The incidence and risk of hip fracture in Poland
- 181 Downloads
This study determined the incidence and probability of hip fractures in Poland based on verified hospital discharge notes from all of Poland. In the over-50-year-old population, hip fracture incidence was found to be 89/100,000 for men and 156/100,000 for women. Poland is among the countries with the lowest hip fracture risk in Europe.
It is recommended that intervention thresholds should be based on an assessment of absolute fracture risk. Probability of hip fracture is calculated from the incidence of hip fracture in a given population and the incidence of death. The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and the absolute risk of hip fracture for men and women in Poland.
The study was based on National Health Fund data from all of Poland for the year 2005. Hospital discharge notes reporting an incident fracture were identified from among all those containing a matching ICD code. Lifetime and 10-year fracture probabilities were calculated taking into account the mortality risk and BMD.
In 2005, there were 17,625 hip fractures diagnosed in Poland which was 30.2% less than the number of hospital discharge notes containing such a diagnosis in that year. In the over-50-year-old population, hip fracture incidence was found to be 89/100,000 for men and 165/100,000 for women. In the 50–65-year band, hip fracture incidence was higher in men than in women. The remaining lifetime probability of hip fracture at the age of 50 years was 2.0% for men and 4.5% for women which are among the lowest in Europe.
Hip fracture incidence and thus the probability of hip fracture risk in Poland is amongst the lowest in Europe. The authors recommend establishing a standard method for determining hip fracture incidence in a given country in order to standardize data.
KeywordsFracture incidence Fracture risk Hip fracture Intervention threshold Osteoporosis Prevention Proximal femur fracture
We are grateful to the President of the National Health Fund in Warsaw, the Director of the Department of Reports and Analysis of the National Health Fund in Warsaw and Dariusz Dzielak for assistance in gathering data.
Conflicts of interest
- 1.WHO Study Group (eds) (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Technical Report 843, GenevaGoogle Scholar
- 2.Marshall D, Johnell O, Wedel H (1996) Meta-analysis of how well measures of bone mineral density predict occurrence of osteoporotic fractures. Br Med J 312:1254–1259Google Scholar
- 3.Burger H, de Laet CE, van Daele PL et al (2000) Risk factors for increase bone loss in an elderly population: the Rotterdam Osteoporosis Study. Am J Epidemiol 147(9):871–879Google Scholar
- 7.Kanis JA on behalf of the World Health Organization Scientific Group (2008) Assessment of osteoporosis at the primary health-care level. Technical report. WHO Collaborating Centre, University of Sheffield, UKGoogle Scholar
- 10.Prevention, clinical assessment and therapy of osteoporosis for women after menopause, for men after age 60. Dachverbandes der deutschsprachigen osteologischen Fachgesellschaften. (2006) (http://www.lutherhaus.de/dvo-leitlinen, accessed 4 December 2006)
- 12.Brown JP, Josse RG, Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Canadian Med Assoc Journal 167(Suppl.):1–22Google Scholar
- 16.Roszkowska H, Goryński P, Wojtyniak B (1998) Hospitalizacja z powodu złamania szyjki kości udowej w Polsce w latach 1979–1995 wg płci, wieku i miejsca zamieszkania. Postepy Osteoartrologii 10:150–156Google Scholar
- 17.Jaworski M, Lorenc RS (2007) Risk of hip fracture in Poland. Med Sci Monit 13:206–210Google Scholar