Outdoor air pollution and bone mineral density in elderly men - the Oslo Health Study
- 267 Downloads
The association between bone mineral density (BMD) and outdoor air pollution has not previously been explored. In this study including 590 elderly men, total body BMD was inversely associated with indicators of air pollution. Further studies to address any relation between air pollution and BMD and bone fracture are warranted.
The relation between air pollution and bone mineral density (BMD) is unknown. Based on higher fracture rates and more osteoporosis in urban compared to rural populations, this exploratory study aimed at investigating the association between indicators of air pollution and BMD.
In an osteoporosis sub-study of the population-based Oslo Health Study (2000–2001) BMD of total body and total hip (mg/cm2) was measured by DXA in 590 men 75–76 years old. Exposure to air pollution (particulate matter (PM10 and PM2.5) and nitrogen dioxide (NO2)) at each participant’s home address was estimated from 1992 to 2001.
Air pollution was inversely associated with total body BMD, whereas no significant association was found for total hip BMD. The adjusted odds ratio (OR) [95% confidence interval] for low total body BMD (Z-score ≤−1) was per standard deviation increase 1.33 [1.05–1.70] for PM2.5, 1.28 [1.00–1.63] for PM10, and 1.24 [0.97–1.59] for NO2. Stratified by smoking status the adjusted OR for PM2.5 was 1.73 [1.02–2.95] in current smokers, 1.40 [1.03–1.90] in former smokers and 0.83 [0.43–1.58] in non-smokers.
There was a weak but statistically significant inverse association between indicators of air pollution and total body BMD. Further investigations are warranted.
KeywordsAir pollution Bone mineral density DXA Epidemiology Heavy metals Population study
The data collection was conducted as part of the Oslo Health Study 2000–2001 in collaboration with the National Health Screening Service of Norway (now the Norwegian Institute of Public Health). The Osteoporosis sub-study was funded by the Norwegian Research Council. The Norwegian Osteoporosis Foundation funded the writing of this manuscript.
Conflict of interest statement
All authors have no conflicts of interest.
- 1.Downs S, Forastiere F, Forsberg B et al (2006) Air pollution and the risks to human health - Epidemiology. Available at: http://airnet.iras.uu.nl/, University of Maastricht, Netherlands. Accessed November 15, 2006
- 2.Particulate matter air pollution: how it harms health (2005) Fact sheet EURO/04/05,World Health Organisation Europe. Berlin, Copenhagen, Rome. Available at: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs187/en/. Accessed November 15, 2006
- 3.World Health Organization (2006) WHO Air quality guidelines for particulate matter, ozone, nitrogen dioxide and sulfur dioxide. Global update 2005. WHO Geneva, Switzerland. Available at: http://www.who.int/phe/air/aqg2006execsum.pdf. Accessed November 15, 2006
- 15.Walker S (2004) Calculation of NO2, PM10 and PM2.5 in Oslo for the HUBRO health study (Norwegian). Ordered report nr 75. Norwegian Institute of Air Research, Oslo, Norway. Available at: http://www.nilu.no/data/inc/leverfil.cfm?id=9609&type=6, Accessed November 15, 2006
- 16.McInnes H (2004) Calculations of air quality in Oslo for the years 1992 to 2002 (Norwegian). Technical report nr 8. Norwegian Institute of Air Research, Oslo, Norway. Available at: http://www.nilu.no/data/inc/leverfil.cfm?id=8053&type=6. Accessed November 15, 2006
- 17.Oftedal B, Walker S, Gram F et al (2007) Modelling long-term averages of local ambient air pollution in Oslo, Norway: evaluation of nitrogen dioxide, PM10 and PM2. International Journal of Environment and Pollution (In press)Google Scholar
- 18.Lutzenkichen S, Lutnæs G (2005) Air quality in Oslo - status 2005 (Norwegian). Oslo Municipality, Department of Health and Welfare. Available at: http://www.helse-og-velferdsetaten.oslo.kommune.no. Accessed November 15, 2006