Hip fractures in users of first- vs. second-generation bisphosphonates
- 84 Downloads
This study compared population hip fracture rates for women with a prior fragility fracture who were treated with first-generation versus second-generation bisphosphonate therapies. The observational study found that, relative to women treated with etidronate, a first-generation bisphosphonate, women treated with the second-generation therapies ‘alendronate’ or ‘risedronate’ were equally likely to be admitted to hospital for hip fracture. Our findings must be confirmed in large randomized head-to-head controlled trials.
Few studies have examined hip fracture outcomes among users of first- versus second-generation bisphosphonates. We compared hip fracture rates among elderly women with a history of fracture dispensed first- and second-generation bisphosphonates, hypothesizing that hip fracture rates would be higher among users of first- versus second-generation bisphosphonates after adjusting for confounders.
Administrative data from Ontario, Canada from 01 April 1998 to 31 March 2002 was used to identify population-based bisphosphonate-naïve cohorts of subjects age 66 years and older initiated on first- (etidronate plus calcium; n = 19,127) or second-generation (alendronate or risedronate; n = 1,460) bisphosphonates. Multivariate Cox proportional hazard models were used for analysis.
During over 23,000 person-years of follow-up, we observed 293 hospital admissions for first hip fracture. The unadjusted event rates yielded approximately 12.5 hospital admissions for hip fracture per 1,000 person-years of follow-up in each study group. Relative to the etidronate plus calcium group, females in the alendronate or risedronate group were equally likely to be admitted for hip fracture (adjusted rate ratio [aRR] = 1.0; 95% CI 0.6–1.6).
The findings of this study suggest similar rates of hip fracture between the first- and second-generation bisphosphonates when used continuously among elderly females with a prior history of fracture.
KeywordsBisphosphonates Hip fractures Observational cohort study Postmenopausal osteoporosis
- 6.North American Menopause Society (2002) Management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: position statement of The North American Menopause Society. Menopause 9:84–101Google Scholar
- 7.Goeree R, O’Brien B, Pettitt D et al (1996) An assessment of the burden of illness due to osteoporosis in Canada. J Soc Obstet Gynaecol Can 18(Suppl):15–24Google Scholar
- 8.Kanis KA (1993) Osteoporosis and its consequences. Osteoporosis. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, p 18Google Scholar
- 12.Harris ST, Watts NB, Genant HK et al (1999) Effects of risedronate treatment on vertebral and nonvertebral fractures in women with postmenopausal osteoporosis: a randomized controlled trial. Vertebral Efficacy with Risedronate Therapy (VERT) Study Group. JAMA 282:1344–1352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 15.Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA et al (1999) Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results of the FOSIT study. Foxamax International Trial Study Group. Osteoporos Int 9:461–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 16.Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care (2005) Ontario Drug Benefit Formulary / Comparative Drug Index No. 39. http://www.health.gov.on.ca/english/providers/program/drugs/formulary/ed39_0_bk.pdf