The effect of age and bone mineral density on the absolute, excess, and relative risk of fracture in postmenopausal women aged 50–99: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA)
- 836 Downloads
This study evaluates the effect of age and bone mineral density (BMD) on the absolute, excess, and relative risk for osteoporotic fractures at the hip, wrist, forearm, spine, and rib within 3 years of peripheral BMD testing in postmenopausal women over a wide range of postmenopausal ages.
Data were obtained from 170,083 women, aged 50–99 years, enrolled in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) following recruitment from their primary care physicians’ offices across the United States. Risk factors for fracture and peripheral BMD T-scores at the heel, forearm, or finger were obtained at baseline. Self-reported new fractures at the hip, spine, rib, wrist, and forearm were obtained from questionnaires at 1- and 3-year follow-ups. Absolute, excess (attributable to low BMD), and unadjusted and adjusted relative risks of fracture were calculated.
At follow-up, 5312 women reported 5676 fractures (868 hip, 2420 wrist/forearm, 1531 rib, and 857 spine). Absolute risk of fracture increased with age for all fracture sites. This age-effect was most evident for hip fracture – both the incidence and the excess risk of hip fracture for women with low BMD increased at least twofold for each decade increase in age. The relative risk for any fracture per 1 SD decrease in BMD was similar across age groups (p>0.07). Women with low BMD (T-score <−1.0) had a similar relative risk for fracture regardless of age.
At any given BMD, not only the absolute fracture risk but also the excess fracture risk increased with advancing age. Relative risk of fracture for low bone mass was consistent across all age groups from 50 to 99 years.
KeywordsBMD NORA Postmenopausal Risk of fracture
National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA) was funded and managed by Merck & Co Inc., in collaboration with the International Society for Clinical Densitometry.
- 3.National Osteoporosis Foundation (1998) Osteoporosis: review of the evidence for prevention, diagnosis and treatment and cost–effectiveness analysis. Osteoporos Int 8[Suppl 4]:7–80Google Scholar
- 14.Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Abbott TA, Sherwood LM, Berger ML (1998) Design of NORA, the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment Program: a longitudinal US registry of postmenopausal women. Osteoporos Int 8[Suppl 1]:62–69Google Scholar
- 15.Siris ES, Miller PD, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2001) Identification and fracture outcomes of undiagnosed low bone mineral density in postmenopausal women: results from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. JAMA 286:2815–2822CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 16.Fasano G, Gaither K, Siris E, Miller P, Barrett-Connor E, Berger M, Sherwood L, Santora A, Faulkner K (1998) The impact of quality assurance on bone densitometry in the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment. Bone 23:S590Google Scholar
- 17.Miller PD, Siris ES, Barrett-Connor E, Faulkner KG, Wehren LE, Abbott TA, Chen Y-T, Berger ML, Santora AC, Sherwood LM (2002) Prediction of fracture risk in postmenopausal Caucasian women with peripheral bone densitometry: evidence from the National Osteoporosis Risk Assessment (NORA). J Bone Miner Res 17:2222–2230PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 23.US Census Bureau National Estimates. http://www.census.gov/popest/national/asrh/NC-EST2003-as.html. 2003. 10–5–2004
- 34.Grundy SM, Paternak R, Greenland P, Smith S, Fuster V (1999) Assessment of cardiovascular risk by use of multiple-risk-factor assessment equations: A statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association and the American College of Cardiology. J Am Coll Cardiol 34:1348–1359CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 38.Ismail AA, O’Neill TW, Cockerill W, Finn JD, Cannata JB, Hoszowski K, Johnell O, Matthis C, Raspe H, Raspe A, Reeve J, Silman AJ (2000) Validity of self-report of fractures: results from a prospective study in men and women across Europe. EPOS Study Group. European Prospective Osteoporosis Study Group. Osteoporos Int 11:248–254CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- 50.Clowes JA, Peel NFA, Eastell R (2002) Fractures of the distal forearm, humerus, hip and vertebrae: Association with peripheral and axial densitometry measurements. J Bone Miner Res 17:S186Google Scholar
- 52.Rothman KJ, Greenland S (1998) Modern epidemiology. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins, PhiladelphiaGoogle Scholar