Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 9, pp 1337–1345

Development of an integrated-care delivery model for post-fracture care in Ontario, Canada

  • S. B. Jaglal
  • C. Cameron
  • G. A. Hawker
  • J. Carroll
  • L. Jaakkimainen
  • S. M. Cadarette
  • E. R. Bogoch
  • H. Kreder
  • D. Davis
Original Article



The purpose of this study was to develop an integrated-care model for patients at highest risk for osteoporosis, those with a low-trauma fracture. Specific objectives were to describe the current processes and patterns of post-fracture care in hospitals in Ontario; to examine health-care professional and patient awareness of osteoporosis and the roles and responsibilities of various organizations and health care professionals; and to identify barriers and facilitators and obtain feedback on the model.


In 2002, questionnaires were completed for 178 eligible hospitals.


Only 65% of hospitals inform primary-care physicians of a fracture for all patients and only 4% indicated that they provide information about osteoporosis. The main themes that emerged from the four patient focus groups (n=21) were lack of continuity of care, the absence of a link between the fracture and osteoporosis by both patients and health care providers, and need for information. Most participants agreed that something was needed to prompt their primary-care physician to investigate for osteoporosis. The four physician focus groups (n=26) identified a role for orthopaedic surgeons to flag cases.


From 34 key informant interviews with community-based organizations, we found a lack of integration between health care professionals who provide fracture care and those who provide osteoporosis management and fall prevention. Based on these data, we developed an integrated local-resource-based post-fracture care model, which we obtained feedback on at a stakeholder consultation workshop. The model focuses on improving emergency department/fracture clinic communication, emphasizes the need for follow-up investigation by family physicians for osteoporosis, and incorporates other health care professionals and a telemedicine multidisciplinary osteoporosis clinic. We are currently evaluating whether this model leads to an increase in appropriate investigation of and treatment for osteoporosis in patients with low-trauma fractures.


Diagnosis Health services Low-trauma fracture Osteoporosis Treatment 


  1. 1.
    Elliot-Gibson V, Bogoch ER, Jamal SA, Beaton D (2004) Practice patterns in the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis after a fragility fracture: a systematic review. Osteoporos Int 15:767–778PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hajcsar EE, Hawker G, Bogoch ER (2000) Investigation and treatment of osteoporosis in patients with fragility fractures. CMAJ 163:819–822PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Khan SA, de Geus C, Holroyd B, Russell AS (2001) Osteoporosis follow-up after wrist fractures following minor trauma. Arch Intern Med 161:1309–1312PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Juby AG, De Geus-Wenceslau CM (2002) Evaluation of osteoporosis treatment in seniors after hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 13:205–210PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cadarette SM, Jaglal SB, Hawker GA (2005) Fracture prevalence and treatment with bone-sparing agents: are there urban-rural differences? A population based study in Ontario, Canada. J Rheumatol 32:550–558PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Solomon DH, Finkelstein J, Katz JN, Mogun H, Avorn J (2003) Underuse of osteoporosis medications in elderly patients with fractures. Am J Med 115:398–400PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Solomon DH, Brookhart M, Gandhi TK, Karson A, Gharib S, Orav E, Shaykevich S, Licari A, Cabral D, Bates D (2004) Adherence with osteoporosis practice guidelines: a multilevel analysis of patient, physician and practice characteristics. Am J Med 117:919–924PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jaglal SB, Weller I, Mamdani M, Hawker G, Kreder H, Jaakkimainen L, Adachi JD (2005) Population trends in bone density testing, treatment and hip and wrist fracture rates: are the hip fracture projections right? J Bone Miner Res 20:898–905PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Brown JP, Josse RG, Scientific Advisory Council of the Osteoporosis Society of Canada (2002) 2002 clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and management of osteoporosis in Canada. CMAJ 167:S1–S34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    National Osteoporosis Foundation (2003) Physician’s guide to prevention and treatment of osteoporosis. National Osteoporosis Foundation, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (2002) Screening for osteoporosis in postmenopausal women: recommendations and rationale (clinical guidelines). Ann Intern Med 137:526–528Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cheung AM, Feig DS, Kapral M, Diaz-Granados N, Dodin S (2004) Prevention of osteoporosis and osteoporotic fractures in postmenopausal women: recommendation statement from the canadian task force on preventive health care. CMAJ 170:1665–1667PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jaglal SB, Carroll J, Hawker GA, McIsaac WJ, Jaakkimainen L, Cadarette SM, Cameron C, Davis D (2003) How are family physicians managing osteoporosis? Qualitative study of their experiences and educational needs. Can Fam Physician 49:462–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Jaglal SB, McIsaac WJ, Hawker GA, Carroll J, Jaakkimainen L, Cadarette SM, Cameron C, Davis D (2003) Information needs in the management of osteoporosis in family practice: an illustration of the failure of the current guideline implementation process. Osteoporos Int 14:672–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Simonelli C, Killeen K, Mehle S, Swanson L (2002) Barriers to osteoporosis identification and treatment among primary care physicians and orthopedic surgeons. Mayo Clin Proc 77:334–338PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Taylor JC, Sterkel B, Utley M, Shipley M, Newman S, Horton M, Fitz-Clarence H (2001) Opinions and experiences in general practice on osteoporosis prevention, diagnosis and management. Osteoporos Int 12:844–848PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Werner P, Vered I (2002) Management of osteoporosis: a survey of Israeli physicians’ knowledge and attitudes. IMAJ 2:361–364Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ministry of Health, Long-Term Care (2002) List of areas designated as underserviced for general/family practitioners. Accessed at http://www.gov.on.ca/MON/english/program.uap/listof_areas/gp_ladau.pdf
  19. 19.
    Morgan DL (1998) Planning focus groups. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CAGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fall, fracture and osteoporosis risk control and evaluation (FORCE). Sault Ste. Marie, OntarioGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Majumdar SR, Rowe BH, Folk D, Johnson JA, Holroyd B, Morrish DW, Maksymowych WP, Steiner IP, Harley CH, Wirzba BJ, Hanley DA, Blitz S, Russell AS (2004) A controlled trial to increase detection and treatment of osteoporosis in older patients with a wrist fracture. Ann Intern Med 141:366–373PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hawker GA, Ridout R, Ricupero M, Jaglal SB, Bogoch ER (2003) The impact of a simple fracture clinic intervention in improving the diagnosis and treatment of osteoporosis in fragility fracture patients. Osteoporos Int 14:171–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bogoch ER, Elliot-Gibson V, Beaton DE, Jamal SA, Josse RG, Murray TM (2006) Effective initiation of osteoporosis diagnosis and treatment in fragility fracture patients in an orthopaedic enviroment. J Bone J Surg 88:25–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Bero LA, Grilli R, Grimshaw J, Harvey E, Oxman A, Thomson MA (1998) Closing the gap between research and practice: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions to promote the implementation of research findings. BMJ 317:465–468PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Grimshaw J, Shirran L, Thomas R, Mowatt G, Fraser C, Bero L, Grilli R, Harvey E, Oxman A, O’Brien MA (2001) Changing provider behavior: an overview of systematic reviews of interventions. Med Care 39:II-2–II-45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naunton M, Peterson GM, Jones G, Griffin GM, Bleasel M (2004) Multifaceted educational program increases prescribing of preventive medication for corticosteroid induced osteoporosis. J Rheumatol 31:413–415Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Thomson O’Brien MA, Oxman AD, Davis DA, Haynes RB (2003) Educational outreach visits: effects on professional practice and health care outcomes (Cochrane review). Cochrane Library, Issue 1Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • S. B. Jaglal
    • 1
  • C. Cameron
    • 2
  • G. A. Hawker
    • 2
  • J. Carroll
    • 3
  • L. Jaakkimainen
    • 4
  • S. M. Cadarette
    • 2
  • E. R. Bogoch
    • 5
  • H. Kreder
    • 4
  • D. Davis
    • 6
  1. 1.Department of Physical TherapyUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada
  2. 2.Osteoporosis Research ProgramSunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences CentreTorontoCanada
  3. 3.Ray D. Wolfe Department of Family MedicineMount Sinai HospitalTorontoCanada
  4. 4.Sunnybrook & Women’s College Health Sciences CentreTorontoCanada
  5. 5.St. Michael’s HospitalTorontoCanada
  6. 6.Continuing Medical EducationUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations