Osteoporosis International

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 1939–1947 | Cite as

Basic fibroblast growth factor improves trabecular bone connectivity and bone strength in the lumbar vertebral body of osteopenic rats

  • Wei Yao
  • Tamer Hadi
  • Yebin Jiang
  • Jeff Lotz
  • Thomas J. Wronski
  • Nancy E. Lane
Original Article

Abstract

Recently, basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF) has been found to increase trabecular bone mass and connectivity in the proximal tibial metaphyses (PTM) in osteopenic rats. The purpose of this study was to determine the bone anabolic effects of bFGF in the lumbar vertebral body (LVB), a less loaded skeletal site with a lower rate of bone turnover than the PTM. Six-month old female Sprague-Dawley rats were ovariectomized (OVX) or sham-operated and untreated for 8 weeks to induce osteopenia. Then group 1 (sham) and group 2 (OVX) were treated subcutaneously (SC) with vehicle, and OVXed groups 3 and 4 were treated SC with PTH [hPTH (1–34) at 40 μg/kg, 5×/week] and bFGF (1 mg/kg, 5×/week), respectively, for 8 weeks. At sacrifice, the fifth LVB was removed, subjected to micro-CT for determination of trabecular bone structure and then processed for histomorphometry to assess bone turnover. The sixth LVB was used for mechanical compression testing (MTS, Bionix 858). The data were analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by post-hoc testing as needed. After 16 weeks of estrogen deficiency, there were significant reductions in vertebral trabecular bone volume and trabecular thickness. Treatment with either bFGF or hPTH (1–34) increased BV/TV in OVX animals. Human PTH (1–34)-treated animals had significant increases in trabecular (48%) and cortical thickness (30%) and bone strength [maximum load (53%) and work to failure (175%)] compared to OVX + Vehicle animals. Treatment of osteopenic rats with bFGF increased bone volume (15%), trabecular thickness (13%), maximum load (45%) and work to failure (140%) compared to OVX + Vehicle animals (all P <0.05). Basic FGF increased trabecular bone volume in the lumbar vertebral body of osteopenic rats by restoring trabecular number, thickness and connectivity density. Also, bFGF improved bone mechanical properties (maximum force and work to failure) compared to the OVX + Vehicle group. Therefore, increasing the number, thickness and connections of the trabeculae contributes to increased bone strength in this small animal model of osteoporosis.

