The care gap in diagnosis and treatment of women with a fragility fracture
In women aged 50 years or more who experienced a fracture, 81% suffered a fragility fracture. Six to eight months after fragility fracture, 79% had either not been investigated for osteoporosis or prescribed anti-fracture therapy. Despite fragility fractures being common in this population osteoporosis is under-diagnosed and under-treated.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and treatment rates for osteoporosis six months following fragility fracture.
This prospective cohort study was set in the general community from the Province of Quebec, Canada. Women at least 50 years of age who suffered a fracture were recruited during their initial visit to the hospital and had their fracture type classified as either fragility or traumatic. Six-to-eight months after fragility fracture, women were again contacted to evaluate the diagnostic and treatment rates of osteoporosis.
Of the 2,075 women recruited over a 25 month period 1688 (81%) sustained a fragility fracture and 387 (19%) sustained a traumatic fracture. Nine hundred and three participants with a fragility fracture were again contacted six-to-eight months after fracture. For the 739 women not on treatment on the recruitment day, only 15.4% initiated pharmacological therapy in the six-to-eight-month period following fracture and 79.0% had either not been investigated for osteoporosis or prescribed anti-fracture treatment.
The proportion of fragility fractures to total fractures is higher than previously reported. Despite the availability of diagnostic modalities, effective treatments, and adequate health care assessments, there is a substantial care gap in the management of osteoporosis.
KeywordsCare gap Diagnosis Fragility fracture Osteoporosis Treatment
We gratefully acknowledge the contributions of the ROCQ programme staff, particularly programme coordinators Nathalie Migneault and Lucie Vaillancourt and administrative assistant Julie Parrot. We also acknowledge the contributions of the regional coordinators and research assistants: Sylvie Bélanger, Geneviève Corneau, Isabel Lajeunesse, Pierre-Antoine Landry, Lise Lemire, Anne-Marie Louis XVI, Julie Simard, and Lyse Roy.
Finally, we thank the regional directors, Pierre Dagenais, Kim Latendresse, Pierre Major, Frédéric Morin, Suzanne Morin, and Josée Villeneuve, for their support during the implementation of the programme and their ciritical scientific advice. We also thank past members of the ROCQ executive, Louise Lafortune, Christine Chin, Luc Sauriol, and Andy McClenaghan, for their insightful guidance.
The Recognizing Osteoporosis and its Consequences in Quebec (ROCQ) Programme is funded by Merck Frosst Canada, Inc., Procter and Gamble Pharmaceuticals, sanofi-aventis group, Eli Lilly Canada, Inc., and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Canada, Inc.
- 3.Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fracture. Can Med Assoc J 163:819–822Google Scholar
- 10.Kreiger N, Tenenhouse A, Joseph L et al (1999) The Canadian multicentre osteoporosis study (CaMos): background, rationale, methods. Canadian Journal of Aging 18:376–387Google Scholar
- 15.Maricic M, Adachi J, Meunier P et al (2000) Raloxifene 60 mg/day has effects within 12 months in postmenopausal osteoporosis treatment and prevention studies. Arthritis Rheum 9(suppl):S197Google Scholar
- 17.Pols HA, Felsenberg D, Hanley DA et al (1999) Multinational, placebo-controlled, randomized trial of the effects of alendronate on bone density and fracture risk in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: results of the FOSIT study. Fosamax International Trial Study Group. Osteoporos Int 9:461–468PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Brown JP Jr (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. Can Med Assoc J 167:S1–S36Google Scholar