Assessment of trabecular and cortical architecture and mechanical competence of bone by high-resolution peripheral computed tomography: comparison with transiliac bone biopsy
- 601 Downloads
We compared microarchitecture and mechanical competence parameters measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) and finite-element analysis of radius and tibia to those measured by histomorphometry, micro-CT, and finite-element analysis of transiliac bone biopsies. Correlations were weak to moderate between parameters measured on biopsies and scans.
HR-pQCT is a new imaging technique that assesses trabecular and cortical bone microarchitecture of the radius and tibia in vivo. The purpose of this study was to determine the extent to which microarchitectural variables measured by HR-pQCT reflect those measured by the “gold standard,” transiliac bone biopsy.
HR-pQCT scans (Xtreme CT, Scanco Medical AG) and iliac crest bone biopsies were performed in 54 subjects (aged 39 ± 10 years). Biopsies were analyzed by 2D quantitative histomorphometry and 3D microcomputed tomography (µCT). Apparent Young’s modulus, an estimate of mechanical competence or strength, was determined by micro-finite-element analysis (µFE) of biopsy µCT and HR-pQCT images.
The strongest correlations observed were between trabecular parameters (bone volume fraction, number, separation) measured by µCT of biopsies and HR-pQCT of the radius (R 0.365–0.522; P < 0.01). Cortical width of biopsies correlated with cortical thickness by HR-pQCT, but only at the tibia (R = 0.360, P < 0.01). Apparent Young’s modulus calculated by µFE of biopsies correlated with that calculated for both radius (R = 0.442; P < 0.001) and tibia (R = 0.380; P < 0.001) HR-pQCT scans.
The associations between peripheral (HR-pQCT) and axial (transiliac biopsy) measures of microarchitecture and estimated mechanical competence are significant but modest.
KeywordsBone density Bone imaging Bone structure
Conflicts of interest
The authors have no financial relationship with the organizations that sponsored the research and have no disclosures. The authors have had full control of all primary data and agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.
- 8.Courpron P, Meunier PJ, Bressot C, Giroux JM (1976) Amount of bone in iliac crest biopsy: significance of the trabecular bone volume. Its values in normal and pathological conditions. In: Meunier PJ (ed) Proc Second International Workshop on Bone Histomorphometry. Society de la Nouvelle Imprimerie Fournie, Toulouse, pp 39–53Google Scholar
- 9.Dempster DW, Shane E (2002) Bone quantification and dynamics of bone turnover. In: Becker KL (ed) Principles and practice of endocrinology and metabolism. Lippincott, Philadelphia, pp 475–479Google Scholar
- 10.Dempster DW, Parisien M, Silverberg SJ, Liang XG, Schnitzer M, Shen V, Shane E, Kimmel DB, Recker R, Lindsay R, Bilezikian JP (1999) On the mechanism of cancellous bone preservation in postmenopausal women with mild primary hyperparathyroidism. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 84:1562–1566CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 11.Dempster DW, Cosman F, Kurland ES, Zhou H, Nieves J, Woelfert L, Shane E, Plavetic K, Muller R, Bilezikian J, Lindsay R (2001) Effects of daily treatment with parathyroid hormone on bone microarchitecture and turnover in patients with osteoporosis: a paired biopsy study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1846–1853CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 31.Melton LJ 3rd, Riggs BL, van Lenthe GH, Achenbach SJ, Muller R, Bouxsein ML, Amin S, Atkinson EJ, Khosla S (2007) Contribution of in vivo structural measurements and load/strength ratios to the determination of forearm fracture risk in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 22:1442–1448CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 32.Meunier PJ, Bressot C (1983) Endocrine influences on bone cells and bone remodeling evaluated by clinical histomorphometry. Raven, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 33.Miki T, Nakatsuka K, Naka H, Masaki H, Imanishi Y, Ito M, Inaba M, Morii H, Nishizawa Y (2004) Effect and safety of intermittent weekly administration of human parathyroid hormone 1-34 in patients with primary osteoporosis evaluated by histomorphometry and microstructural analysis of iliac trabecular bone before and after 1 year of treatment. J Bone Miner Metab 22:569–576CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 36.Parfitt AM, Mathews CH, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS (1983) Relationships between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. Implications for the microanatomic and cellular mechanisms of bone loss. J Clin Invest 72:1396–1409CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 41.Recker RR, Barger-Lux MJ Transilial bone biopsy. In: Bilezikian JP, Raisz LG, Rodan GA (eds) Principles of bone biology. Academic, San Diego, p 1625-1634Google Scholar
- 44.Riggs BL, Melton LJ, Robb RA, Camp JJ, Atkinson EJ, McDaniel L, Amin S, Rouleau PA, Khosla S (2008) A population-based assessment of rates of bone loss at multiple skeletal sites: evidence for substantial trabecular bone loss in young adult women and men. J Bone Miner Res 23:205–214CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 45.Rubin MR, Dempster DW, Sliney J, Compito C, Müller R, Paschalis EP, Roschger P, Zoehrer R, Klaushofer K, Zhou H, Kohler T, Silverberg SJ, Bilezikian JP (2006) Indices of bone quality are markedly abnormal in hypoparathyroidism. In: American Society for Bone and Mineral Research 28th Annual Meeting and JBMR in press, Philadelphia, PAGoogle Scholar