Prediction of bone loss using biochemical markers of bone turnover
- 256 Downloads
The association between baseline levels of eleven bone turnover markers and 5-year rate of bone density change was prospectively studied in a population-based sample of 601 75-year-old women. Several bone formation and resorption markers as well as urinary osteocalcin were modestly correlated to rate of bone density change.
Prediction of bone loss by bone turnover markers (BTMs) has been investigated with conflicting results. There is limited information in the elderly.
Eleven bone turnover markers were analyzed in 75-year old women in the OPRA study (n = 601) and compared to the 5-year change of areal bone mineral density (aBMD) in seven skeletal regions.
Annual aBMD change varied between +0.4% (spine) and −2.0% (femoral neck). Significant associations (p < 0.01) were found for four different serum osteocalcins (S-OCs) (standardized regression coefficient −0.20 to −0.22), urinary deoxypyridinoline (−0.19), serum TRACP5b (−0.19), serum CTX-I (−0.21), two of the three urinary osteocalcins (U-OCs) (−0.16) and aBMD change of the leg region (derived from the total body measurement). After adjustment for baseline aBMD, associations were found for all S-OCs (−0.11 to −0.16), two of the three U-OCs (−0.14 to −0.16) and aBMD change at the total hip, and for three of the four S-OCs (−0.14 to −0.15), S-TRACP5b (−0.11), two of the three U-OCs (−0.14 to −0.15) and aBMD change at the femoral neck. There were no significant results concerning aBMD change at the spine.
This study indicates that BTMs are correlated with aBMD loss in some skeletal regions in elderly women.
KeywordsBone density Bone loss Bone turnover markers Elderly
Financial support was received from the Swedish Medical Research Council, Malmö University Hospital Funds, and the Greta and Johan Kock Foundation.
Conflict of interest statement
None of the authors has a conflict of interest.
- 1.Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, Johansson H, De Laet C, Delmas P, Eisman JA, Fujiwara S, Kroger H, Mellstrom D, Meunier PJ, Melton LJ 3rd, O’Neill T, Pols H, Reeve J, Silman A, Tenenhouse A (2005) Predictive value of BMD for hip and other fractures. J Bone Miner Res 20:1185–1194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Marcus R, Holloway L, Wells B, Greendale G, James MK, Wasilauskas C, Kelaghan J (1999) The relationship of biochemical markers of bone turnover to bone density changes in postmenopausal women: results from the Postmenopausal Estrogen/Progestin Interventions (PEPI) trial. J Bone Miner Res 14:1583–1595PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 13.Bauer DC, Sklarin PM, Stone KL, Black DM, Nevitt MC, Ensrud KE, Arnaud CD, Genant HK, Garnero P, Delmas PD, Lawaetz H, Cummings SR (1999) Biochemical markers of bone turnover and prediction of hip bone loss in older women: the study of osteoporotic fractures. J Bone Miner Res 14:1404–1410PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Hellman J, Kakonen SM, Matikainen MT, Karp M, Lovgren T, Vaananen HK, Pettersson K (1996) Epitope mapping of nine monoclonal antibodies against osteocalcin: combinations into two-site assays affect both assay specificity and sample stability. J Bone Miner Res 11:1165–1175PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 33.Iki M, Morita A, Ikeda Y, Sato Y, Akiba T, Matsumoto T, Nishino H, Kagamimori S, Kagawa Y, Yoneshima H (2006) Biochemical markers of bone turnover predict bone loss in perimenopausal women but not in postmenopausal women-the Japanese Population-based Osteoporosis (JPOS) Cohort Study. Osteoporos Int 17:1086–1095PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar