Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 11, pp 1666–1672 | Cite as

Young patients with hip fracture: a population-based study of bone mass and risk factors for osteoporosis

  • C. M. Lofthus
  • E. K. Osnes
  • H. E. Meyer
  • I. S. Kristiansen
  • L. Nordsletten
  • J. A. Falch
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Hip fracture in young patients is rare. The present study was aimed to clarify the comorbidity pattern and reveal relevant risk factors for osteoporosis and fracture in this patient group.

Materials and methods

Using electronic diagnosis registers and lists of the operating theatres for the Oslo hospitals, patients with new hip fracture during two 1-year periods from May 1994 through April 1995 and from May 1996 through April 1997 were identified. All patients age 20–49 years at the time of fracture were included (n=49), and a detailed medical history was recorded. Thirty-two of the patients volunteered for examination and completed a questionnaire and interview to reveal risk factors for osteoporosis. Data from the Oslo Health Study served as reference material. Bone mineral density (BMD) was measured using dual x-ray absorptiometry, and Z-scores were calculated using healthy subjects from Oslo as reference.

Results

Of the patients identified, the median age was 40 years (range 25–49), and 63% were men. In 65% of the patients, the fracture occurred after a fall at the same level, in 16% it occurred after a fall from a higher level, and in 18% it occurred in a traffic accident. Twenty percent of the patients had a history of alcohol or drug abuse, 39% had neuromuscular diseases, and 12% had endocrine diseases. The patients examined had significantly more risk factors for osteoporosis than the reference population. The BMD expressed as Z-score for L2-4 was −1.0±0.9 (mean ± SD; p<0.001), for femoral neck was −1.5±1.0 (p<0.001), and for total body was −1.3±1.1 (p<0.001). BMD was significantly lower than in controls for patients sustaining low-energy and high-energy trauma. There was a negative correlation between the total number of risk factors and BMD for lumbar spine (r=−0.35, p<0.05), femoral neck (r=−0.37, p=0.04), and total body (r=−0.55, p=0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

The majority of the young patients with hip fracture have a history of low-energy trauma, comorbidity predisposing for falls or decreased bone strength, as well as several risk factors for osteoporosis. The BMD was significantly lower than in the reference population regardless of the trauma mechanism.

Keywords

Bone mineral density Hip fracture Osteoporosis Risk factors Trauma mechanism Young patients 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This project was financially supported by grants from the “EXTRA funds” of the Norwegian Foundation for Health and Rehabilitation and by an unrestricted grant from Eli Lilly, Norway.

