Advertisement

Osteoporosis International

, Volume 17, Issue 5, pp 753–759 | Cite as

Computer-aided system for measuring the mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs in identifying postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density

  • A. Z. Arifin
  • A. Asano
  • A. Taguchi
  • T. Nakamoto
  • M. Ohtsuka
  • M. Tsuda
  • Y. Kudo
  • K. Tanimoto
Original Article

Abstract

Introduction

Mandibular inferior cortical width manually measured on dental panoramic radiographs may be useful for identifying postmenopausal women with low skeletal bone mineral density (BMD). Automatic measurement of cortical width may enable us to identify a large number of postmenopausal women with suspected low skeletal BMD. The purposes of this study were to develop a computer-aided system for measuring mandibular cortical width on dental panoramic radiographs and clarify the diagnostic efficacy of this system.

Methods

Panoramic radiographs of 100 postmenopausal women who had had BMD assessments of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck were used in this study. Experienced oral radiologist determined the position of the mental foramen on 100 digitized dental panoramic radiographs. After determination of the mental foramen, mandibular cortical width below the mental foramen was measured automatically with a computer-aided system by identifying the area of interest, enhancing the original image, determining inner and outer margins of the cortex, and selecting an appropriate point. Cortical width measured by this system was compared with BMD of the lumbar spine and the femoral neck.

Results

There were statistically significant correlation between cortical width measured by the computer-aided system and spinal BMD (r=0.50) and femoral neck BMD (r=0.54). These correlations were similar with those between cortical width by manual measurement and skeletal BMD. Sensitivity and specificity for identifying postmenopausal women with low spinal BMD by the computer-aided system were about 88.0% and about 58.7%, respectively. Those for identifying postmenopausal women with low femoral neck BMD by this system were about 87.5% and about 56.3%, respectively.

Conclusion

Our results suggest that our computer-aided system may be useful for identifying postmenopausal women with low skeletal BMD.

Keywords

Computer-aided Mandible Menopause Osteoporosis Panoramic radiograph 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research from the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (14571786, 16390616) and the 2004 Hiroshima University Research Supporting Budget.

References

  1. 1.
    Gullberg B, Johnell O, Kanis JA (1997) World-wide projections for hip fracture. Osteoporos Int 7:407–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (2004) The 2004 surgeon general’s report on bone health and osteoporosis: what it means to you: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Surgeon GeneralGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Kanis JA, Johnell O (2005) Requirements for DXA for the management of osteoporosis in Europe. Osteoporos Int 16:229–238PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Klemetti E, Kolmakov S, Kröger H (1994) Pantomography in assessment of the osteoporosis risk group. Scand J Dent Res 102:68–72PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Taguchi A, Suei Y, Ohtsuka M, Otani K, Tanimoto K, Ohtaki M (1996) Usefulness of panoramic radiography in the diagnosis of postmenopausal osteoporosis in women. Width and morphology of inferior cortex of the mandible. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 25:263–267PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bollen AM, Taguchi A, Hujoel PP, Hollender LG (2000) Case-control study on self-reported osteoporotic fractures and mandibular cortical bone. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod 90:518–524PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M, Tanimoto K, Tsuda M, Sanada M, Ohama K, Takahashi J, Rohlin M (2003) Dental panoramic radiograph as a tool to detect postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density: untrained general dental practitioners’ diagnostic performance. Osteoporos Int 14:659–664PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Taguchi A, Sanada M, Krall E, Nakamoto T, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Tanimoto K, Kodama I, Tsuda M, Ohama K (2003) Relationship between dental panoramic radiographic findings and biochemical markers of bone turnover. J Bone Miner Res 18:1689–1694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Devlin H, Horner K (2002) Mandibular radiomorphometric indices in the diagnosis of reduced skeletal bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 13:373–378CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Taguchi A, Suei Y, Sanada M, Ohtsuka M, Nakamoto T, Sumida H, Ohama K, Tanimoto K (2004) Validation of dental panoramic radiography measures for identifying postmenopausal women with spinal osteoporosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 183:1755–1760PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    White SC, Taguchi A, Kao D, Wu S, Service SK, Yoon D, Suei Y, Nakamoto T, Tanimoto K (2005) Clinical and panoramic predictors of femur bone mineral density. Osteoporos Int 16:339–346PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Molander B, Grondahl HG, Ekestubbe A (2004) Quality of film-based and digital panoramic radiography. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 33:32–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Orimo H, Hayashi Y, Fukunaga M, Sone T, Fujiwara S, Shiraki M, Kushida K, Miyamoto S, Soen S, Nishimura J, Oh-Hashi Y, Hosoi T, Gorai I, Tanaka H, Igai T, and Kishimoto H (2001) Osteoporosis Diagnostic Criteria Review Committee: Japanese Society for Bone and Mineral Research. Diagnostic criteria for primary osteoporosis: year 2000 revision. J Bone Miner Metab 19(6):331–337CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fujiwara S, Masunari N, Suzuki G, Ross PD (2001) Performance of osteoporosis risk indices in a Japanese population. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 62:586–593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Arifin AZ, Asano A, Taguchi A, Nakamoto T, Ohtsuka M, Tanimoto K (2005) Computer-aided system for measuring the mandibular cortical width on panoramic radiographs in osteoporosis diagnosis. Proceedings of the SPIE Medical Imaging 5747:813–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Arifin AZ and Asano A (2004) Image thresholding by histogram segmentation using cluster organization avoiding local minima. IEICE Technical Report 104:1–7Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Dey A, McCloskey EV, Taube T, Cox R, Pande KC, Ashford RU, Forster M, de Takats D, Kanis JA (2000) Metacarpal morphometry using a semi-automated technique in the assessment of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture risk. Osteoporos Int 11:953–958CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Richy F, Gourlay M, Ross PD, Sen SS, Radican L, De Ceulaer F, Ben Sedrine W, Ethgen O, Bruyere O, Reginster JY (2004) Validation and comparative evaluation of the osteoporosis self-assessment tool (OST) in a Caucasian population from Belgium. QJM 97:39–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cadarette SM, McIsaac WJ, Hawker GA, Jaakkimainen L, Culbert A, Zarifa G, Ola E, Jaglal SB (2004) The validity of decision rules for selecting women with primary osteoporosis for bone mineral density testing. Osteoporos Int 15:361–366CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cook RB, Collins D, Tucker J, Zioupos P (2005) Comparison of questionnaire and quantitative ultrasound techniques as screening tools for DXA. Osteoporos Int DOI "10.1007/s00198-005-1864-x"Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Nakamoto T, Taguchi A, Asano A, Ohtsuka M, Suei Y, Fujita M, Sanada M, Ohama K, Tanimoto K (2004) Computer-aided diagnosis of low skeletal bone mass on panoramic radiographs. J Dent Res 83, Special issue A, 1953Google Scholar

Copyright information

© International Osteoporosis Foundation and National Osteoporosis Foundation 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Z. Arifin
    • 1
  • A. Asano
    • 2
  • A. Taguchi
    • 3
  • T. Nakamoto
    • 4
  • M. Ohtsuka
    • 4
  • M. Tsuda
    • 5
  • Y. Kudo
    • 5
  • K. Tanimoto
    • 4
  1. 1.Department of Information Engineering, Graduate School of EngineeringHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  2. 2.Division of Mathematical and Information Sciences, Faculty of Integrated Arts and SciencesHiroshima UniversityHigashi-HiroshimaJapan
  3. 3.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial RadiologyHiroshima University HospitalHiroshimaJapan
  4. 4.Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology, Division of Medical Intelligence and Informatics, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan
  5. 5.Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Clinical Medical Science, Graduate School of Biomedical SciencesHiroshima UniversityHiroshimaJapan

Personalised recommendations