Determinants of bone mass and size in 7-year-old former term, late-preterm, and preterm boys
When compared, full-term prepubertal boys had greater regional bone size, higher total body (TB) bone mineral content (BMC), and regional bone density than preterm boys but higher TB bone content area and regional BMC than late-preterm boys. Implications include follow-up bone assessment and preterm formula feeding in late-preterm boys.
This study was conducted to determine whether there are differences in bone mass and size among prepubertal boys born preterm (PT; ≤34 weeks gestation), late-preterm (LP; >34 and ≤37 weeks gestation), and at term (>37 weeks gestation) and to identify factors that are associated with bone mass and size in these children.
Total body (TB), spine and hip dual energy X-ray absorptiometry and tibia peripheral quantitative computed tomography measures were obtained on 24 boys aged 5.7 to 8.3 years.
In multiple regression analysis adjusting for current weight, height, age, and jump power, term boys had greater cortical thickness (p = 0.03) and area (p = 0.01), higher trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (p = 0.05), TB bone mineral content (BMC; p = 0.007), and hip areal bone mineral density (aBMD; p = 0.01) than PT boys, and higher TB BMC (p = 0.01), TB bone area (p = 0.03), hip BMC (p = 0.02) and aBMD (p = 0.01), and femoral neck BMC (p = 0.05) and aBMD (p = 0.02) than LP boys. There were no differences in activity measures among gestation groups and no group-by-activity interactions.
Term boys have greater bone size and mass than PT boys and higher bone mass than LP boys at several bone sites. Activity measures did not differ among gestation groups and did not explain bone differences.
KeywordsActivity Gestation Jump power Late-preterm Prepubertal children Preterm formula
This project was funded by the Ethel Austin Martin Endowed Program in Human Nutrition.
Conflicts of interest
- 3.American Academy of Pediatrics, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (eds) (2002) Standard Terminology for Reporting of Reproductive Health Statistics in The United States. Elk Grove, IL, pp 377-394Google Scholar
- 8.Specker B, Johannsen N, Binkley T et al (2001) Total body bone mineral content and tibial cortical bone measures in preschool children. J Bone Miner Res 22:298–305Google Scholar
- 16.Hamilton B, Martin J, Ventura S. Births: Preliminary data for 2006 (2007) National Vital Statistics Reports (NVSR) 56(7)Google Scholar
- 17.Martin J, Hamilton B, Sutton P, et al. Births (2005) Final data for 2003. In: National vital statistics Reports. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics 1-116Google Scholar
- 18.Institute of Medicine (2006) Preterm birth: Causes, consequences, and prevention. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
- 20.National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement. Limitation of Exposure to Ionzing Radiation (1993). Bethesda, MD: National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurement Report No.: (NCRP#116)Google Scholar
- 23.Montoye H, Kemper H, Saris W et al (1996) Measuring physical activity and energy expenditure. Champaign, ILGoogle Scholar
- 26.National Center for Health Statistics and the National Center for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (2000) 2 to 20 years: Boys Body mass index-for-age percentiles [cited 2009 January 03]. Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/growthcharts
- 28.McKay H, Mirwald R, Bailey D (2000) A 7-year longitudinal study comparison of peak bone mineral, peak lean, and peak fat mass accrual velocities and peak height velocity. Calcif Tissue Int (Suppl. 1):S58Google Scholar
- 31.Lorentzon M, Mellstrom D, Ohlsson C (2005) Association of amount of physical activity with cortical bone size and trabecular volumetric BMD in young adult men: the GOOD Study. J Bone Miner Metab 20:1936–1943Google Scholar