Osteoporosis International

, Volume 18, Issue 8, pp 1127–1136 | Cite as

A program with a dedicated coordinator improved chart documentation of osteoporosis after fragility fracture

  • S. E. Ward
  • J. J. Laughren
  • B. G. Escott
  • V. Elliot-Gibson
  • E. R. Bogoch
  • D. E. Beaton
Original Article



Post-fracture osteoporosis care is becoming recognized as essential by the orthopaedic community, but programs and systems are needed to ensure that this care is routinely provided. Chart documentation related to OP, which is valuable for continuity of care, increased significantly following establishment of an osteoporosis program with a dedicated coordinator.


Post-fracture osteoporosis (OP) care has been repeatedly reported to be inadequate. Through a coordinator-based program, we addressed OP care for more than 95% of fragility fracture patients (1), but we do not know if documentation by orthopaedic surgeons improved. The literature suggests that chart documentation, though underestimating true care, is an indicator of the salient aspects of a condition. Thus chart documentation could be used to reflect an emerging recognition of OP as an important issue to be addressed in the orthopaedic management of the fragility fracture. The purpose of this study was to evaluate if there was an increased documentation of OP by orthopaedic surgeons before and after introduction of a coordinator-based program where the coordinator was known to address OP in 95% of cases.


Chart audits were conducted to quantify OP documentation for patients treated after program initiation compared with age-, sex-, and fracture type-matched controls who presented prior to program implementation. Documentation rates were compared using χ2 tests. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to identify patient characteristics associated with OP-related documentation.


After program implementation, chart documentation of OP diagnosis (unadjusted OR 2.2, 95% CI 1.1–4.4), of referral for OP follow-up (unadjusted OR 3.1, 95% CI 1.5–6.1), and of initiation of OP management (unadjusted OR 8.2, 95% CI 4.0–16.5) by orthopaedic surgeons was more likely. Being in the post-implementation group was stronger than any patient factors in predicting OP charting.


Physicians working in a clinic with a coordinator-based OP program were more likely to document OP-related care in patients’ medical charts. We believe this in turn reflected increased attention to OP by physicians in the orthopaedic management of fragility fractures.


Chart documentation Fragility fracture Orthopaedic surgeons Osteoporosis 



The Osteoporosis Exemplary Care Program was funded by an unrestricted program grant provided by Merck Frosst Canada and Co. Ms. Ward was supported by the St. Michael’s Hospital Orthopaedics Research Education Fund. Mr. Laughren was supported by a Summer Student Research Scholarship from the Faculty of Medicine at the University of Toronto. Dr. Beaton is supported by a New Investigators Award, from the Canadian Institute of Health Research.


  1. 1.
    Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment for patients with a fragility fracture in an orthopaedic environment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:25–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chrischilles EA, Dasbach EJ, Rubenstein LM, Cook JR, Tabor HK, Black DM (2001) The effect of alendronate on fracture-related healthcare utilization and costs: the fracture intervention trial. Osteoporos Int 12:654–660PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Johnell O, Jonsson B, Jonsson L, Black D (2003) Cost effectiveness of alendronate (fosamax) for the treatment of osteoporosis and prevention of fractures. Pharmacoeconomics 21:305–314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Watts NB (2003) Bisphosphonate treatment of osteoporosis. Clin Geriatr Med 19:395–414PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Larsen ER, Mosekilde L, Foldspang A (2004) Vitamin D and calcium supplementation prevents osteoporotic fractures in elderly community dwelling residents: a pragmatic population-based 3-year intervention study. J Bone Miner Res 19:370–378PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Mathoo JM, Cranney A, Papaioannou A, Adachi JD (2004) Rational use of oral bisphosphonates for the treatment of osteoporosis. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2:17–23PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Stevenson M, Lloyd JM, De Nigris E, Brewer N, Davis S, Oakley J (2005) A systematic review and economic evaluation of alendronate, etidronate, risedronate, raloxifene and teriparatide for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis. Health Technol Assess 9:1–160PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton DE (2004) Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 15:767–778PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Castel H, Bonneh DY, Sherf M, Liel Y (2001) Awareness of osteoporosis and compliance with management guidelines in patients with newly diagnosed low-impact fractures. Osteoporos Int 12:559–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cuddihy MT, Gabriel SE, Crowson CS, Atkinson EJ, Tabini C, O’Fallon WM et al (2002) Osteoporosis intervention following distal forearm fractures: a missed opportunity? Arch Intern Med 162:421–426PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. CMAJ 163:819–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Papaioannou A, Giangregorio L, Kvern B, Boulos P, Ioannidis G, Adachi JD (2004) The osteoporosis care gap in Canada. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 5:11PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chami G, Jeys L, Freudmann M, Connor L, Siddiqi M (2006) Are osteoporotic fractures being adequately investigated? A questionnaire of GP and orthopaedic surgeons. BMC Fam Pract 7:7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Giangregorio L, Papaioannou A, Cranney A, Zytaruk N, Adachi JD (2006) Fragility fractures and the osteoporosis care gap: an international phenomenon. Semin Arthritis Rheum 35:293–305PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Sander B, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Bogoch ER, Maetzel A (2006) The economics of targeting fragility fractures in an orthopedic treatment unit. Osteoporosis International 17(Suppl 2)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Luck J, Peabody JW, Dresselhaus TR, Lee M, Glassman P (2000) How well does chart abstraction measure quality? A prospective comparison of standardized patients with the medical record. Am J Med 108:642–649PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tisnado DM, Adams JL, Liu H, Damberg CL, Chen WP, Hu FA et al (2006) What is the concordance between the medical record and patient self-report as data sources for ambulatory care? Med Care 44:132–140PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McDermott MF, Lenhardt RO, Catrambone CD, Walter J, Weiss KB (2006) Adequacy of medical chart review to characterize emergency care for asthma: findings from the Illinois Emergency Department Asthma Collaborative. Acad Emerg Med 13:345–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soto CM, Kleinman KP, Simon SR (2002) Quality and correlates of medical record documentation in the ambulatory care setting. BMC Health Serv Res 2:22PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Stange KC, Zyzanski SJ, Smith TF, Kelly R, Langa DM, Flocke SA et al (1998) How valid are medical records and patient questionnaires for physician profiling and health services research? A comparison with direct observation of patients visits. Med Care 36:851–867PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hawker G, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal S, Bogoch E (2003) The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 14:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    WHO Scientific Group on the Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis (2003) Prevention and Management of Osteoporosis Geneva, Switzerland, World Health Organization. WHO Technical Report SeriesGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S (1989) Applied logistic regression. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Harrell FE Jr (2001) Regression modeling strategies. Springer-Verlag, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ashe MC, McKay HA, Janssen P, Guy P, Khan KM (2005) Improving osteoporosis management in at-risk fracture clinic patients. J Am Geriatr Soc 53:727–728PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Chevalley T, Hoffmeyer P, Bonjour JP, Rizzoli R (2002) An osteoporosis clinical pathway for the medical management of patients with low-trauma fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:450–455PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    McLellan AR, Gallacher SJ, Fraser M, McQuillian C (2003) The fracture liaison service: success of a program for the evaluation and management of patients with osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 14:1028–1034PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Rethans JJ, Martin E, Metsemakers J (1994) To what extent do clinical notes by general practitioners reflect actual medical performance? A study using simulated patients. Br J Gen Pract 44:153–156PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Spies TH, Mokkink HG, De Vries Robbe PF, Grol RP (2004) Which data source in clinical performance assessment? A pilot study comparing self-recording with patient records and observation. Int J Qual Health Care 16:65–72PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2007

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. E. Ward
    • 1
    • 2
  • J. J. Laughren
    • 1
    • 2
  • B. G. Escott
    • 1
  • V. Elliot-Gibson
    • 1
  • E. R. Bogoch
    • 1
    • 3
  • D. E. Beaton
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Mobility Program Clinical Research UnitSt. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  2. 2.University of TorontoTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Department of SurgerySt. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations