The BPAQ: a bone-specific physical activity assessment instrument
- 1.3k Downloads
A newly developed bone-specific physical activity questionnaire (BPAQ) was compared with other common measures of physical activity for its ability to predict parameters of bone strength in healthy, young adults. The BPAQ predicted indices of bone strength at clinically relevant sites in both men and women, while other measures did not.
Only certain types of physical activity (PA) are notably osteogenic. Most methods to quantify levels of PA fail to account for bone relevant loading. Our aim was to examine the ability of several methods of PA assessment and a new bone-specific measure to predict parameters of bone strength in healthy adults.
We recruited 40 men and women (mean age 24.5). Subjects completed the modifiable activity questionnaire, Bouchard 3-day activity record, a recently published bone loading history questionnaire (BLHQ), and wore a pedometer for 14 days. We also administered our bone-specific physical activity questionnaire (BPAQ). Calcaneal broadband ultrasound attenuation (BUA) (QUS-2, Quidel) and densitometric measures (XR-36, Norland) were examined. Multiple regression and correlation analyses were performed on the data.
The current activity component of BPAQ was a significant predictor of variance in femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD), lumbar spine BMD, and whole body BMD (R2 = 0.36–0.68, p < 0.01) for men, while the past activity component of BPAQ predicted calcaneal BUA (R2 = 0.48, p = 0.001) for women.
The BPAQ predicted indices of bone strength at skeletal sites at risk of osteoporotic fracture while other PA measurement tools did not.
KeywordsBone mass Exercise Ground reaction force Pedometer
The authors would like to acknowledge the assistance of Dr Rod Barrett and Dr Justin Kavanagh in the data collection phase of the project. There were no external funding sources for this project.
Conflict of interest
- 21.Pluijm SM, Graafmans WC, Bouter LM et al. (1999) Ultrasound measurements for the prediction of osteoporotic fractures in elderly people. 9:550–556Google Scholar
- 22.Prins SH, Jorgensen HL, Jorgensen LV et al. (1998) The role of quantitative ultrasound in the assessment of bone: a review. 18:3–17Google Scholar
- 23.Wuster C, Hadji P (2001) Use of quantitative ultrasound densitometry (QUS) in male osteoporosis. 69:225–228Google Scholar
- 27.Hert J, Liskova M, Landa J (1971) Reaction of bone to mechanical stimuli. Part 1. Continuous and intermittent loading of tibia in rabbit. Folia Morphol 19:290–300Google Scholar