Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 16, Issue 12, pp 1871–1874 | Cite as

Factors related to spinal mobility in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis

  • Naohisa Miyakoshi
  • Michio Hongo
  • Shigeto Maekawa
  • Yoshinori Ishikawa
  • Yoichi Shimada
  • Kyoji Okada
  • Eiji Itoi
Original Article

Abstract

Quality of life in patients with spinal osteoporosis is impaired by the decline of spinal mobility. However, the factors related to the spinal mobility in these patients are still unclear. We evaluated the possible factors affecting spinal mobility in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. A total of 128 postmenopausal women with osteoporosis aged over 50 years (mean, 70 years) were included in this study. The thoracic and lumbar kyphosis angles and range of motion (ROM) of the total spine were measured in the upright position and at maximum flexion/extension with a computer-assisted device. The paravertebral muscle thicknesses (PVMT) of thoracic and lumbar spine in the upright position were measured using an ultrasound unit. The number of vertebral fractures was evaluated with radiographs of the spine. Isometric back extensor strength (BES) was evaluated with a strain-gauge dynamometer. Correlations between these variables were then analyzed. Age ( r =−0.412), lumbar kyphosis angle ( r =−0.284), BES ( r =0.369), PVMT at the lumbar spine ( r =0.227) and the number of vertebral fractures ( r =−0.260) showed significant correlations with total spinal ROM ( P <0.05). However, no significant correlations were observed between the total spinal ROM and PVMT at the thoracic spine ( r =−0.069) or thoracic kyphosis angle ( r =−0.138). Multiple regression analysis revealed that the BES was the most significant contributor to the total spinal ROM. The present study suggests a possible association between BES and spinal mobility in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis.

Keywords

Back extensor strength Osteoporosis Quality of life Spinal mobility 

References

  1. 1.
    Nicholas J, Wilson P (1963) Osteoporosis of the aged spine. Clin Orthop 26:19–33PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ryan S, Fried L (1997) The impact of kyphosis on daily functioning. J Am Gerontol Soc 45:1479–1486Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Nevitt MC, Ettinger B, Black DM, et al (1998) The association of radiographically detected vertebral fractures with back pain and function: a prospective study. Ann Intern Med 128:793–800Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Martin AR, Sornay-Rendu E, Chandler JM, et al (2002) The impact of osteoporosis on quality-of-life: the OFELY cohort. Bone 31:32–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Miyakoshi N, Itoi E, Kobayashi M, et al (2003) Impact of postural deformities and spinal mobility on quality of life in postmenopausal osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 14:1007–1012CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al (1997) Quality of life as outcome in the treatment of osteoporosis: the development of a questionnaire for quality of life by the European Foundation for Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int 7:36–38CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Lips P, Cooper C, Agnusdei D, et al (1999) Quality of life in patients with vertebral fractures: validation of the quality of life questionnaire of the European Foundation for Osteoporosis (QUALEFFO). Osteoporos Int 10:150–160CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Oleksik A, Lips P, Dawson A, et al (2000) Health-related quality of life in postmenopausal women with low BMD with or without prevalent vertebral fractures. J Bone Miner Res 15:1384–1392PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Silverman SL, Minshall ME, Shen W, et al (2001) The relationship of health-related quality of life to prevalent and incident vertebral fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis: results from the Multiple Outcomes of Raloxifene Evaluation Study. Arthritis Rheum 44:2611–2619CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Berger C, et al (2001) The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada. Osteoporos Int 12:903–908PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Adachi JD, Ioannidis G, Olszynski WP, et al (2002) The impact of incident vertebral and non-vertebral fractures on health related quality of life in postmenopausal women. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 3:11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, et al (2001) Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Mineral Metab 19:331–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Shimada T (1996) Factors affecting appearance patterns of hip-flexion contractures and their effects on postural and gait abnormalities. Kobe J Med Sci 42:271–290PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Miyakoshi N, Itoi E, Murai H, et al (2003) Inverse relation between osteoporosis and spondylosis in postmenopausal women as evaluated by bone mineral density and semiquantitative scoring of spinal degeneration. Spine 28:492–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Orimo H, Shiraki M, Hayashi Y, et al (1994) Effects of 1α-hydroxyvitamin D3 on lumbar bone mineral density and vertebral fractures in patients with postmenopausal osteoporosis. Calcif Tissue Int 54:370–376CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Post RB, Leferink VJ (2004) Spinal mobility: sagittal range of motion measured with the SpinalMouse, a new non-invasive device. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 124:187–192CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Watanabe K, Miyamoto K, Masuda T, et al (2004) Use of ultrasonography to evaluate thickness of the erector spinae muscle in maximum flexion and extension of the lumbar spine. Spine 29:1472–1477CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Limburg PJ, Sinaki M, Rogers JW, et al (1991) A useful technique for measurement of back strength in osteoporotic and elderly patients. Mayo Clin Proc 66:39–44PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lyles KW, Gold DT, Shipp KM, et al (1993) Association of osteoporosis vertebral compression fractures with impaired functional status. Am J Med 94:595–601CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Huang C, Ross PD, Wasnich RD (1996) Vertebral fracture and other predictors of physical impairment and health care utilization. Arch Intern Med 15:2469–2475CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Burger H, VanDaele PLA, Grashuis K, et al (1997) Vertebral deformities and functional impairment in men and women. J Bone Miner Res 12:152–157PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Sinaki M, Itoi E, Rogers JW, et al (1996) Correlation of back extensor strength with thoracic kyphosis and lumbar lordosis in estrogen-deficient women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 75:370–374CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Itoi E, Yamada Y, Sakurai M, et al (1990) Bone mineral density and back muscle strength in spinal osteoporosis. J Bone Miner Metab 8:77–80Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Cutler WB, Friedmann E, Genovese-stone E (1993) Prevalence of kyphosis in a healthy sample of pre and postmenopausal women. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 72:219–225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Petrie RS, Sinaki M, Squires RW, et al (1993) Physical activity, but not aerobic capacity correlates with back strength in healthy premenopausal women from 29 to 40 years of age. Mayo Clin Proc 68:738–742PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Sinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, et al (2002) Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of postmenopausal women. Bone 30:836–841CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    World Health Organization (1994) Assessment of fracture risk and its application to screening for postmenopausal osteoporosis. WHO technical report series 843. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  • Naohisa Miyakoshi
    • 1
  • Michio Hongo
    • 1
  • Shigeto Maekawa
    • 1
  • Yoshinori Ishikawa
    • 1
  • Yoichi Shimada
    • 1
  • Kyoji Okada
    • 1
  • Eiji Itoi
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryAkita University School of MedicineAkitaJapan

Personalised recommendations