Osteoporosis International

, 19:1733

A multifaceted intervention to improve treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures: a cluster randomized trial

  • A. Cranney
  • M. Lam
  • L. Ruhland
  • R. Brison
  • M. Godwin
  • M. M. Harrison
  • M. B. Harrison
  • T. Anastassiades
  • J. M. Grimshaw
  • I. D. Graham
Original Artic le

Abstract

Summary

In a cluster randomized trial, we evaluated the effect of a multifaceted intervention (directed at both patient and primary care physician) on the rates of testing and treatment of osteoporosis in postmenopausal women within six months of their wrist fracture. Compared to usual care, women in the intervention practices were three times more likely to receive bone mineral density testing and prescribed osteoporosis treatments.

Introduction

Postmenopausal women with wrist fractures are at increased risk of future fragility fractures, yet they frequently do not receive evaluation and treatment for osteoporosis. We set out to evaluate a multifaceted intervention designed to improve management of osteoporosis in older women with recent wrist fractures.

Methods

Cluster randomized trial of 270 women cared for in 119 primary care practices. We recruited postmenopausal women with an acute wrist fracture from the emergency departments of hospitals in southeastern Ontario, Canada. Family practices were randomly assigned to either the intervention or usual care. The intervention consisted of a mailed reminder with a summary of treatment guidelines and letter sent to the primary care physician, in addition to an educational package and letter to the women. The primary outcome was the proportion of women prescribed osteoporosis therapy within 6 months of their fracture.

Results

The mean age of women was 69(10.9) years. The intervention increased the proportion of women started on osteoporosis medications (28% vs. 10%) of controls, adjusted OR 3.45, 95% CI, 1.58–7.56, p = 0.002) and the proportion who had a bone mineral density (BMD) test (53.3% vs. 26%) of controls, OR 3.38, 95% CI, 1.83–6.26, p < 0.001). In addition to the intervention, having a female physician was a predictor of increased testing and treatment rates.

Conclusion

A multifaceted intervention significantly improved rates of osteoporosis treatment and BMD testing in postmenopausal women with wrist fractures.