References

  1. 1.
    Cummings SR, Melton LJ (2002) Epidemiology and outcomes of osteoporotic fractures. Lancet 359:1761–1767PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Johnell O, Kanis J (2005) Epidemiology of osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 16:S3–S7PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Braithwaite RS, Col NF, Wong JB (2003) Estimating hip fracture morbidity, mortality and costs. J Am Geriatr Soc 51:364–370PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lofthus CM, Osnes EK, Falch JA et al (2001) Epidemiology of hip fractures in Oslo, Norway. Bone 29:413–418PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Robinson CM, Court-Brown CM, McQueen MM et al (1995) Hip fractures in adults younger than 50 years of age. Epidemiology and results. Clin Orthop Relat Res 312:238–246PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Askin SR, Bryan RS (1976) Femoral neck fractures in young adults. Clin Orthop Relat Res 114:259–264PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Verettas DA, Galanis B, Kazakos K et al (2002) Fractures of the proximal part of the femur in patients under 50 years of age. Injury 33:41–45PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Swiontkowski MF, Winquist RA, Hansen ST Jr (1984) Fractures of the femoral neck in patients between the ages of twelve and forty-nine years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:837–846PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zetterberg CH, Irstam L, Andersson GB (1982) Femoral neck fractures in young adults. Acta Orthop Scand 53:427–435PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Boden SD, Labropoulos P, Saunders R (1990) Hip fractures in young patients: is this early osteoporosis? Calcif Tissue Int 46:65–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Espallargues M, Sampietro-Colom L, Estrada MD et al (2001) Identifying bone-mass-related risk factors for fracture to guide bone densitometry measurements: a systematic review of the literature. Osteoporos Int 12:811–822PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lau EM, Cooper C (2001) Risk factors for osteoporosis in Europe. J Bone Miner Metab 19:142–145PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Wehren LE, Magaziner J (2003) Hip fracture: risk factors and outcomes. Curr Osteoporos Rep 1:78–85PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lofthus CM, Cappelen I, Osnes EK et al (2005) Local and national electronic databases in Norway demonstrate a varying degree of validity. J Clin Epidemiol 58:280–285PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    National Council for Nutrition, Norwegian Food Safety Authority, Department of Nutrition - University of Oslo (2001) The Norwegian food composition table. Gyldendal, OsloGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Søgaard AJ, Selmer R, Bjertness E et al (2004) The Oslo Health Study: the impact of self-selection in a large, population-based survey. Int J Equity Health 3:3Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Falch JA, Meyer HE (1996) [Bone mineral density measured by dual X-ray absorptiometry. A reference material from Oslo]. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen 116:2299–2302PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dennison E, Cole Z, Cooper C (2005) Diagnosis and epidemiology of osteoporosis. Curr Opin Rheumatol 17:456–461PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dubey A, Koval KJ, Zuckerman JD (1999) Hip fracture epidemiology: a review. Am J Orthop 28:497–506PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Khosla S, Lufkin EG, Hodgson SF et al (1994) Epidemiology and clinical features of osteoporosis in young individuals. Bone 15:551–555PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tooke SM, Favero KJ (1985) Femoral neck fractures in skeletally mature patients, fifty years old or less. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67:1255–1260PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Courtney AC, Wachtel EF, Myers ER et al (1995) Age-related reductions in the strength of the femur tested in a fall-loading configuration. J Bone Joint Surg Am 77:387–395PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Cumming RG, Nevitt MC, Cummings SR (1997) Epidemiology of hip fractures. Epidemiol Rev 19:244–257PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Meyer HE, Henriksen C, Falch JA et al (1995) Risk factors for hip fracture in a high incidence area: a case-control study from Oslo, Norway. Osteoporos Int 5:239–246PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    McGuigan FE, Murray L, Gallagher A et al (2002) Genetic and environmental determinants of peak bone mass in young men and women. J Bone Miner Res 17:1273–1279PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Wallace LS, Ballard JE (2002) Lifetime physical activity and calcium intake related to bone density in young women. J Womens Health Gend Based Med 11:389–398PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    WHO Study Group (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO Technical Report Series 843:1–129Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Writing Group for the ISCD Position Development Conference (2004) Diagnosis of osteoporosis in men, premenopausal women, and children. J Clin Densitom 7:17–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Olszynski WP, Shawn DK, Adachi JD et al (2004) Osteoporosis in men: epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment. Clin Ther 26:15–28PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Lombardi A, Ross PD (2001) The assessment of bone mass in men. Calcif Tissue Int 69:222–224PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Leib ES (2005) Treatment of low bone mass in premenopausal women: when may it be appropriate? Curr Osteoporos Rep 3:13–18PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Rubin MR, Schussheim DH, Kulak CA et al (2005) Idiopathic osteoporosis in premenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 16:526–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM (2002) Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. JAMA 288:1889–1897PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Wehren LE, Siris ES (2004) Beyond bone mineral density: can existing clinical risk assessment instruments identify women at increased risk of osteoporosis? J Intern Med 256:375–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • C. M. Lofthus
    • 1
  • E. K. Osnes
    • 2
  • H. E. Meyer
    • 3
    • 4
  • I. S. Kristiansen
    • 5
    • 6
  • L. Nordsletten
    • 2
  • J. A. Falch
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre of EndocrinologyAker University Hospital and University of OsloOsloNorway
  2. 2.Orthopaedic CentreUllevål University Hospital and University of OsloOsloNorway
  3. 3.Division of Epidemiology Norwegian Institute of Public HealthOsloNorway
  4. 4.Department of General Practice and Community MedicineUniversity of OsloOsloNorway
  5. 5.Institute of Public HealthUniversity of Southern DenmarkOdenseDenmark
  6. 6.Institute of Health Management and Health EconomicsUniversity of OsloOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations