Osteoporosis International

, 20:399

Clinical risk factors for osteoporotic fractures in Brazilian women and men: the Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS)

  • M. M. Pinheiro
  • R. M. Ciconelli
  • L. A. Martini
  • M. B. Ferraz
Original Article



The Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS) is the first epidemiological study carried out in a representative sample of Brazilian men and women aged 40 years or older. The prevalence of fragility fractures is about 15.1% in the women and 12.8% in the men. Moreover, advanced age, sedentarism, family history of hip fracture, current smoking, recurrent falls, diabetes mellitus and poor quality of life are the main clinical risk factors associated with fragility fractures.


The Brazilian Osteoporosis Study (BRAZOS) is the first epidemiological study carried out in a representative sample of Brazilian men and women aged 40 years or older with the purpose of identifying the prevalence and the main clinical risk factors (CRF) associated with osteoporotic fracture in our population.


A total of 2,420 individuals (women, 70%) from 150 different cities in the five geographic regions in Brazil, and all different socio-economical classes were selected to participate in the present survey. Anthropometrical data as well as life habits, fracture history, food intake, physical activity, falls and quality of life were determined by individual quantitative interviews. The representative sampling was based on Brazilian National data provided by the 2000 and 2003 census. Low trauma fracture was defined as that resulting of a fall from standing height or less in individuals 50 years or older at specific skeletal sites: forearm, femur, ribs, vertebra and humerus. Sampling error was 2.2% with 95% confidence intervals. Logistic regression analysis models were designed having the fragility fracture as the dependent variable and all other parameters as the independent variable. Significance level was set as p < 0.05.


The average of age, height and weight for men and women were 58.4 ± 12.8 and 60.1 ± 13.7 years, 1.67 ± 0.08 and 1.56 ± 0.07 m and 73.3 ± 14.7 and 64.7 ± 13.7 kg, respectively. About 15.1% of the women and 12.8% of the men reported fragility fractures. In the women, the main CRF associated with fractures were advanced age (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.06–2.4), family history of hip fracture (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.1–2.8), early menopause (OR = 1.7; 95% CI 1.02–2.9), sedentary lifestyle (OR = 1.6; 95% CI 1.02–2.7), poor quality of life (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.2–2.9), higher intake of phosphorus (OR = 1.9; 95% CI 1.2–2.9), diabetes mellitus (OR = 2.8; 95% CI 1.01–8.2), use of benzodiazepine drugs (OR = 2.0; 95% CI 1.1–3.6) and recurrent falls (OR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2–5.0). In the men, the main CRF were poor quality of life (OR = 3.2; 95% CI 1.7–6.1), current smoking (OR = 3.5; 95% CI 1.28–9.77), diabetes mellitus (OR = 4.2; 95% CI 1.27–13.7) and sedentary lifestyle (OR = 6.3; 95% CI 1.1–36.1).


Our findings suggest that CRF may contribute as an important tool to identify men and women with higher risk of osteoporotic fractures and that interventions aiming at specific risk factors (quit smoking, regular physical activity, prevention of falls) may help to manage patients to reduce their risk of fracture.


Brazilian population Clinical risk factors Epidemiology Fracture Men and women Osteoporosis 


  1. 1.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Jonsson B, de Laet C, Dawson A (2001) The burden of osteoporotic fractures: a method for setting intervention thresholds. Osteoporos Int 12(5):417–427PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16(Suppl 2):S3–S7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Garcia R, Leme MD, Garcez-Leme LE (2006) Evolution of Brazilian elderly with hip fracture secondary to a fall. Clinics 61(6):539–544PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Vidal EI, Coeli CM, Pinheiro RS, Camargo KR (2006) Mortality within 1 year after hip fracture surgical repair in the elderly according to postoperative period: a probabilistic record linkage study in Brazil. Osteoporos Int 17(10):1569–1576PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinheiro MM, Castro CM, Szejnfeld VL (2006) Low femoral bone mineral density and quantitative ultrasound are risk factors for new osteoporotic fracture and total and cardiovascular mortality: a 5-year population-based study of brazilian elderly women. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 61(2):196–203PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castro da Rocha FA, Ribeiro AR (2003) Low incidence of hip fractures in an equatorial area. Osteoporos Int 14(6):496–499PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silveira VA, Medeiros, Coelho-Filho JM et al (2005) Hip fracture incidence in an urban area in Northeast Brazil. Cad Saude Publica 21(3):907–912PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Komatsu RS, Ramos LR, Szejnfeld VL (2004) Incidence of proximal femur fractures in Marilia, Brazil. J Nutr Health Aging 8(5):362–367PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Abrahamsen B, Rejnmark L, Nielsen SP et al (2006) Ten-year prediction of osteoporosis from baseline bone mineral density: development of prognostic thresholds in healthy postmenopausal women. The Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. Osteoporos Int 17(2):245–251Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L et al (2001) As assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12:519–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E et al (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286(22):2815–2822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Dargent-Molina P, Douchin MN, Cormier C, Meunier PJ, Breart G, and EPIDOS Study Group (2002) Use of clinical risk factors in elderly women with low bone mineral density to identify women at higher risk of hip fracture: The EPIDOS prospective study. Osteoporos Int 13(7):593–599PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Henry MJ, Pasco JA, Sanders KM, Nicholson GC, Kotowicz MA (2006) Fracture Risk (FRISK) Score: Geelong Osteoporosis Study. Radiology 241(1):190–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Black DM, Palermo L, Pearson J, Abbott T, Johnell O (1998) A simple, useful risk factor system can identify the large majority of women with osteoporosis. Bone 23(Suppl 5):605Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Kreiger N, McIsaac WJ, Darlington GA, Tu JV (2000) Development and validation of the Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Instrument to facilitate selection of women for bone densitometry. CMAJ 162(9):1289–1294PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Koh LK, Sedrine WB, Torralba TP et al (2001) Osteoporosis Self-Assessment Tool for Asians (OSTA) Research Group. A simple tool to identify Asian women at increased risk of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 12(8):699–705PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sen SS, Rives VP, Messina OD et al (2005) A risk assessment tool (OsteoRisk) for identifying Latin American women with osteoporosis. J Gen Intern Med 20(3):245–250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kanis JA, Oden A, Johnell O, Johansson H et al (2007) The use of clinical risk factors enhances the performance of BMD in the prediction of hip and osteoporotic fractures in men and women. Osteoporos Int 18(8):1033–1046PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatística 2000. http://www.ibge.gov.br/home/estatistica/populacao/censo2000/default.shtm
  20. 20.
  21. 21.
    Ware JE, Kosinski M, Dewey JE et al (2001) How to score and interpret single-item health status measures: a manual for users of the SF-8 Health Survey. Lincoln RI: Quality Metric IncorporatedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Florindo AA, Latorre M do R, Jaime PC, Tanaka T, Zerbini CA (2004) Methodology to evaluation the habitual physical activity in men aged 50 years or more. Rev Saude Publica 38(2):307–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Schwartz AV, Villa ML, Prill M et al (1999) Falls in older mexican-American women. J Am Geriatr Soc 47(11):1371–1378PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rodrigues Camargo MB, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR et al (2005) Bone mineral density and osteoporosis among a predominantly Caucasian elderly population in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. Osteoporos Int 16(11):1451–1460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ramalho AC, Lazaretti-Castro M, Hauache O, Vieira JG, Takata E, Cafalli F, Tavares F (2001) Osteoporotic fractures of proximal femur: clinical and epidemiological features in a population of the city of Sao Paulo. Sao Paulo Med J 119(2):48–53PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Pinheiro MM, Castro CH, Frisoli A, Szejnfeld VL (2003) Discriminatory ability of quantitative ultrasound measurements is similar to dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in a Brazilian women population with osteoporotic fracture. Calcif Tissue Int 73(6):555–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Siqueira FV, Facchini LA, Hallal PC (2005) The burden of fractures in Brazil: a population-based study. Bone 37(2):261–266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Albrand G, Munoz F, Sornay-Rendu E, DuBoeuf F, Delmas PD (2003) Independent predictors of all osteoporosis-related fractures in healthy postmenopausal women: the OFELY study. Bone 32(1):78–85PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Taylor BC, Schreiner PJ, Stone KL et al (2004) Long-term prediction of incident hip fracture risk in elderly white women: Study of Osteoporotic Fractures. J Am Geriatr Soc 52(9):1479–1486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Robbins J, Schott AM, Azari R, Kronmal R (2006) Body mass index is not a good predictor of bone density: results from WHI, CHS, and EPIDOS. J Clin Densitom 9(3):329–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Montilla RNG, Aldrighi JM, Marucci MFN (2004) Calcium/protein relation of women on the climacteric. Rev Assoc Med Bras 50(1):52–54PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Lerner BR, Lei DLM, Chaves SP et al (2000) Consumption of calcium by adolescents from public schools em Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil. Rev Nutr 13(1):57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Saraiva GL, Cendoroglo MS, Ramos LR et al (2005) Influence of ultraviolet radiation on the production of 25 hydroxyvitamin D in the elderly population in the city of Sao Paulo (23 o 34¢S), Brazil. Osteoporos Int 16(12):1649–1654PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Heaney RP (2001) Constructive interactions among nutrients and bone-active pharmacologic agents with principal emphasis on calcium, phosphorus, vitamin D and protein. J Am Coll Nutr 20(5 Suppl):403S–409SPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Miao J, Brismar K, Nyren O, Ugarph-Morawski A, Ye W (2005) Elevated hip fracture risk in type 1 diabetic patients: a population-based cohort study in Sweden. Diabetes Care 28(12):2850–2855PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Carnevale V, Romagnoli E, D’Erasmo E (2004) Skeletal involvement in patients with diabetes mellitus. Diabetes Metab Res Rev 20(3):196–204PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pluijm SM, Smit JH, Tromp EA, Stel VS, Deeg DJ, Bouter LM, Lips P (2006) A risk profile for identifying community-dwelling elderly with a high risk of recurrent falling: results of a 3-year prospective study. Osteoporos Int 17(3):417–425PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Takkouche B, Montes-Martinez A, Gill SS, Etminan M (2007) Psychotropic medications and the risk of fracture: a meta-analysis. Drug Saf 30(2):171–184PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Florindo AA, Latorre M do R, Jaime PC, Tanaka T, Pippa MG, Zerbini CA (2002) Past and present habitual physical activity and its relationship with bone mineral density in men aged 50 years and older in Brazil. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci 57(10):M654–M657PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Tanaka T, Latorre MR, Jaime PC, Florindo AA, Pippa MG, Zerbini CA (2001) Risk factors for proximal femur osteoporosis in men aged 50 years or older. Osteoporos Int 12(11):942–949PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lewis CE, Ewing SK, Taylor BC, Shikany JM, Fink HA, Ensrud KE, Barrett-Connor E, Cummings SR, Orwoll E and Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Study Research Group (2007) Predictors of non-spine fracture in elderly men: the MrOS study. J Bone Miner Res 22(2):211–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Lazaretti-Castro M, Duarte-de-Oliveira MA, Russo EM, Vieira JG (1997) Vitamin D receptor alleles and bone mineral density in a normal premenopausal Brazilian female population. Braz J Med Biol Res 30(8):929–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Barros ER, Kasamatsu TS, Ramalho AC, Hauache OM, Vieira JG, Lazaretti-Castro M (2002) Bone mineral density in young women of the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil: correlation with both collagen type I alpha 1 gene polymorphism and clinical aspects. Braz J Med Biol Res 35(8):885–893PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Brenneman SK, Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan S, Markson LE, Siris ES (2006) Impact of recent fracture on health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women. J Bone Miner Res 21(6):809–816PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Fechtenbaum J, Cropet C, Kolta S, Horlait S, Orcel P, Roux C (2005) The severity of vertebral fractures and health-related quality of life in osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16(12):2175–2179PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Kanis JA (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its appication to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis: synopsis of a WHO report. WHO Study Group. Osteoporos Int 4(6):368–381PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. M. Pinheiro
    • 1
    • 4
  • R. M. Ciconelli
    • 1
    • 2
  • L. A. Martini
    • 3
  • M. B. Ferraz
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Rheumatology DivisionFederal University of Sao Paulo, Unifesp/ EPMSão PauloBrazil
  2. 2.Paulista Center of Health’s EconomyFederal University of Sao Paulo, Unifesp/ EPMSão PauloBrazil
  3. 3.Department of NutritionFaculty of Public Health, University of Sao Paulo, USPSão PauloBrazil
  4. 4.São PauloBrazil

Personalised recommendations