The role of socioeconomic status on hip fracture
- 203 Downloads
The impact of socioeconomic status—income and acculturation—on hip fracture is not well understood. We studied 116,919 fractures among 8,144,469 people in California. Greater income and English fluency predict lower fracture incidence. Lower income and immigrant populations are at increased risk for hip fracture and require intervention. Race/ethnicity is a major determinant of hip fracture risk. Although socioeconomic status (e.g., income and acculturation) is often associated with race/ethnicity, its impact on hip fracture incidence is less well understood.
We carried out a retrospective, population-based, study of persons with hip fractures in California, 1996 to 2000, compared to census estimates by zip code. We performed Poisson regression analyses to calculate hip fracture incident rate ratios for gender, age, race/ethnicity, income, language (percent non-English speakers)—a proxy for acculturation—and living in rural areas.
During the 5-year period, 116,919 fractures occurred among 8,144,469 persons (2.87 fractures/1,000 persons per year). Higher income predicted lower hip fracture incidence. Persons in the highest decile of estimated income had an incident rate ratio (IRR) of 0.79 (95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 0.82) compared with those in the lowest decile. Greater IRR of hip fracture was predicted for persons living in areas with a greater percent of non-English speakers (IRR 1.004, 95% CI 1.003 to 1.005).
Low income and language fluency are predictors of greater hip fracture incidence. Although much attention is given to the aging of the “baby boomers”, low income and immigrant populations are at increased risk for hip fracture and require intervention.
KeywordsAging Hip fracture Income Osteoporosis Population studies
This study was supported through an unrestricted grant from the Merck Research Foundation. Dr. Zingmond is funded by a Mentored Clinical Scientist Award (NIA K08 AG023024-01A1).
- 15.US census (2004) Summary file 3-2000 census of population and housing—technical documentation. In: Commerce USDo (ed) US Department of Commerce Economics and Statistics AdministrationGoogle Scholar
- 16.US census (2004) ZIP code tabulation area (ZCTA): frequently asked questions. In: US censusGoogle Scholar
- 25.Chevalley T, Herrmann FR, Delmi M, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P, Rapin CH, Rizzoli R (2002) Evaluation of the age-adjusted incidence of hip fractures between urban and rural areas: the difference is not related to the prevalence of institutions for the elderly. Osteoporos Int 13:113–118PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 29.Schiller JS, Adams PF, Nelson ZC (2005) Summary health statistics for the US population: National Health Interview Survey, 2003. Vital Health Stat 10:1–104Google Scholar
- 31.Acheson SD (1998) Independent inquiry into inequalities in health. In: Stationary OfficeGoogle Scholar
- 32.US Department of Health and Human Services (2004) Bone health and osteoporosis: a report of the Surgeon General. US Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Office of the Surgeon General, Rockville, MDGoogle Scholar
- 33.US Department of Health and Human Services (2000) Objective 15–28. Reduce hip fractures among older adults. In: Healthy people 2010, 2nd edn. With understanding and improving health and objectives for improving health, 2 vols. US Government Printing Office, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar