effects of bone mineral density of the lumbar spine and prevalent vertebral fractures on the risk of immobility
- 280 Downloads
To clarify the contribution of osteoporosis to future immobilization, a prospective observational study was carried out on Japanese postmenopausal women. The prevalence of low bone mineral density (BMD) and vertebral fracture were independent risks for future immobilization.
Immobilization by hip fracture requires more medical care and higher costs. Osteoporosis increases the risk of hip fracture, but there is little data linking osteoporosis and immobilization in postmenopausal Japanese women.
The study participants consisted of postmenopausal ambulatory volunteers. Baseline information such as BMD, prevalent fractures, comorbidities, pain in the body, and variables were obtained from 1993, and time course of occurrence of immobilization was observed until 2008.
A total of 1,312 participants were enrolled and were observed for a total of 6.7 ± 4.1 years. A total of 75 subjects suffered immobilization. In multivariate analysis to calculate the Cox’s hazard ratio of baseline parameters for immobilization, four independent variables were observed: age (hazard ratio, 1.52 [95% CI, 1.29 to 1.80], p = 0.000), pain in the body (2.54 [1.42 to 4.89, p = 0.001]), low BMD (1.83 [1.10 to 3.13, p = 0.020]), and dementia (3.58 [91.80 to 6.76, p = 0.001]). The hazard ratio of prevalent vertebral fracture was 1.98 (1.20 to 3.30, p = 0.007) instead of low BMD of above model.
These results indicate that low BMD and prevalent vertebral fracture pose an independent risk for future immobilization in postmenopausal Japanese women.
KeywordsDementia Immobilization Osteoporosis Vertebral fracture
Conflicts of interest
- 3.Harada A, Matsui Y, Takemura M, Ito Z, Wakao N, Ota T (2005) Cost-utility analysis of osteoporosis. Jpn J Geriat 16:6–14 In JapaneseGoogle Scholar
- 4.Cabinet Office, Government of Japan (2004) White Paper on the National Lifestyle 2004 A comfortable way of life for the Japanese people, founded on personal relationshipsGoogle Scholar
- 17.Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Ohashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, Kishimoto H (2001) Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee: Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19:331–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 18.Genant HK, Jergas M, Palermo L, Nevitt M, Valentin RS, Black D, Cummings SR (1996) Comparison of semiquantitative visual and quantitative morphometric assessment of prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in osteoporosis. The study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 11:984–996CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 19.Shiraki M, Kuroda T, Nakamura T, Fukunaga M, Hosoi T, Orimo H, Makino K (2006) The sample size required for intervention studies on fracture prevention can be decreased by using a bone resorption marker in the inclusion criteria: prospective study of a subset of the Nagano Cohort, on behalf of the Adequate Treatment of Osteoporosis (A-TOP) Research Group. J Bone Miner Metab 24:219–225CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 22.Cockerill W, Lunt M, Silman AJ, Cooper C, Lips P, Bhalla AK, Cannata JB, Eastell R, Felsenberg D, Gennari C, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Kiss C, Masaryk P, Naves M, Poor G, Raspe H, Reid DM, Reeve J, Stepan J, Todd C, Woolf AD, O’Neill TW (2004) Health-related quality of life and radiographic vertebral fracture. Osteoporos Int 15(2):113–119CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 28.Cotter VT (2007) The burden of dementia. Am J Manag Care Suppl 8:S193–S197Google Scholar
- 29.Nevitt MC, Thompson DE, Black DM, Rubin SR, Ensrud K, Yates AJ, Cummings SR (2000) Effect of alendronate on limited-activity days and bed-disability days caused by back pain in postmenopausal women with existing vertebral fractures. Fracture Intervention Trial Research Group. Arch Intern Med 160(1):77–85CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar