Psychometric properties of the “Osteoporosis and You” questionnaire: osteoporosis knowledge deficits among older community-dwelling women
- 192 Downloads
In older women, knowledge about risk factors for osteoporosis was good, with over 75% responding correctly to questions about lifestyle factors, family history, height loss, and menopausal status. However, significant knowledge deficits were identified regarding osteoporosis “consequences” and “prevention and treatment.”
We examined osteoporosis knowledge by testing the psychometric properties of the 10-item knowledge component of the “Osteoporosis and You” questionnaire. Several knowledge domains were hypothesized.
Community-dwelling women aged 65–90 years residing within two regions of Ontario, Canada were studied (N = 869). Data were collected by standardized telephone interviews in 2003 and 2004. Items to which 75% or more responded correctly were identified as having a low index of difficulty; the remaining items identified areas of knowledge deficit. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to test scale structure.
Six of the ten items had a low index of difficulty. These items largely examined osteoporosis risk factors. The remaining four items identified significant knowledge deficits in the areas of osteoporosis consequences, prevention, and treatment. Confirmatory factor analysis identified four distinct osteoporosis knowledge domains. However, the internal consistency was low for all but one domain, which examined “prevention and treatment.”
Although older women appear to be aware of osteoporosis risk factors, knowledge deficits regarding the consequences of osteoporosis and that treatment exists to prevent bone loss were identified. Better understanding of the multi-dimensional aspects of osteoporosis knowledge may help to inform the development of effective educational interventions.
KeywordsFactor analysis, Statistical Knowledge Osteoporosis
- 2.Glanz K, Rimer BK, Lewis FM (2002) Health behavior and health education: theory, research, and practice. Jossey-Bass, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
- 4.Brenneman SK, Blau EM, Chen Y et al (2002) Validation of a patient questionnaire, ‘Osteoporosis and You’, designed to assess osteoporosis-related attitudes, knowledge and behavior [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 17 [Suppl 1]:S466Google Scholar
- 7.Cadarette SM, Beaton DE, Gignac MAM et al (2006) Inequities in access to osteoporosis investigation and treatment among older community-dwelling women in Ontario, Canada [abstract]. J Bone Miner Res 21 [Suppl 1]:S273Google Scholar
- 9.Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Health Belief Scale. Grand Valley State University, AllendaleGoogle Scholar
- 11.Kim K, Horan M, Gendler P (1991) Osteoporosis Knowledge Test. Grand Valley State University, AllendaleGoogle Scholar
- 13.Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH (1994) Psychometric theory. McGraw-Hill, TorontoGoogle Scholar
- 14.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (1981–2005) PRELIS. Scientific Software International, LincolnwoodGoogle Scholar
- 15.Hair JF, Anderson RE, Tatham RL et al (1998) Multivariate data analysis. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
- 16.Jöreskog KG, Sörbom D (2005) LISREL. Scientific Software International, LincolnwoodGoogle Scholar
- 17.Hatcher L (1994) A step-by-step approach to using the SAS System for factor analysis and structural equation modeling. SAS Institute, CaryGoogle Scholar
- 18.Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- 19.DeVellis RF (2003) Scale development: theory and applications. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
- 23.Statistics Canada (1999) Health among older adults. Health Rep 11:47–61Google Scholar
- 24.Statistics Canada (2002) 2001 Community profiles. Statistics Canada catalogue No. 93F0053XIE. http://www12.statcan.ca/english/Profil01/CP01/Index.cfm?Lang=E