Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 12, pp 1815–1819 | Cite as

Vertebral height restoration in osteoporotic compression fractures: kyphoplasty balloon tamp is superior to postural correction alone

  • M. K. Shindle
  • M. J. Gardner
  • J. Koob
  • S. Bukata
  • J. A. Cabin
  • J. M. Lane
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Kyphoplasty has been shown to restore vertebral height and sagittal alignment. Proponents of vertebroplasty have recently demonstrated that many vertebral compression fractures (VCFs) are mobile and positional correction can lead to clinically significant height restoration. The current investigation tested the hypothesis that positional maneuvers do not achieve the same degree of vertebral height correction as kyphoplasty balloon tamps for the reduction of low-energy VCFs.

Methods

Twenty-five consecutive patients with a total of 43 osteoporotic VCFs were entered into a prospective analysis. Each patient was sequentially evaluated for postural and balloon vertebral fracture reduction. Preoperative standing and lateral radiographs of the fractured vertebrae were compared with prone cross-table lateral radiographs with the patient in a hyper-extension position and on pelvic and sternal rolls. Following positional manipulation, patients underwent a unilateral balloon kyphoplasty. Postoperative standing radiographs were evaluated for the percentage of height restoration related to positioning and balloon kyphoplasty.

Results

In the middle portion of the vertebrae, the percentage available for restoration restored with extension positioning was 10.4% (median 11.1%) and after balloon kyphoplasty was 57.0% (median 62.2%). This difference was statistically significant (p<0.001). Thus, kyphoplasty provided an additional 46.6% of the height available for restoration from the positioning alone. With operative positioning, 51.2% of VCFs had >10% restoration of the central portion of the vertebral body, whereas 90.7% of fractures improved at least 10% following balloon kyphoplasty (p<0.002).

Conclusion

Although this study supports the concept that many VCFs can be moved with positioning, balloon kyphoplasty enhanced the height reduction >4.5-fold over the positioning maneuver alone and accounted for over 80% of the ultimate reduction. If height restoration is the goal, kyphoplasty is clearly superior in most cases to the positioning maneuver alone.

Keywords

Balloon kyphoplasty Extension positioning Osteoporosis Vertebral compression fractures 

References

  1. 1.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314(26):1676–1686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ 3rd (1995) The worldwide problem of osteoporosis: Insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 17(5 Suppl):505S–511SPubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK (2001) Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporosis Int 12(6):429–437CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, Pieper CF, Martinez S, Mulhausen PL (1993) Association of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med 94(6):595–601PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crandall D, Slaughter D, Hankins PJ, Moore C, Jerman J (2004) Acute versus chronic vertebral compression fractures treated with kyphoplasty: early results. Spine J 4(4):418–424PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Evans AJ, Jensen ME, Kip KE, DeNardo AJ, Lawler GJ, Negin GA, Remley KB, Boutin SM, Dunnagan SA (2003) Vertebral compression fractures: pain reduction and improvement in functional mobility after percutaneous polymethylmethacrylate vertebroplasty—retrospective report of 245 cases. Radiology 226(2):366–372PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mathis JM, Barr JD, Belkoff SM, Barr MS, Jensen ME, Deramond H (2001) Percutaneous vertebroplasty: a developing standard of care for vertebral compression fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 22(2):371–381Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mathis JM, Ortiz AO, Zoarski GH (2004) Vertebroplasty versus kyphoplasty: a comparison and contrast. Am J Neuroradiol 25(5):840–845PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Phillips FM, Ho E, Campbell-Hupp M, McNally T, Todd Wetzel F, Gupta P (2003) Early radiographic and clinical results of balloon kyphoplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 28(19):2260–2267PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lieberman IH, Dudeney S, Reinhardt MK, Bell G (2001) Initial outcome and efficacy of “kyphoplasty” in the treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Spine 26(14):1631–1638PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lieberman I, Reinhardt MK (2003) Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for osteolytic vertebral collapse. Clin Orthop 415(Suppl):S176–S186PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Barr JD, Barr MS, Lemley TJ, McCann RM (2000) Percutaneous vertebroplasty for pain relief and spinal stabilization. Spine 25(8):923–928PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Belmont PJ Jr, Plly DW Jr, Cunningham BW, Klemme WR (2001) The effects of hook pattern and kyphotic angulation on mechanical strength and apical rod strain in a long-segment posterior construct using a synthetic model. Spine 26(6):627–635PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    White AA 3rd, Panjabi MM, Thomas CL (1977) The clinical biomechanics of kyphotic deformities. Clin Orthop 128:8–17PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Ledlie JT, Renfro M (2003) Balloon kyphoplasty: one-year outcomes in vertebral body height restoration, chronic pain, and activity levels. J Neurosurg 98(1 Suppl):36–42PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Dudeney S, Lieberman IH, Reinhardt MK, Hussein M (2002) Kyphoplasty in the treatment of osteolytic vertebral compression fractures as a result of multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol 20(9):2382–2387PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rhyne A 3rd, Banit D, Laxer E, Odum S, Nussman D (2004) Kyphoplasty: report of eighty-two thoracolumbar osteoporotic vertebral fractures. J Orthop Trauma 18(5):294–299PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    McKiernan F, Jensen R, Faciszewski T (2003) The dynamic mobility of vertebral compression fractures. J Bone Miner Res 18(1):24–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Faciszewski T, McKiernan F (2002) Calling all vertebral fractures classification of vertebral compression fractures: a consensus for comparison of treatment and outcome. J Bone Miner Res 17(2):185–191PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    McKiernan F, Faciszewski T, Jensen R (2003) Reporting height restoration in vertebral compression fractures. Spine 28(22):2517–2521PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, Levine AM, Belkoff SM (1999) Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 24(17):1772–1776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Steinmann J, Tingey CT, Cruz G, Dai Q (2005) Biomechanical comparison of unipedicular versus bipedicular kyphoplasty. Spine 30(2):201–205PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • M. K. Shindle
    • 1
  • M. J. Gardner
    • 1
  • J. Koob
    • 1
  • S. Bukata
    • 2
  • J. A. Cabin
    • 1
  • J. M. Lane
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryHospital for Special SurgeryNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of RochesterRochesterUSA

Personalised recommendations