Osteoporosis International

, Volume 20, Issue 9, pp 1547–1552 | Cite as

Spinal deformity index (SDI) is a good predictor of incident vertebral fractures

Original Article

Abstract

Summary

The spinal deformity index is a convenient tool to quantify the number and the severity of prevalent vertebral fractures. It is a predictor of the risk of sustaining incident vertebral fracture. This quantification must be taken into account to improve management of patients.

Introduction

Prevalent fractures are strong risk factors for subsequent fractures.

Methods

The study subjects were women from the placebo groups of two studies of strontium ranelate in postmenopausal osteoporosis (N = 723 and 637 patients, respectively). Three lateral radiographs of the spine were obtained at baseline and annually over 3 years, according to standardized procedures. The semiquantitative visual assessment of each vertebra from T4 to L4 was performed by the same reader throughout the study. A spinal deformity index (SDI) was calculated by summing for each patient the grade of each vertebra from T4 to L4.

Results

There was a linear relationship between baseline SDI and the 3-year incidence of vertebral fracture (adjusted R2 = 0.76). The 3-year incidence of vertebral fractures was different among the tertiles of baseline SDI: 17.3 ± 3.6%, 25.4 ± 2.6%, and 47.6 ± 3.1% from the lowest to the highest, respectively. There was no relationship between SDI and non-vertebral fractures incidence.

Conclusion

SDI is a good predictor of incident vertebral fractures. Patients with highest SDI should receive highest priority to treatment.

Keywords

Osteoporosis Risk factors SDI Vertebral fracture 

References

  1. 1.
    Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, Minshall ME, Shen W, Cooper C et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Melton LJ, Lane AW, Cooper C, Eastell R, O’Fallon WM, Riggs BL (1993) Prevalence and incidence of vertebral deformities. Osteoporos Int 3:113–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bjarnason NH, Sarkar S, Duong T, Mitlak B, Delmas PD, Christiansen C (2001) Six and twelve month changes in bone turnover are related to reduction in vertebral fracture risk during 3 years of raloxifene treatment in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12:922–30PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Siris ES, Genant HK, Laster AJ, Chen P, Misurski DA, Krege JH (2007) Enhanced prediction of fracture risk combining vertebral fracture status and BMD. Osteoporos Int 18:761–770PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ross PD, Davis JW, Epstein RS, Wasnich RD (1991) Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women. Ann Intern Med 1:919–23Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Black DM, Arden NK, Palermo L, Pearson J, Cummings SR (1999) Prevalent vertebral deformities predict hip fractures and new vertebral deformities but not wrist fractures. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. J Bone Miner Res 14:821–8PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA 3rd, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15:721–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Lindsay R, Silverman SL, Cooper C, Hanley DA, Barton I, Broy SB et al (2001) Risk of new vertebral fracture in the year following a fracture. JAMA 285:320–323PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Melton LJIII, Wenger DE, Atkinson EJ, Achenbach SJ, Berquist TH, Riggs BL et al (2006) Influence of baseline deformity definition on subsequent vertebral fracture risk in post menopausal women. Osteoporos Int 17:978–985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Minne HW, Leidig G, Wüster C, Siromachkostov L, Baldauf G, Bickel R et al (1988) A newly developed spine deformity index (SDI) to quantitate vertebral crush fractures in patients with osteoporosis. Bone Miner 3:335–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Genant HK, Wu CY, Van Kujik C, Nevitt MC (1993) Vertebral fracture assessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Miner Res 8:1137–48PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Crans GG, Genant HK, Krege JH (2005) Prognostic utility of a semiquantitative spinal deformity index. Bone 37:175–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Reginster JY, Seeman E, De Vernejoul MC, Adami S, Compston J, Phenekos C et al (2005) Strontium ranelate reduces the risk of nonvertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: Treatment of Peripheral Osteoporosis (TROPOS) study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 90:2816–22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meunier PJ, Roux C, Seeman E, Ortolani S, Badurski JE, Spector TD et al (2004) The effects of strontium ranelate on the risk of vertebral fracture in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 350:459–68PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Roux C, Reginster JY, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, Sawicki A, Tulassay Z et al (2006) Vertebral fracture risk reduction with strontium ranelate in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis is independent of baseline risk factors. J Bone Miner Res 21:536–42PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Slosman D, Provvedini DM, Meunier PJ, Delmas PD, Sebert JL, De Vernejoul MC et al (1999) The use of different dual X-ray absorptiometry brands in a multicenter clinical trial. J Clin Densitom 2:37–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Delmas PD, De Langerijt L, Watts NB, Eastell R, Genant H, Grauer A et al (2005) Underdiagnosis of vertebral fractures is a worldwide problem: the IMPACT study. J Bone Miner Res 20:557–563PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gehlbach SH, Bigelow C, Heimisdottir M, May S, Walker M, Kirkwood JR (2000) Recognition of vertebral fracture in a clinical setting. Osteoporos Int 11:577–82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Roux C, Fechtenbaum J, Kolta S, Briot K, Girard M (2007) Mild prevalent and incident vertebral fractures are risk factors for new fractures. Osteoporos Int. 18:1617–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, Verdoncq B, Orcel P, Roux C (2005) Reporting of vertebral fractures on spine X-rays. Osteoporos Int. 16:1823–6PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kado DM, Huang MH, Barrett-Connor E, Greendale GA (2005) Hyperkyphotic posture and poor physical functional ability in older community-dwelling men and women: the Rancho Bernardo study. J Gerontol A Biol Med Sci 60:633–7Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinaki M, Brey RH, Hughes CA, Larson DR, Kaufman KR (2005) Balance disorder and increased risk of falls in osteoporosis and kyphosis: significance of kyphotic posture and muscle strength. Osteoporos Int. 16:1004–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Genant HK, Delmas PD, Chen P, Jiang Y, Eriksen EF, Dalsky GP et al (2007) Severity of vertebral fracture reflects deterioration of bone microarchitecture. Osteoporos Int 18:69–76PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. Kerkeni
    • 1
  • S. Kolta
    • 1
  • J. Fechtenbaum
    • 1
  • C. Roux
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Cochin Hospital, Rheumatology DepartmentParis Descartes UniversityParisFrance
  2. 2.Rheumatology DepartmentCochin HospitalParisFrance

Personalised recommendations