Keywords

Cluster randomized trial Multifaceted intervention Osteoporosis Wrist fractures 

References

  1. 1.
    NIH consensus development panel on osteoporosis prevention and diagnosis. Osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis, prophylaxis and treatment. JAMA 2001; 285:785–795Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Jaglal S (1998) Osteoporotic fractures: Incidence and impact. In: Williams JL, Badley EM (eds) (1998) Arthritis and Related Conditions. Institute for Clinical and Evaluative Sciences, Toronto, pp 143-156Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Klotzbuecher CM, Ross PD, Landsman PB, Abbott TA III, Berger M (2000) Patients with prior fractures have an increased risk of future fractures: a summary of the literature and statistical synthesis. J Bone Miner Res 15(4):721–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, De Laet C, Johansson H, Oden A, Delmas P et al (2004) A meta-analysis of previous fracture and subsequent fracture risk. Bone 35(2):375–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Barrett-Connor E, Sajjan SG, Siris ES, Miller PD, Chen YT, Markson LE (2007) Wrist fracture as a predictor of future fractures in younger versus older postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). Osteoporos Int 19(5) 607-613Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Brown JP, Josse RG (2002) clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167(10 Suppl):S1–S34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cranney A, Guyatt G, Griffith L, Wells G, Tugwell P, Rosen C (2002) Meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. IX: Summary of meta-analyses of therapies for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Endocr Rev 23(4):570–578PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35(5):293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Atkinson EJ, Tabini C, O’Fallon WM et al (2002) Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures: a missed opportunity? Arc of Intern Med 162(4):421–426CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Siris ES, Bilezikian JP, Rubin MR, Black DM, Bockman RS, Bone HG et al (2003) Pins and plaster aren’t enough: a call for the evaluation and treatment of patients with osteoporotic fractures. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 88(8):3482–3486PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Bliuc D, Ong CR, Eisman JA, Center JR (2005) Barriers to effective management of osteoporosis in moderate and minimal trauma fractures: A prospective study. Osteoporos Int 16(8):977–982PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bliuc D, Eisman JA, Center JR (2006) A randomized study of two different information-based interventions on the management of osteoporosis in minimal and moderate trauma fractures. Osteoporos Int 17(9):1309–1317PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L (2002) Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc 77(4):334–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic LA, Lagendyk LE, Petersen KM (2004) After the fall: women’s views of fractures in relation to bone health at midlife. Women Health 39(2):47–62PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Meadows LM, Mrkonjic LA, O’Brien MD, Tink W (2007) The importance of communication in secondary fragility fracture treatment and prevention. Osteoporos Int 18(2):159–166PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Grimshaw JM, Thomas RE, MacLennan G, Fraser C, Ramsay CR, Vale L et al (2004) Effectiveness and efficiency of guideline dissemination and implementation strategies. Health Technol Assess 8(6):iii–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw JM, Harvey E, Oxman AD, Thomson MA (1998) Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. The Cochrane Effective Practice and Organization of Care Review Group. BMJ 317(7156):465–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Feder G, Griffiths C, Eldridge S, Spence M (1999) Effect of postal prompts to patients and general practitioners on the quality of primary care after a coronary event (POST): randomised controlled trial. BMJ 318(7197):1522–1526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Murray DM (1998) The design and analysis of group randomised trials. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Campbell MK, Mollison J, Steen N, Grimshaw JM, Eccles M (2000) Analysis of cluster randomized trials in primary care: a practical approach. Fam Pract 17(2):192–196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Campbell MK, Elbourne DR, Altman DG (2004) CONSORT statement: extension to cluster randomised trials. BMJ 328(7441):702–708PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Pande KC, de Takats D, Kanis JA, Edwards V, Slade P, McCloskey EV (2000) Development of a questionnaire (OPQ) to assess patient’s knowledge about osteoporosis. Maturitas 37(2):75–81PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Black DM, Steinbuch M, Palermo L, Dargent-Molina P, Lindsay R, Hoseyni MS et al (2001) An assessment tool for predicting fracture risk in postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 12(7):519–528PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cranney A, Brison R, Graham ID, Anastassiades T (2003) Management of older women with distal forearm fractures. J Rheumatology 30(8):1876Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Campbell MK, Fayers PM, Grimshaw JM (2005) Determinants of the intracluster correlation coefficient in cluster randomized trials: the case of implementation research. Clin Trials 2(2):99–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dickinson LM, Basu A (2005) Multilevel modeling and practice-based research. Ann Fam Med 3(Suppl 1):S52–S60PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Majumdar SR, Tsuyuki RT, McAlister FA (2007) Impact of opinion leader-endorsed evidence summaries on the quality of prescribing for patients with cardiovascular disease: a randomized controlled trial. Am Heart J 153(1):22–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Gignac MA, Jaglal SB, Dickson L, Hawker GA (2007) Minimal error in self-report of having had DXA, but self-report of its results was poor. J Clin Epidemiol 60(12):1306–1311PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Majumdar SR, Johnson JA, McAlister FA, Bellerose D, Russell AS, Hanley DA et al (2008) Multifaceted intervention to improve diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with recent wrist fracture: a randomized controlled trial. CMAJ 178(5):569–575PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Feldstein A, Elmer PJ, Smith DH, Herson M, Orwoll E, Chen C et al (2006) Electronic medical record reminder improves osteoporosis management after a fracture: a randomized, controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc 54(3):450–457PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, Johnson JA, Holroyd BH, Morrish DW et al (2004) A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 141(5):366–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Solomon DH, Polinski JM, Stedman M, Truppo C, Breiner L, Egan C et al (2007) Improving care of patients at-risk for osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. J Gen Intern Med 22(3):362–367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Majumdar SR (2008) Recent trends in osteoporosis treatment after hip fracture: improving but wholly inadequate. J Rheumatol 35(2):190–192PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Cadarette SM, Gignac MA, Jaglal SB, Beaton DE, Hawker GA (2007) Access to osteoporosis treatment is critically linked to access to dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry testing. Med Care 45(9):896–901PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Siris ES, Chen YT, Abbott TA, Barrett-Connor E, Miller PD, Wehren LE et al (2004) Bone mineral density thresholds for pharmacological intervention to prevent fractures. Arch Intern Med 164(10):1108–1112PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O, Oden A, Johansson H, McCloskey E (2008) FRAXtrade mark and the assessment of fracture probability in men and women from the UK. Osteoporos Int 19(4):385–397PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Cranney
    • 1
    • 10
  • M. Lam
    • 3
  • L. Ruhland
    • 5
  • R. Brison
    • 3
    • 4
  • M. Godwin
    • 9
  • M. M. Harrison
    • 6
  • M. B. Harrison
    • 7
  • T. Anastassiades
    • 5
    • 8
  • J. M. Grimshaw
    • 1
  • I. D. Graham
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Health Research Institute, and Department of MedicineUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Faculty of Health SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  3. 3.Departments of Medicine, Community Health and EpidemiologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  4. 4.Departments of Emergency Medicine and Family MedicineQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  5. 5.Department of MedicineQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  6. 6.Human Mobility Research Centre and Department of Orthopedic SurgeryQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  7. 7.School of NursingQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  8. 8.Human Mobility Research Centre and Division of RheumatologyQueen’s UniversityKingstonCanada
  9. 9.Primary Healthcare Research UnitMemorial UniversitySt John’sCanada
  10. 10.Clinical Epidemiology ProgramOttawa Health Research InstituteOttawaCanada

Personalised recommendations