Keywords

Biomechanical properties Bone structure bFGF Lumber vertebrae Ovariectomy Rat 

References

  1. 1.
    Lane NE, Haupt D, Kinney JH (1997) Estrogen replacement therapy restores trabecular bone volume by altering microarchitecture in the ovariectomized rat. Transactions of the Orthopeadic Research Society, S211Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Heaney RP (2003) Remodeling and skeletal fragility. Osteoporos Int 14 [Suppl 5]:12–15Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chavassieux PM, Arlot ME, Reda C, Wei L, Yates J, Menuier PJ (1997) Histomorphometric assessment of the long-term effects of alendronate on bone quality and remodeling in patients with osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 100:1475–1480PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Borah B, Dufresne TE, Chmielewski PA, Gross GJ, Prenger MC, Phipps RJ (2002) Risedronate preserves trabecular architecture and increases bone strength in the vertebrae of ovariectomized minipigs measured by 3-dimensional microcomputered tomorgraph. J Bone Miner Res 17:1139–1147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Wronski TJ, Cintron M, Doherty AL, Dann LM (1988) Estrogen treatment prevents osteopenia and depresses bone turnover in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 123:681–686PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lane NE, Thompson JM, Strewler GJ, Kinney JH (1995) Intermittent treatment with human parathyroid hormone (hPTH[1–34]) increased trabecular bone volume but not connectivity in osteopenic rats. J Bone Miner Res 10:1470–1477PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Wronski TJ, Yen CF, Qi H, Dann LM (1993) Parathyroid hormone is more effective than estrogen for restoration of lost bone mass in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 132:823–831PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dempster DW, Cosman F, Kurland ES, Zhou H, Nieves J, Woelfert L, Shane E, Placetic K, Muller R, Bilizekian J, Lindsay R (2001) Effects of daily treatment with parathyroid hormone on bone microarchitecture and turnover in patients with osteoporosis. A paired biopsy study. J Bone Miner Res 16:1846–1853PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Paschalis EP, Burr DB, Mendelsohn R, Hock JM, Boskey AL (2003) Bone mineral and collagen quality in humeri of ovariectomized cynomolgus monkeys given rhPTH (1–34) for 18 months. J Bone Miner Res 18:769–775PubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lane NE, Sanchez S, Modin G, Genant HK, Pierini E, Arnaud CD (1998) Parathyroid hormone treatment can reverse steroid osteoporosis: results of a randomized clinical trial. J Clin Invest 102:1627–1633PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Liang H, Pun S, Wronski TJ (1999) Bone anabolic effects of basic fibroblast growth factor in ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 140:5780–5788PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pun S, Florio CL, Wronski TJ (2000) Anabolic effects of basic fibroblast growth factor in the tibial diaphysis of ovariectomized rats. Bone 27:197–202PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Pun S, Dearden RL, Ratkus AM, Liang H, Wronski TJ (2001) Decreased bone anabolic effects of basic fibroblast growth factor at fatty marrow sites in ovariectomized rats. Bone 28:220–226PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wronski TJ, Ratkus AM, Thomsen JS, Vulcan Q, Mosekilde L (2001) Sequential treatment with basic fibroblast growth factor and parathyroid hormone restores lost cancellous bone mass and strength in the proximal tibia of aged ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 16:1399–1407PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iwaniec UT, Mosekilde L, Mitova-Caneva NG, Thomsen JS, Wronski TJ (2002) Sequential treatment with basic fibroblast growth factor and PTH is more efficacious than treatment with PTH alone for increasing vertebral bone mass and strength in osteopenic ovariectomized rats. Endocrinology 143:2515–2526PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Lane, NE, Yao W, Kinney JH, Modin G, Balooch M, Wronski T (2003) Both hPTH (1–34) and bFGF increase trabecular bone mass in osteopenic rats, however they have different effects on trabecular bone architecture. J Bone Miner Res 18:2105–2115PubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jiang Y, Zhao J, Mitlak BH, Wang O, Genant HK, Eriksen EF (2003) Recombinant human parathyroid hormone (1–34) (teriparatide) improves both cortical and cancellous bone structure. J Bone Miner Res 18:1932–194PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Laib A, Kumer JL, Majumdar S, Lane N (2001) The temporal changes in trabecular architecture in ovariectomized rats assessed by microCT. Osteoporos Int 12:936–941PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lane NE, Kumer JL, Majumdar S, Khan M, Lotz J, Steven RE, Klein R, Phelps KV (2002) The effects of synthetic conjugated estrogens, A (Cenestin) on trabecular bone structure and strength in the ovariectomized rat model. Osteoporosis Int 13:816–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Hildebrand T, Rüegsegger P (1997) A new method for the model independent assessment of thickness in three-dimensional images. J Microsc 85:67–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maeda H, Kimmel DB, Raab D, Lane NE (1993) The musculoskeletal response to immobilization and recovery. Bone 14:153–159PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Parfitt AM, Drezner MK, Glorieux FH, Janis JA, Malluche H, Meunier PJ, Ott SM, Recker RR (1987) Bone histomorphometry: standardization of nomenclature, symbols and units. Report of the ASBMR Histomorphometry Committee. J Bone Miner Res 2:595–610PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Parfitt AM, Matthews CHE, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS (1983) Relationships between surface, area, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and in osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 72:1396–1409PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Linde F, Gothgen DB, Hvid I, Pongsoipetch B (1988) Mechanical properties of trabecular bone by nondestructive compression testing approach. Eng Med 17:23–29PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lotz JC, Kroeber MW, Heilmann K, Pericherla K, Kimmel D, Kinney JH, Lane NE (2000) Tibial plateau fracture as a measure of early estrogen-dependent bone fragility in rats. J Orthopaed Res 18:326–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lane NE, Yao W, Kumer J, Breuning T, Wronski T, Modin G, Kinney JH (2002) Basic fibroblast growth factor partially restores trabecular bone architecture in osteopenic ovariectomized rats. Osteoporosis Int 14:374–382Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Faulkner KG, McClung M, Cumming SR (1994) Automated evaluation of hip axis length for predicting hip fracture. J Bone Miner Res 9:1065–1070PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Duan Y, Parfitt M, Seeman E (1999) Vertebral bone mass, size and volumetric density in women with spinal fracture. J Bone Miner Res 14:1796–1802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ito M, Nishida A, Koga A, Ikeda S, Shiraishi A, Uetani M, Hayashi K, Nakamura T (2002) Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters. Bone 31:351–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Van der Meulen MCH, Jepsen KJ, Mikic B (2001) Understanding bone strength: size isn’t everything. Bone 29:101–104PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Bell GH, Dunbar O, Beck JR, Gibb A (1967) Variations in strength of vertebrae with age and their relation to osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 1:75–86Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Parfitt AM, Mathews CHE, Villanueva AR, Kleerekoper M, Frame B, Rao DS (1983) Relationship between surface, volume, and thickness of iliac trabecular bone in aging and osteoporosis. J Clin Invest 72:277–282Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lane NE, Haupt D, Modin G, Kinney JH (1998) The acute changes in trabecular bone connectivity and osteoclast activity in a rat model of estrogen deficiency. J Bone Miner Res 13:229–236PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Qi H, Li M, Wronski TJ (1995) A comparison of the anabolic effects of parathyroid hormone at skeletal sites with moderate and severe osteopenia in aged ovariectomized rats. J Bone Miner Res 10:948–952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Recker RR (1993) Architecture and vertebral fracture. Calcif Tissue Inc 53:s139–s142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Ito M, Nishida A, Koga A, Ikeda S, Shiraishi A, Uetani M, Hayashi K, Nakamura T (2002) Contribution of trabecular and cortical components to the mechanical properties of bone and their regulating parameters. Bone 31:351–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pothuaud L, Rietbergen BV, Mosekilde L, Beuf O, Levitz P, Benhamou CL, Majumdar S (2002) Combination of topological parameters and bone volume fraction better predicts the mechanical properties of trabecular bone. Bone 35:1091–1099Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Ulrich D, Rietbergen BV, Laib A, Rüegsegger P (1999) The ability of three-dimensional structure indices to reflect mechanical aspects of trabecular bone. Bone 25:55–60PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Wachter NJ, Augat P, Mentzel M, Sarkar MR, Krischak GD, Kinzi L, Claes LE (2001) Predictive value of bone mineral density and morphology determined by peripheral quantitative computed tomography for cancellous bone strength of the proximal femur. Bone 28:133–139PubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Thomsen JS, Ebbesen EN, Mosekilde L (2002) Predicting human veterbral bone strength by vertebral static histomorphometry. Bone 30:502–508PubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ikeda S, Tsurukami H, Ito M, Sakai A, Sakata T, Nishida S, Takeda S (2001) Effects of trabecular bone turnover contour on ultimate strength of lumbar vertebra after bilateral ovariectomy in rats. Bone 28:625–633PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wei Yao
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tamer Hadi
    • 1
    • 2
  • Yebin Jiang
    • 1
  • Jeff Lotz
    • 1
  • Thomas J. Wronski
    • 3
  • Nancy E. Lane
    • 1
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Medicine, Orthopedics and RadiologyUniversity of California at San FranciscoSan FranciscoUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineCenter for AgingSacramentoUSA
  3. 3.Department of Physiological SciencesUniversity of FloridaGainesvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations