Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 10, pp 1501–1505 | Cite as

Correlation of transmenopausal bone mass in healthy white women: a long-term longitudinal study

  • L.-J. Zhao
  • P.-Y. Liu
  • R. Recker
  • H.-W. Deng
Original Article



It is well established that menopause is associated with accelerated bone loss. However, no study has tested whether bone mass after the menopause transition is correlated with the premenopausal bone mass; that is, whether a high premenopausal bone mass will be predicatively high after menopause in an individual.

Materials and methods:

We examined the association of transmenopausal bone mass in 54 healthy premenopausal white women age 46 years or older at the initiation. These subjects experienced normal menopause and stayed in the study at least 1 year after their last menses without hormone replacement therapy. Bone mass of the lumbar spine (L2-L4) and total body were measured semiannually for 9.5 years.

Results and discussion:

In the 6-year period for which the data were analyzed, we found statistically significant correlations (p<0.05) over the 5.5-year and 5-year periods around menopause for pairwise transmenopausal lumbar spine Z-score and total body bone mineral content, respectively. The correlation declined with increase of the time interval across menopause. We conclude that for a limited time interval, bone mass after menopause is correlated with that before menopause.


Bone loss Bone mass Correlation Menopause Osteoporosis 



We thank Dr. Michael Davies for database management. The investigators were partially supported by grants from the National Institutes of Health and the State of Nebraska (LB595). The study also benefited from the Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China, Huo Ying Dong Education Foundation, Hunan Normal University, and 211 project funding through Xi’an Jiaotong University.


  1. 1.
    Recker R, Lappe J, Davies K, Heaney R (2000) Characterization of perimenopausal bone loss: a prospective study. J Bone Miner Res 15:1965–1973PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Shen H, Recker RR, Deng HW (2003) Molecular and genetic mechanisms of osteoporosis: implication for treatment. Curr Mol Med 3:737–757PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Riggs BL, Melton LJ III (1986) Involutional osteoporosis. N Engl J Med 314:1676–1686PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Truumees E (2001) Osteoporosis. Spine 26:930–932PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wark JD (1996) Osteoporotic fractures: background and prevention strategies. Maturitas 23:193–207PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gluer CC, Blake G, Lu Y, Blunt BA, Jergas M, Genant HK (1995) Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 5:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Abrahamsen B, Stilgren LS, Hermann AP, Tofteng CL, Barenholdt O, Vestergaard P, Brot C, Nielsen SP (2001) Discordance between changes in bone mineral density measured at different skeletal sites in perimenopausal women-implications for assessment of bone loss and response to therapy: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1212–1219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Young R, May H, Murphy S, Grey C, Compston JE (1996) Rates of bone loss in peri- and postmenopausal women: a 4 year, prospective, population-based study. Clin Sci (Lond) 91:307–312Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Hernandez CJ, Beaupre GS, Carter DR (2003) A theoretical analysis of the relative influences of peak BMD, age-related bone loss and menopause on the development of osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:843–847PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bainbridge KE, Sowers M, Lin X, Harlow SD (2004) Risk factors for low bone mineral density and the 6-year rate of bone loss among premenopausal and perimenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 15:439–446PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sowers M, Jannausch ML, Liang W, Willing M (2004) Estrogen receptor genotypes and their association with the 10-year changes in bone mineral density and osteocalcin concentrations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 89:733–739PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Davis JW, Grove JS, Ross PD, Vogel JM, Wasnich RD (1992) Relationship between bone mass and rates of bone change at appendicular measurement sites. J Bone Miner Res 7:719–725PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Bainbridge KE, Sowers MF, Crutchfield M, Lin X, Jannausch M, Harlow SD (2002) Natural history of bone loss over 6 years among premenopausal and early postmenopausal women. Am J Epidemiol 156:410–417PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Abrahamsen B, Nissen N, Hermann AP, Hansen B, Barenholdt O, Vestergaard P, Tofteng CL, Pors NS (2002) When should densitometry be repeated in healthy peri- and postmenopausal women: the Danish Osteoporosis Prevention Study. J Bone Miner Res 17:2061–2067PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • L.-J. Zhao
    • 1
  • P.-Y. Liu
    • 1
  • R. Recker
    • 1
  • H.-W. Deng
    • 2
    • 3
    • 4
  1. 1.Osteoporosis Research Center, Department of Biomedical SciencesCreighton University Medical CenterOmahaUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of Basic Medical Science, School of MedicineUniversity of Missouri-Kansas CityKansas CityUSA
  3. 3.Laboratory of Molecular and Statistical Genetics, College of Life SciencesHunan Normal UniversityChangshaPeople’s Republic of China
  4. 4.Key Laboratory of Biomedical Information Engineering, Ministry of Education and Institute of Molecular Genetics, School of Life Science and TechnologyXi’an Jiaotong UniversityXi’anPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations