Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 91–98 | Cite as

Socioeconomic influences on bone health in postmenopausal women: findings from NHANES III, 1988–1994

Original Article

Abstract

Our objectives were (1) to examine the associations of education and income with bone health in non-Hispanic White, non-Hispanic Black and Mexican-American postmenopausal women, (2) to determine if any observed associations can be explained by behavioral factors such as calcium intake and physical activity and (3) to determine if government food assistance and education are associated with increased calcium intake among low-income women. Cross-sectional data were gathered by the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994 (NHANES III) using a stratified multistage probability design. Bone health was indicated by total hip bone mineral density (BMD, g/cm2). Multiple linear regression was used to evaluate the associations of education, income and behavioral factors with BMD. There were 2,905 postmenopausal women with acceptable DXA scans and complete relevant data selected from a nationally representative sample of the civilian non-institutionalized population aged 2 months and older. Education and income were positively associated with BMD in Black and White women, respectively, but not in Mexican-American women. When behavioral factors were included in the analyses, associations with education and income were eliminated. Instead, positive associations with estrogen use, calcium intake and physical activity, and a negative association with smoking, were noted in White women. Among low-income women, education was associated with increased calcium intake, while participation in the Food Stamp Program was associated with increased calcium intake in Black women. We conclude that education and/or income are positively associated with BMD among Black and White postmenopausal women, and that efforts to promote bone health among low-income women are warranted.

Keywords

Bone density Food assistance Postmenopausal women Socioeconomic position White, Black and Mexican-American 

References

  1. 1.
    World Health Organization (2003) The burden of musculoskeletal conditions at the start of the new millennium. WHO Technical Report Series No. 919Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Consensus Development Conference (1993) Diagnosis, prophylaxis, and treatment of osteoporosis. Am J Med 94:646–649CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ray NF, Chan JK, Thamer M, Melton LJ III (1997) Medical expenditures for the treatment of osteoporotic fractures in the United States in 1995: Report from the National Osteoporosis Foundation. J Bone Miner Res 12:24–35PubMedCrossRefADSMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Melton LJ III (2003) Adverse outcomes of osteoporotic fractures in the general population. J Bone Miner Res 18:1139–1141PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nelson DA, Megyesi MS (2004) Sex and ethnic differences in bone architecture. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2:65–69PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wilkinson RG, Marmot MG (eds) (1998) Social determinants of health: the solid facts. WHO European Region, CopenhagenGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Winkleby MA, Kraemer HC, Ahn DK, Varady AN (1998) Ethnic and socioeconomic differences in cardiovascular disease risk factors: findings for women from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. JAMA 280:356–362CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Sobal J, Stunkard AJ (1989) Socioeconomic status and obesity: a review of the literature. Psychol Bull 105:260–275CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Farahmand BY, Persson PG, Michaelsson K et al (2000) Socioeconomic status, marital status and hip fracture risk: a population-based case-control study. Osteoporosis Int 11:803–808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    del Rio Barquero, L, Baures, MR, Segura, JP, Quinquer, JS, Majem, LS, Ruiz, PG, Navarro, CL, Torne, FMD (1992) Bone mineral density in two different socioeconomic population groups. Bone Miner 18:159–168CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Elliot JR, Gilchrist NL, Wells JE (1996) The effect of socioeconomic status on bone density in a male Caucasian population. Bone 18:371–373CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pearson D, Taylor R, Masud T (2004) The relationship between social deprivation, osteoporosis, and falls. Osteoporos Int 15:132–138CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Inanici-Ersoz F, Gokce-Kutsal Y, Oncel S, Eryavuz M, Peker O, Ok S (2002) A multicenter, case control study of risk factors for low tibial speed of sound among residents of urban areas in Turkey. Rheumatol Int 22:20–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Gilsanz V, Gibbens DT, Roe TF, Carlson M, Senac MO, Boechat MI, Huang HK, Schulz EE, Libanatai CR, Cann CC (1988) Vertebral BMD in children: effect of puberty. Radiology 166:847–850PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Pollitzer WS, Anderson JJB (1989) Ethnic and genetic differences in bone mass: a review with a hereditary vs. environmental perspective. Am J Clin Nutr 50:1244–1259PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Khosla S, Atkinson E, Riggs BL (1996) Relationships between body composition and bone mass in women. J Bone Min Res 11:857–863Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Heaney RP (1996) Nutrition and risk for osteoporosis. In: Marcus R, Feldman D, Kelsey JL (eds) Osteoporosis. Academic Press, New York, pp 483–510Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mazess RB, Barden HS (1991) BMD in pre-menopausal women: effects of age, dietary intake, physical activity, smoking and birth-control pills. Am J Clin Nutr 53:132–142PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Subar AF, Heimendinger J, Patterson BH, Krebs-Smith SM, Pivonka E, Kessler R (1995) Fruit and vegetable intake in the United States: the baseline survey of the Five A Day for Better Health Program. Am J Health Promot 9:352–360PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thompson B, Demark-Wahnefried W, Taylor G, McClelland JW, Stables G, Havas S, Feng Z, Topor M, Heimendinger J, Reynolds KD, Cohen N (1999) Baseline fruit and vegetable intake among adults in seven 5 a day study centers located in diverse geographic areas. J Am Diet Assoc 99:1241–1248CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leino M, Raitakari OT, Porkka KV, Taimela S, Viikari JS (1999) Associations of education with cardiovascular risk factors in young adults: the Cardiovascular Risk in Young Finns Study. Int J Epidemiol 28:667–675CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wadsworth ME (1997) Health inequalities in the life course perspective. Soc Sci Med 44:859–869CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang MC, Crawford PB, Hudes M, Van Loan M, Siemering K, Bachrach LK (2003) Diet in midpuberty and sedentary activity in prepuberty predict peak bone mass. Am J Clin Nutr 77:495–503PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Looker AC, Johnston CC Jr, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP, Lindsay R (1995) Prevalence of low femoral BMD in older U.S. women from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 10:796–802PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Looker AC, Orwoll ES, Johnston CC Jr, Lindsay RL, Wahner HW, Dunn WL, Calvo MS, Harris TB, Heyse SP (1997) Prevalence of low femoral BMD in older U.S. adults from NHANES III. J Bone Miner Res 12:1761–1768PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    U.S. Department of Agriculture (2004) The Food Stamp program. http://www.fns.usda.gov/fsp/ (accessed 10 December 2004)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Administration on Aging (2004) The Elderly Nutrition Program. http://www.aoa.gov/press/fact/alpha/fact_elderly_nutrition.asp (accessed 10 December 2004)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (1994) Plan and operation of the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Vital Health Statistics. DHHS publication PHS 94–1308, no. 32Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wahner HW, Looker AC, Dunn WL, Hauser MF, Walters WC, Novak C (1994) Quality control of bone densitometry in a national health survey (NHANES III) using three mobile examination centers. J Bone Miner Res 9:951–960PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    United States Department of Health and Human Services (1996) NHANES III Manual and Reports. CD-ROMGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Lynch JW, Kaplan, GA, Shema, SJ (1997) Cumulative impact of sustained economic hardship on physical, cognitive, psychological, and social functioning. NEJM 337:1889–1895CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wilde P, Dagata E (2002) Food stamp participation by eligible older Americans remains low. Food Rev 25:25–29Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Dixon LB, Sundquist J, Winkleby M (2000) Differences in energy, nutrient, and food intakes in a US sample of Mexican-American women and men: Findings from the Third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 1988–1994. Am J Epidemiol 152:548–557CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Shah BV, Barnewell BG, Bieler GS (1997) SUDAAN User’s Manual, Release 7.5. Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, NCGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Goldman N (2001) Social inequalities in health disentangling the underlying mechanisms. Ann N Y Acad Sci 954:118–139PubMedCrossRefADSGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Berkman LF (1984) Assessing the physical health effects of social networks and social support. Ann Rev Public Health 413–432Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    James WP, Nelson M, Ralph A, Leather S (1997) Socioeconomic determinants of health. The contribution of nutrition to inequalities in health. BMJ 314:1545–1549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Marmot M, Wilkinson RG (2001) Psychosocial and material pathways in the relation between income and health: a response to Lynch et al. BMJ 322:1233–1236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Lauderdale DA, Salant T, Han KL, Tran PL (2001) Life course predictors of ultrasonic heel measurement in a cross-sectional study of immigrant women from Southeast Asia. Am J Epidemiology 153:581–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Opotowsky AR, Bilezikian JP (2003) Racial differences in the effect of early milk consumption on peak and postmenopausal bone mineral density. J Bone Miner Res 18:1978–1988PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Lantz PM, Lynch JW, House JS, Lepkowski JM, Mero RP, Musick MA, Williams DR (2001) Socioeconomic disparities in health change in a longitudinal study of US adults: the role of health-risk behaviors. Soc Sci Med 53:29–40CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Levedahl JW, Oliveira V (1999) Dietary impacts of food assistance programs. In: Frazao E (ed) America’s eating habits. US Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Gleason P, Rangarajan A, Olson C (2000) Dietary intake and dietary attitudes among food stamp participants and other low-income individuals. Mathematica Policy Research Inc, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Arnold CG, Ladipo P, Nguyen CH, Nkinda-Chaiban P, Olson CM (2001) New concepts for nutrition education in an era of welfare reform. J Nutr Educ 33:341–346PubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Laraia BA, Siega-Riz AM, Kaufman JS, Jones SJ (2004) Proximity of supermarkets is positively associated with diet quality index for pregnancy. Prev Med 39:869–875CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Horowitz CR, Colson KA, Hebert PL, Lancaster K (2004) Barriers to buying healthy foods for people with diabetes: evidence of environmental disparities. Am J Public Health 94:1549–1554PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Boslaugh SE, Luke DA, Brownson RC, Naleid KS, Kreuter MW (2004) Perceptions of neighborhood environment for physical activity: is it “who you are” or “Where you live”? J Urban Health 81:671–681PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2005

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Public HealthUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  2. 2.Center for Weight and HealthUniversity of California at BerkeleyBerkeleyUSA
  3. 3.Department of Nutrition, Food Studies and Public HealthNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations