Osteoporosis International

, Volume 21, Issue 3, pp 495–505 | Cite as

The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the UK for the management of osteoporosis using the FRAX®

  • F. Borgström
  • O. Ström
  • J. Coelho
  • H. Johansson
  • A. Oden
  • E. V. McCloskey
  • J. A. Kanis
Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The study estimated the cost-effectiveness of risedronate compared to no treatment in UK women using the FRAX algorithm for fracture risk assessment. A Markov cohort model was used to estimate the cost-effectiveness. Risedronate was found cost-effective from the age of 65 years, assuming a willingness to pay for a QALY of £30,000.

Introduction

The aim of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of risedronate for the prevention and treatment in a UK setting using the FRAX® algorithm for fracture risk assessment. A further aim was to establish intervention thresholds with risedronate treatment.

Methods

The cost-effectiveness of risedronate was compared to no treatment in post-menopausal women with clinical risk factors for fracture using a Markov cohort model populated with data relevant for the UK. The model incorporated the features of FRAX® (the WHO risk assessment tool). The analysis had a health care perspective and quality adjusted life years was used as the main outcome measure.

Results

Treatment was cost-effective from the age of 65 years, assuming a willingness to pay for a QALY of £30,000. Treatment was also cost-effective at all ages in women who had previously sustained a fragility fracture or in women with a parental history of hip fracture with a bone mineral density set at the threshold of osteoporosis. At the £30,000 threshold value for a QALY, risedronate was on average found to cost-effective below the 10-year probability of a major osteoporotic fractures of 13.0%.

Conclusions

Risedronate is a cost-effective agent for the treatment of established osteoporosis (osteoporosis and a prior fragility fracture) in women from the age of 50 years and older and above 65 years in women with osteoporosis alone. The results support the treatment recommendations in recent UK guidelines for osteoporosis.

Keywords

Cost-effectiveness Fractures FRAX Osteoporosis QALY 

References

  1. 1.
    Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Johansson H, Strom O, Borgstrom F, Oden A (2008) Case finding for the management of osteoporosis with FRAX((R))-assessment and intervention thresholds for the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:1395–1408CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Fujiwara S, Nakamura T, Orimo H, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Oden A, Johansson H, Kanis JA (2008) Development and application of a Japanese model of the WHO fracture risk assessment tool (FRAX). Osteoporos Int 19:429–435CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Dawson-Hughes B, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL (2008) Cost-effective osteoporosis treatment thresholds: the United States perspective. Osteoporos Int 19:437–447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dawson-Hughes B, Tosteson AN, Melton LJ 3rd, Baim S, Favus MJ, Khosla S, Lindsay RL (2008) Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA. Osteoporos Int 19:449–458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Siminoski K, Leslie WD, Frame H, Hodsman A, Josse RG, Khan A, Lentle BC, Levesque J, Lyons DJ, Tarulli G, Brown JP (2007) Recommendations for bone mineral density reporting in Canada: a shift to absolute fracture risk assessment. J Clin Densitom 10:120–123CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Kurth AA, Pfeilschifter J (2007) Diagnosis and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis and osteoporosis in men. German Guidelines Update 2006. Orthopade 36:683–690 quiz 691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    National Osteoporosis Guideline Group on behalf of the Bone Research Society, British Geriatrics Society, British Society of Rheumatology, Society of Endocrinology, British Orthopaedic Association, Primary Care Rheumatology Society, Osteoporosis 2000 and Osteoporosis Dorset (2008) Osteoporosis: clinical guideline for prevention and treatmentGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kanis JA, Burlet N, Cooper C, Delmas PD, Reginster JY, Borgstrom F, Rizzoli R (2008) European guidance for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 19:399–428CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAX and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19:385–397CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2005) Bisphosphonates (alendronate, etidronate, risedronate), selective oestrogen receptor modulators (raloxifene) and parathyroid hormone (teriparatide) for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. London. www.nice.org.uk
  11. 11.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007) Final appraisal determination. Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. London. www.nice.org.uk
  12. 12.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2007). Final appraisal determination. Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and strontium ranelate for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. London. www.nice.org.uk
  13. 13.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008). Final appraisal determination. Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene, strontium ranelate and teriparatide for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. London. www.nice.org.uk
  14. 14.
    National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) (2008) Final appraisal determination. Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and strontium ranelate for the primary prevention of osteoporotic fragility fractures in postmenopausal women. London. www.nice.org.uk
  15. 15.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H, De Laet C, Brown J, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Christiansen C, Cummings S, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Gluer C, Goltzman D, Hans D, Krieg MA, La Croix A, McCloskey E, Mellstrom D, Melton LJ 3rd, Pols H, Reeve J, Sanders K, Schott AM, Silman A, Torgerson D, van Staa T, Watts NB, Yoshimura N (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18:1033–1046CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. http://www.nice.org.uk/page.aspx?o=201974. 2008-05-03
  17. 17.
    Borgstrom F, Carlsson A, Sintonen H, Boonen S, Haentjens P, Burge R, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (2006) The cost-effectiveness of risedronate in the treatment of osteoporosis: an international perspective. Osteoporos Int 17:996–1007CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Borgstrom F, Jonsson B, Strom O, Kanis JA (2006) An economic evaluation of strontium ranelate in the treatment of osteoporosis in a Swedish setting: based on the results of the SOTI and TROPOS trials. Osteoporos Int 17:1781–1793CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Jonsson B (2004) Cost-effectiveness of risedronate for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 15:862–871CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Oden A, Sykes D, Jonsson B (2005) Cost-effectiveness of raloxifene in the UK: an economic evaluation based on the MORE study. Osteoporos Int 16:15–25CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Jonsson B, Christiansen C, Johnell O, Hedbrandt J (1995) Cost-effectiveness of fracture prevention in established osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 5:136–142CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Jonsson B, Kanis J, Dawson A, Oden A, Johnell O (1999) Effect and offset of effect of treatments for hip fracture on health outcomes. Osteoporos Int 10:193–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Johnell O, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Black D (2003) Cost effectiveness of alendronate (fosamax) for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. Pharmacoeconomics 21:305–314CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zethraeus N, Johannesson M, Jonsson B (1999) A computer model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of hormone replacement therapy. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 15:352–365PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kanis JA, Adams J, Borgstrom F, Cooper C, Jonsson B, Preedy D, Selby P, Compston J (2008) The cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the management of osteoporosis. Bone 42:4–15CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Zethraeus N, Borgstrom F, Strom O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B (2007) Cost-effectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporosis–a review of the literature and a reference model. Osteoporos Int 18:9–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Borgstrom F, Johnell O, Kanis JA, Jonsson B, Rehnberg C (2006) At what hip fracture risk is it cost-effective to treat? International intervention thresholds for the treatment of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 17:1459–1471CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Kanis JA, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Oden A, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in the UK. Bone 36:22–32CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Johansson H, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2005) Intervention thresholds for osteoporosis in men and women: a study based on data from Sweden. Osteoporos Int 16:6–14CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12:417–427CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Seeley DG, Browner WS, Nevitt MC, Genant HK, Scott JC, Cummings SR (1991) Which fractures are associated with low appendicular bone mass in elderly women? The study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Ann Intern Med 115:837–842PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Singer BR, McLauchlan GJ, Robinson CM, Christie J (1998) Epidemiology of fractures in 15, 000 adults: the influence of age and gender. J Bone Joint Surg Br 80:243–248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    de Lusignan S, Valentin T, Chan T, Hague N, Wood O, van Vlymen J, Dhoul N (2004) Problems with primary care data quality: osteoporosis as an exemplar. Inform Prim Care 12:147–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Stevenson M, Jones ML, De Nigris E, Brewer N, Davis S, Oakley J (2005) A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kanis JA, Brazier JE, Stevenson M, Calvert NW, Lloyd Jones M (2002) Treatment of established osteoporosis: a systematic review and cost-utility analysis. Health Technol Assess 6:1–146PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
  37. 37.
    Oden A, Dawson A, Dere W, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Kanis JA (1998) Lifetime risk of hip fractures is underestimated. Osteoporos Int 8:599–603CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Sernbo I, Redlund-Johnell I, Petterson C, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 15:38–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Reginster J, Minne HW, Sorensen OH, Hooper M, Roux C, Brandi ML, Lund B, Ethgen D, Pack S, Roumagnac I, Eastell R (2000) Randomized trial of the effects of risedronate on vertebral fractures in women with established postmenopausal osteoporosis. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11:83–91CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK, McKeever CD, Hangartner T, Keller M, Chesnut CH 3rd, Brown J, Eriksen EF, Hoseyni MS, Axelrod DW, Miller PD (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy With Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. Jama 282:1344–1352CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    McClung MR, Geusens P, Miller PD, Zippel H, Bensen WG, Roux C, Adami S, Fogelman I, Diamond T, Eastell R, Meunier PJ, Reginster JY (2001) Effect of risedronate on the risk of hip fracture in elderly women. Hip Intervention Program Study Group. N Engl J Med 344:333–340CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Siris ES, Simon JA, Barton IP, McClung MR, Grauer A (2008) Effects of risedronate on fracture risk in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. Osteoporos Int 19:681–686CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Watts NB, Chines A, Olszynski WP, McKeever CD, McClung MR, Zhou X, Grauer A (2008) Fracture risk remains reduced one year after discontinuation of risedronate. Osteoporos Int 19:365–372CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Bagger YZ, Tanko LB, Alexandersen P, Ravn P, Christiansen C (2003) Alendronate has a residual effect on bone mass in postmenopausal Danish women up to 7 years after treatment withdrawal. Bone 33:301–307CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Black DM, Schwartz AV, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Levis S, Quandt SA, Satterfield S, Wallace RB, Bauer DC, Palermo L, Wehren LE, Lombardi A, Santora AC, Cummings SR (2006) Effects of continuing or stopping alendronate after 5 years of treatment: the Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX): a randomized trial. Jama 296:2927–2938CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Lloyd-Jones M, Wilkinson A (2006) Adverse effects and persistence with therapy in patients taking oral alendronate, etidronate or risedronate: a systematic review. NHS R & D HTA ScHARR, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Huybrechts KF, Ishak KJ, Caro JJ (2006) Assessment of compliance with osteoporosis treatment and its consequences in a managed care population. Bone 38:922–928CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Seeman E, Compston J, Adachi J, Brandi ML, Cooper C, Dawson-Hughes B, Jonsson B, Pols H, Cramer JA (2007) Non-compliance: the Achilles' heel of anti-fracture efficacy. Osteoporos Int 18:711–719CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Stevenson M, Davis S, Kanis J (2006) The hospitalization costs and outpatient costs of fragility fractures. Women's Health Medicine 4:149–151Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Lunsjo K, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Rehnberg C, Jonsson B (2006) Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 17:637–650CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Strom O, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, Johnell O, Lidgren L, Ponzer S, Svensson O, Abdon P, Ornstein E, Ceder L, Thorngren KG, Sernbo I, Jonsson B (2008) Long-term cost and effect on quality of life of osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden. Acta Orthop 79:269–280CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Zethraeus N, Borgström F, Ström O, Kanis J, Jönsson B (2006) What is the risk of institutionalization after hip fracture? Osteoporos Int 17(Suppl 2):60Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    McLellan A, Reid D, Forbes K, Reid R, Campbell C, Gregori A (1999) Effectiveness of strategies for the secondary prevention of osteoporotic fractures in Scotland. www.nhshealthquality.org/nhsqis/controller?p_service=Content.show&p_applic=CCC&pContentID=2755. 6th May 2007
  54. 54.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Borgstrom F, Zethraeus N, De Laet C, Jonsson B (2004) The risk and burden of vertebral fractures in Sweden. Osteoporos Int 15:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C, Kanis J (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Kind P, Dolan P, Gudex C, Williams A (1998) Variations in population health status: results from a United Kingdom national questionnaire survey. BMJ 316:736–741PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    World Health Organization Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health care level (2008). www.who.int/chp/topics/rheumatic/en/index.html
  58. 58.
    Kanis J, behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical Report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Strom O, Borgstrom F, Sen SS, Boonen S, Haentjens P, Johnell O, Kanis JA (2007) Cost-effectiveness of alendronate in the treatment of postmenopausal women in 9 European countries–an economic evaluation based on the fracture intervention trial. Osteoporos Int 18:1047–1061CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Royal College of Physicians (1999) Osteoporosis: clinical guidelines for the prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians, LondonGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain (2000) Update on pharmacological interventions and an algorithm for management. Royal College of Physicians and Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain, LondonGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Royal College of Physicians, Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain and National Osteoporosis Society Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis (2002) Guidelines on prevention and treatment. Royal College of Physicians, Bone and Tooth Society of Great Britain and National Osteoporosis Society Glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis, LondonGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    European Community (1998) Report on osteoporosis in the European Community. EC, StrasbourgGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Kanis JA, Delmas P, Burckhardt P, Cooper C, Torgerson D (1997) Guidelines for diagnosis and management of osteoporosis. The European Foundation for Osteoporosis and Bone Disease. Osteoporos Int 7:390–406CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Iglesias CP, Torgerson DJ, Bearne A, Bose U (2002) The cost utility of bisphosphonate treatment in established osteoporosis. QJM 95:305–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167:S1–S34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Kanis JA, Black D, Cooper C, Dargent P, Dawson-Hughes B, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman J, Johnell O, Jonsson B, Melton L, Oden A, Papapoulos S, Pols H, Rizzoli R, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2002) A new approach to the development of assessment guidelines for osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 13:527–536CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • F. Borgström
    • 1
    • 2
  • O. Ström
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. Coelho
    • 2
  • H. Johansson
    • 3
  • A. Oden
    • 3
  • E. V. McCloskey
    • 3
  • J. A. Kanis
    • 3
  1. 1.Medical Management CentreKarolinska InstituteStockholmSweden
  2. 2.I3 InnovusStockholmSweden
  3. 3.Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases (WHO Collaborating Centre) University of Sheffield Medical SchoolSheffieldUK

Personalised recommendations