Osteoporosis International

, Volume 19, Issue 9, pp 1301–1306 | Cite as

Hip axis length variation: its correlation with anthropometric measurements in women from three ethnic groups

  • P. Clark
  • L. J. Tesoriero
  • D. J. Morton
  • J. O. Talavera
  • A. Karlamangla
  • D. L. Schneider
  • W. J. Wooten
  • E. Barrett-ConnorEmail author
Original Article



We compared hip axis length (HAL) in 157 non-Hispanic white women, 292 African-American women, and 210 Mexican-American women. After adjusting for maximal hip girth, there were no residual differences in HAL by ethnicity. Differences in hip fracture risk seen between these groups cannot be explained by ethnic differences in HAL.


Hip axis length (HAL) has been reported to be an independent predictor of hip fracture. Significant ethnic differences in HAL have been noted, but no direct comparison has been made between African-American, Mexican-American, and non-Hispanic white women using the same protocol.


We compared 157 non-Hispanic white women from the Rancho Bernardo Study, 292 women from the Health Assessment Study of African-American Women, and 210 women from the Skeletal Health of Mexican-American Women Project. A standardized questionnaire was used to obtain medical history; height, weight, waist girth, and hip girth were measured; and percentage body fat and HAL were obtained using dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. All HAL comparisons were adjusted for maximum hip girth to control for differences in size magnification by fan-beam absorptiometry.


Though there were ethnic differences in the unadjusted HAL measurement, after adjusting for hip circumference, there were no residual differences in HAL with regard to ethnicity: 10.7 cm in Mexican-American women vs. 10.8 in non-Hispanic white women and African-American women (p = 0.61).


There were no ethnic differences in HAL in women from the three ethnic groups. Differences in fracture risk among these groups cannot be explained by ethnic differences in HAL.


Ethnic differences Hip axis length Hip fracture Hip geometry Women 



Supported by National Institute on Aging, grant AG07181, and National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, grant DK31801.

Conflicts of interest



  1. 1.
    Faulkner KG, Cummings SR, Black D et al (1993) Simple measurement of femoral geometry predicts hip fracture: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 8:1211–1217PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cummings SR, Cauley JA, Palermo L (1994) Racial differences in hip axis lengths might explain racial differences in rates of hip fracture. Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group. Osteoporos Int 4:226–229PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Villa ML, Marcus R, Ramirez Delay R (1995) Factors contributing to skeletal health of postmenopausal Mexican-American women. J Bone Miner Res 10:1233–242PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boonen S, Koutri R, Dequeker J et al (1995) Measurement of femoral geometry in type I and type II osteoporosis: differences in hip axis length consistent with heterogeneity in the pathogenesis of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 10:1908–1912PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Peacock M, Turner CH, Liu G et al (1995) Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture. Osteoporos Int 5:167–173PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cummings SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 9:1065–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Crabtree N, Lunt M, Holt G et al (2000) Hip geometry, bone mineral distribution, and bone strength in European men and women: the EPOS study. Bone 27:151–159PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wang MC, Aguirre M, Bhudhikanok GS et al (1997) Bone mass and hip axis length in healthy Asian, black, Hispanic, and white American youths. J Bone Miner Res 12:1922–1935PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farmer ME, Harris T, Madans JH et al (1989) Anthropometric indicators and hip fracture. The NHANES I epidemiologic follow-up study. J Am Geriatr Soc 37:9–16PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Young JT, Carter K, Marion MS et al (2000) A simple method of computing hip axis length using fan-beam densitometry and anthropometric measurements. J Clin Densitom 3:325–331PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faulkner KG, Genant HK, McClung M (1995) Bilateral comparison of femoral bone density and hip axis length from single and fan beam DXA scans. Calcif Tissue Int 56:26–31PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Roux C, Kolta S, Fechtenbaum J et al (1997) Hip axis length measurement using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Rev Rhum Engl Ed 64:243–248PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Cheng XG, Nicholson PH, Boonen S et al (1997) Effects of anteversion on femoral bone mineral density and geometry measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: a cadaver study. Bone 21:113–117PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Pietrobelli A, Formica C, Wang Z et al (1996) Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry body composition model: review of physical concepts. Am J Physiol 271:E941–951PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    SAS Institute Inc. (1998) SAS/STAT User’s Guide RC. SAS Institute, Cary, NCGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mikhail MB, Vaswani AN, Aloia JF (1996) Racial differences in femoral dimensions and their relation to hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 6:22–24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Deleze M, Cons-Molina F, Villa AR et al (2000) Geographic differences in bone mineral density of Mexican women. Osteoporos Int 11:562–569PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Barrett-Connor E, Siris ES, Wehren LE et al (2005) Osteoporosis and fracture risk in women of different ethnic groups. J Bone Miner Res 20:185–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Clark P, Lavielle P, Franco-Marina F et al (2005) Incidence rates and life-time risk of hip fractures in Mexicans over 50 years of age: a population-based study. Osteoporos Int 16:2025–2030PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zingmond DS, Melton LJ III, Silverman SL (2004) Increasing hip fracture incidence in California Hispanics, 1983 to 2000. Osteoporos Int 15:603–610PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bauer R (1988) Ethnic differences in hip fracture: a reduced incidence in Mexican Americans. Am J Epidemiol 127:145–149PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kellie SE, Brody JA (1990) Sex-specific and race-specific hip fracture rates. Am J Public Health 80:326–328PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Silverman SL, Madison RE (1988) Decreased incidence of hip fracture in Hispanics, Asians, and blacks: California Hospital Discharge Data. Am J Public Health 78:1482–1483PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Farmer ME, White LR, Brody JA et al (1984) Race and sex differences in hip fracture incidence. Am J Public Health 74:1374–1380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kumanyika S (1987) Obesity in black women. Epidemiol Rev 9:31–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    DeSimone DP, Stevens J, Edwards J et al (1989) Influence of body habitus and race on bone mineral density of the midradius, hip, and spine in aging women. J Bone Miner Res 4:827–830PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Clark
    • 1
    • 3
  • L. J. Tesoriero
    • 3
  • D. J. Morton
    • 3
  • J. O. Talavera
    • 2
  • A. Karlamangla
    • 4
  • D. L. Schneider
    • 5
  • W. J. Wooten
    • 3
  • E. Barrett-Connor
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.Clinical Epidemiology Unit CMN Siglo XXI-IMSS, Faculty of MedicineUniversidad Nacional Autónoma de México UNAMMexico CityMexico
  2. 2.Clinical Epidemiology Unit CMN Siglo XXI-IMSS, Faculty of MedicineUniversidad Autónoma del Estado de MéxicoTolucaMexico
  3. 3.Department of Family and Preventive Medicine, School of MedicineUniversity of California, San DiegoLa JollaUSA
  4. 4.Division of GeriatricsUniversity of CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  5. 5.Department of MedicineUniversity of CaliforniaSan Diego, La JollaUSA

Personalised recommendations